A static analysis of three-dimensional sandwich beam structures using one-dimensional modelling approach is presented within this paper. A family of several one-dimensional beam elements is obtained by hierarchically expanding the displacements over the cross-section and letting the expansion order a free parameter. The finite element approximation order over the beam axis is also a formulation free parameter (linear, quadratic and cubic elements are considered). The principle of virtual displacements is used to obtain the problem weak form and derive the beam stiffness matrix and equivalent load vectors in a nuclear, generic form. Displacements and stresses are presented for different load and constraint configurations. Results are validated towards three-dimensional finite element solutions and experimental results. Sandwich beams present a three-dimensional stress state and higher-order models are necessary for an accurate description. Numerical investigations show that fairly good results with reduced computational costs can be obtained by the proposed finite element formulation.
BanerjeeJRSobeyAJ. Dynamic stiffness formulation and free vibration analysis of a three-layered sandwich beam. Int J Solids Struct2005; 42: 2181–2197.
7.
DamanpackARKhaliliSMR. High-order free vibration analysis of sandwich beams with a flexible core using dynamic stiffness method. Compos Struct2012; 94: 1503–1514.
8.
LéotoingLDrapierSVautrinA. Nonlinear interaction of geometrical and material properties in sandwich beam instabilities. Int J Solids Struct2002; 39: 3717–3739.
9.
FrostigYBaruchMVilnayO, et al.High-order theory for sandwich-beam behavior with transversely flexible core. J Eng Mech1992; 118: 1026–1043.
10.
FrostigYShenharY. High-order bending of sandwich beams with a transversely flexible core and unsymmetrical laminated composite skins. Compos Eng1995; 5: 405–414.
11.
ChoYBAverillR. An improved theory and finite-element model for laminated composite and sandwich beams using first-order zig-zag sublaminate approximations. Compos Struct1997; 37: 281–298.
12.
KapuriaSDumirPCJainNK. Assessment of zigzag theory for static loading, buckling, free and forced response of composite and sandwich beams. Compos Struct2004; 64: 317–327.
13.
DaiGMZhangWH. Size effects of basic cell in static analysis of sandwich beams. Int J Solids Struct2008; 45: 2512–2533.
14.
VidalPPolitO. Vibration of multilayered beams using sinus finite elements with transverse normal stress. Compos Struct2010; 92: 1524–1534.
15.
HuHBelouettarSPotier-FerryM, et al.Assessment of various kinematic models for instability analysis of sandwich beams. Eng Struct2011; 33: 572–579.
16.
HuHBelouettarSPotier-FerryM, et al.A novel finite element for global and local buckling analysis of sandwich beams. Compos Struct2009; 90: 270–278.
17.
PhanCNFrostigYKardomateasGA. Analysis of sandwich beams with a compliant core and with in-plane rigidity-extended high-order sandwich panel theory versus elasticity. J Appl Mech2012; 79: 041001–041001.
18.
WangYWangX. Static analysis of higher order sandwich beams by weak form quadrature element method. Compos Struct2014; 116: 841–848.
19.
PourvaisYAsgariPMoradiAR, et al.Experimental and finite element analysis of higher order behaviour of sandwich beams using digital projection moiré. Polym Test2014; 38: 7–17.
20.
BardellaLMatteiO. On explicit analytic solutions for the accurate evaluation of the shear stress in sandwich beams with a clamped end. Compos Struct2014; 112: 157–168.
21.
Salami JedariSDariushiSSadighiM, et al.An advanced high-order theory for bending analysis of moderately thick faced sandwich beams. Eur J Mech-A/Solids2016; 56: 1–11.
22.
CarreraE. Theories and finite elements for multilayered plates and shells: a unified compact formulation with numerical assessment and benchmarking. Archiv Comput Methods Eng2003; 10: 216–296.
23.
CarreraEGiuntaG. Hierarchical models for failure analysis of plates bent by distributed and localized transverse loadings. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A2008; 9: 600–613.
24.
CarreraEGiuntaG. Exact, hierarchical solutions for localised loadings in isotropic, laminated and sandwich shells. J Pressure Vessel Technol2009; 131: 0412021–04120214.
25.
GiuntaGBiscaniFBelouettarS, et al.Hierarchical modelling of doubly curved laminated composite shells under distributed and localised loadings. Compos Part B2011; 42: 682–691.
26.
GiuntaGCatapanoABelouettarS. Failure indentation analysis of composite sandwich plates via hierarchical models. J Sandw Struct Mater2013; 15: 45–70.
27.
CarreraEGiuntaGPetroloM. Beam structures: Classical and advanced theories, Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons, 2011.
28.
GiuntaGMetlaNKoutsawaY, et al.Free vibration and stability analysis of three-dimensional sandwich beams via hierarchical models. Compos Part B: Eng2013; 47: 326–338.
29.
CatapanoAGiuntaGBelouettarS, et al.Static analysis of laminated beams via a unified formulation. Compos Struct2011; 94: 75–83.
30.
HeQZHuHBelouettarS, et al.Multi-scale modelling of sandwich structures using hierarchical kinematics. Compos Struct2011; 93: 2375–2383.
31.
GiuntaGBelouettarSNasserH, et al.Hierarchical models for the static analysis of three-dimensional sandwich beam structures. Compos Struct2015; 133: 1284–1301.
32.
BatheKJ. Finite element procedures, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1996.
33.
ReddyJN. Mechanics of laminated composite plates and shells: Theory and analysis, 2nd ed. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 2004.
34.
CowperGR. The shear co-efficient in Timoshenko beam theory. J Appl Mech1966; 33: 335–340.
35.
MurtyAVK. Analysis of short beams. AIAA J1970; 8: 2098–2100.
36.
GibsonLJAshbyMF. Cellular solids: structure and properties, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
37.
GrediacM. A finite element study of the transverse shear in honeycomb cores. Int J Solids Struct1993; 30: 1777–1788.
38.
CarreraEGiuntaG. Refined beam theories based on a unified formulation. Int J Appl Mech2010; 2: 117–143.
39.
KimJSwansonSR. Design of sandwich structures for concentrated loading. Compos Struct2001; 52: 365–373.
40.
GiuntaGDe PietroGNasserH, et al.A thermal stress finite element analysis of beam structures by hierarchical modelling. Compos Part B: Eng2016; 95: 179–195.
41.
De PietroGHuiYGiuntaG, et al.Hierarchical one-dimensional finite elements for the thermal stress analysis of three-dimensional functionally graded beams. Compos Struct2016; 153: 514–528.
