Compression load-carrying capacity of 3D-integrated weft-knitted spacer composites

Abstract

Recent developments in composite manufacturing have been resulted in formation of newly-known 3D integrated weft-knitted fabrics which can be used as the composites’ reinforcing materials. In this paper, the compression-resistivity of 3D composite panels reinforced with these newly designed 3D textile-preforms from E-glass fibers has been studied. Following this research, the composites mechanical functionality under flatwise and edgewise compression loadings was evaluated. Using VIP method, three groups of glass/epoxy composite with different core thicknesses and structural geometries were prepared. It was concluded that the compressive strength of the flat-wisely loaded samples would significantly decrease by increasing the thickness. Moreover, changing the composites’ geometrical shape leads to some changes in failure mode; in this regard, the produced single-decker U-shaped panels only suffer from the pure buckling failure, while the double-decker U-shaped panel failed due to a combination of facing bending stress, core shear stress, and buckling failure. Thickness changes are not as effective as structural geometry changes on the panels’ compress-resistivity under edgewise compression. As compared with the conventional 3D woven sandwich composites, it was approved that mechanical functionality of the produced 3D integrated weft-knitted spacer panels is completely improved so that they can be considered as good alternatives especially in building constructions.

Keywords

Advanced textile composites mechanical performance flatwise and edgewise compression E-glass reinforced materials composite panels buckling failure

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Karbhari

Zhao

. Use of composites for 21st century civil infrastructure. Comp Methods Appl Mech Eng 2000; 185: 433–454.

Tayeh BA, Abu Bakr BH, Johari MAM, et al. Utilization of ultra-high performance fiber concrete (UHFC) for rehabilitation – a review. The 2nd International Conference of Rehabilitation and Maintenance in Civil Engineering. Procedia Eng 2013; 54: 525–538.

Bakis

Bank

Brown

et al.

Fiber-reinforced polymer composites for construction-state-of-the-art review. J Compos Constr 2007; 6: 73–87.

Karbhari

Chin

Hunston

et al.

Durability gap analysis for fiber-reinforced polymer composites in civil infrastructure. J Compos Constr 2003; 7: 238–247.

Sadighi

Hosseini

. Finite element simulation and experimental study on mechanical behavior of 3D woven glass fiber composite sandwich panels. Compos B Eng 2013; 55: 158–166.

Vinson

. Sandwich structures. Appl Mech Rev 2001; 54: 201–214.

Wang

Cao

Qian

. Mechanical properties of three-dimensional fabric sandwich composites. J Eng Fib Fab 2014; 9: 1–7.

Belouettar

Abbadi

Azari

et al.

Experimental investigation of static and fatigue behaviour of composites honeycomb materials using four-point bending tests. Compos Struct 2009; 87: 265–273.

Vaidya

Ulven

Pillay

et al.

Impact damage of partly foam-filled co-injected honeycomb core sandwich composite. J Compos Mater 2003; 37: 263–319.

10.

Sharma

Gibson

Ayorinde

. Fatigue of foam and honeycomb core composite sandwich structures. J Sand Struct Mater 2006; 8: 263–320.

11.

Iyer

Sen

. Advanced composites materials in civil engineering structures. In: American Society of Civil Engineering Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, New York, 31 January–1 February 1991, pp.360–370, New York, NY.

12.

Ehlen

. Life-cycle costs of fiber-reinforced-polymer bridge decks. J Mater Civil Eng 1999; 11: 224–230.

13.

Vaidya

Nelson

Sinn

et al.

Processing and high strain rate impact response of multi-functional sandwich composites. Compos Struct 2001; 52: 429–440.

14.

Potluri

Kusak

Reddy

. Novel stitch-bonded sandwich composite structures. Compos Struct 2003; 59: 251–259.

15.

Hassanzadeh S, Hasani H and Zarrebini M. Utilization of the composite panels reinforced with 3D spacer weft knitted fabrics in lightweight building construction. In: Annual international civil, architecture and urbanism conference, Kharazmi Higher Institute of Science & Technology, Shiraz, Iran, 23 September 2915, paper No. icauc01-05610358s, pp.131–135.

16.

Velosa JC, fangueiro R, van Hattum FWJ, et al. Development of reinforced composite sandwich panels based on 3D Fabrics. In: 14th European conference on composite materials, Budapest, Hungary, 7-10 June 2010, paper No. 946-ECCM14 pp.946–954.

17.

Fan

Zhou

Yang

et al.

An experiment study on the failure mechanisms of woven textile sandwich panels under quasi-static loading. Compos B Eng 2010; 41: 686–692.

18.

Abounaim

Cherif

. Flat-knitted innovative three-dimensional spacer fabrics: a comparative solution for lightweight composite applications. Text Res J 2012; 82: 288–298.

19.

Zănoagă M and Tanasă F. Complex textile structures as reinforcement for advanced composite materials. In: International Conference of Scientific Paper, Brasov, Romania, 22–24 May 2014, pp. 1–7.

20.

Chen

Long

Liu

et al.

Mechanical properties of 3D-structure composites based on warp-knitted spacer fabrics. Autex Res J 2015; 15: 127–137.

21.

Fotsing

Leclerc

Sola

et al.

Mechanical properties of composite sandwich structures with core or face sheet discontinuities. Compos B Eng 2016; 88: 229–239.

22.

Jiang

Nie

et al.

Knitting technologies and tensile properties of a novel curved flat-knitted three-dimensional spacer fabrics. Autex Res J 2015; 15: 191–197.

23.

Shiah

Tseng

Hsu

et al.

Experimental characterization of an integrated sandwich composite using 3D woven fabrics as the core material. Thermoplast Compos Mater 2004; 17: 229–243.

24.

Fan

Zhou

Chen

et al.

Ductile deformation mechanisms and designing instruction for integrated woven textile sandwich composites. Compos Sci Technol 2012; 72: 1338–1343.

25.

Jin

Chen

Zhao

et al.

Failure mechanism of sandwich composites with orthotropic integrated woven corrugated cores: Experiments. Compos Struct 2013; 98: 53–58.

26.

Ünal

Hoffmann

Cherif

. Development of weft knitted spacer fabrics for composite materials. Melliand Int 2006; 12: 127–132.

27.

Abounaim

Diestel

Hoffmann

et al.

High performance thermoplastic composite from flat knitted multi-layer textile preform using hybrid yarn. Compos Sci Technol 2011; 71: 511–519.

28.

Anand

Three-dimensional fabric structures. Part 2 – three-dimensional knitted structures for technical textiles applications. In: Horrocks

Anand

(eds). Handbook of technical textiles: textile technical processes, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: The Netherlands, 2015, pp. 305–332.

29.

Hamedi

Hasani

Dibajian

. Numerical simulating the flexural properties of 3D weft-knitted spacer fabric reinforced composite. J Compos Mater 2017; 51: 1887–1899.

30.

Hassanzadeh S, Hasani H and Zarrebini M. Effects of cross-sectional shape on mechanical performances of new-designed FRP sandwich structures reinforced with 3D weft-knitted spacer fabrics. In: International conference on research in science and technology, Istanbul, 14 March 2016, pp.1–9.

31.

Hassanzadeh

Hasani

Zarrebini

. Thermoset composites reinforced by innovative 3D spacer weft-knitted fabrics with different cross-section profiles: materials and manufacturing process. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 2016; 91: 65–76.

32.

ASTM C365/C365M-16. Standard test method for flatwise compressive properties of sandwich cores, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, www.astm.org, https://www.astm.org/Standards/C365.htm (accessed 17 June 2017).

33.

ASTM C364/C364M-16. Standard test method for edgewise compressive strength of sandwich constructions, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, www.astm.org, https://www.astm.org/Standards/C364.htm (accessed 17 June 2017).

34.

Wang

Zhang

. Effect of structure on the mechanical behaviors of three-dimensional spacer fabric composites. Appl Compos Mater 2009; 16: 1–14.