A novel computationally efficient damage identification methodology for web core fiber-reinforced polymer composite bridges has been developed in this article based on multivariate adaptive regression splines in conjunction with a multi-objective goal-attainment optimization algorithm. The proposed damage identification methodology has been validated for several single and multiple damage cases. The performance of the efficient multivariate adaptive regression splines-based approach for the inverse system identification process is found to be quite satisfactory. An iterative scheme in conjunction with the multi-objective optimization algorithm coupled with multivariate adaptive regression splines is proposed to increase damage identification accuracy. The effect of noise on the proposed damage identification algorithm has also been addressed subsequently using a probabilistic framework. The multivariate adaptive regression splines-based damage identification algorithm is general in nature; therefore, in future it can be implemented to other structures.
Doebling SW, Farrar CR, Prime MB, et al. Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review. LANL report (LA-13070-MS), 1996.
2.
Just-AgostoFShafiqBSerranoD. Development of a damage detection scheme applicable to sandwich composites. J Sandwich Struct Mater2007; 9: 343–363.
3.
Moaveni1BHeXConte1JPet al.Damage identification of a composite beam using finite element model updating. Comput-Aid Civil Infrastruct Eng2008; 23: 339–359.
4.
FuYZLuZRLiuJK. Damage identification in plates using finite element model updating in time domain. J Sound Vibrat2013; 332: 7018–7032.
5.
PereraRFangSERuizA. Application of particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithms to multiobjective damage identification inverse problems with modelling errors. Meccanica2010; 45: 723–734.
6.
FangSEPereraR. A response surface based damage identification technique. Smart Mater Struct2009; 18: 065009–065009.
7.
NanayakkaraAFeihSMouritzAP. Experimental impact damage study of a z-pinned foam core sandwich composite. J Sandwich Struct Mater2012; 14: 469–486.
8.
NandaBMaityDMaitiDK. Crack assessment in frame structures using modal data and unified particle swarm optimization technique. Adv Struct Eng2014; 17: 747–768.
9.
NavabianNBozorgnasabMTaghipourRet al.Damage identification in plate-like structure using mode shape derivatives. Archive Appl Mech2016; 86: 819–830.
10.
Nguyen1KDChanTHTThambiratnamDP. Structural damage identification based on change in geometric modal strain energy–eigenvalue ratio. Smart Mater Struct2016; 25: 075032–075032.
StacheMGuettlerMMarburgSA. Precise non-destructive damage identification technique of long and slender structures based on modal data. J Sound Vibrat2016; 365: 89–101.
MaraVHaghaniRHarrysonP. Bridge decks of fibre reinforced polymer (FRP): a sustainable solution. Construct Build Mater2014; 50: 190–199.
15.
Bernard PP. Use of fibre reinforced polymer composites in bridge construction. State of the art in hybrid and all-composite structures. Master’s Thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Spain, 2011.
16.
PydahABhaskarK. An accurate discrete model for web-core sandwich plates. J Sandwich Struct Mater2016; 18: 474–500.
17.
KavianiboroujeniACloutierARodrigueD. Mechanical characterization of asymmetric high density polyethylene/hemp composite sandwich panels with and without a foam core. J Sandwich Struct Mater2015; 17: 748–765.
18.
DeySMukhopadhyayTAdhikariS. Stochastic free vibration analyses of composite doubly curved shells – a Kriging model approach. Compos Part B: Eng2015; 70: 99–112.
19.
DeySMukhopadhyayTAdhikariS. Stochastic free vibration analysis of angle-ply composite plates – a RS-HDMR approach. Compos Struct2015; 122: 526–536.
20.
DeySMukhopadhyayTKhodaparastHHet al.A response surface modelling approach for resonance driven reliability based optimization of composite shells. Periodica Polytechnica – Civil Eng2016; 60: 103–111.
21.
DeySMukhopadhyayTSahuSKet al.Effect of cutout on stochastic natural frequency of composite curved panels. Compos Part B: Eng2016; 105: 188–202.
22.
DeySMukhopadhyayTSpickenheuerAet al.Uncertainty quantification in natural frequency of composite plates – an Artificial neural network based approach. Adv Compos Lett2016; 25: 43–48.
23.
DeySMukhopadhyayTKhodaparastHHet al.Fuzzy uncertainty propagation in composites using Gram-Schmidt polynomial chaos expansion. Appl Math Model2016; 40: 4412–4428.
24.
DeySNaskarSMukhopadhyayTet al.Uncertain natural frequency analysis of composite plates including effect of noise – a polynomial neural network approach. Compos Struct2016; 143: 130–142.
25.
MukhopadhyayTNaskarSDeySet al.On quantifying the effect of noise in surrogate based stochastic free vibration analysis of laminated composite shallow shells. Compos Struct2016; 140: 798–805.
26.
DeySMukhopadhyayTSpickenheuerAet al.Bottom up surrogate based approach for stochastic frequency response analysis of laminated composite plates. Compos Struct2016; 140: 712–727.
27.
DeySMukhopadhyayTKhodaparastHHet al.Rotational and ply-level uncertainty in response of composite shallow conical shells. Compos Struct2015; 131: 594–605.
28.
DeySMukhopadhyayTSahuSKet al.Thermal uncertainty quantification in frequency responses of laminated composite plates. Compos Part B: Eng2015; 80: 186–197.
29.
MukhopadhyayTDeyTKChowdhuryRet al.Optimum design of FRP bridge deck: an efficient RS-HDMR based approach. Struct Multidiscipl Optimiz2015; 52: 459–477.
30.
DeySMukhopadhyayTKhodaparastHHet al.Stochastic natural frequency of composite conical shells. Acta Mech2015; 226: 2537–2553.
31.
Dey S, Mukhopadhyay T and Adhikari S. Metamodel based high-fidelity stochastic analysis of composite laminates: a concise review with critical comparative assessment. Compos Struct 2017; 171: 227–250.
32.
MukhopadhyayTChakrabortySDeySet al.A critical assessment of Kriging model variants for high-fidelity uncertainty quantification in dynamics of composite shells. Archive Computat Meth Eng. 2017; 24: 495–518.
33.
NaskarSMukhopadhyayTSriramulaSet al.Stochastic natural frequency analysis of damaged thin-walled laminated composite beams with uncertainty in micromechanical properties. Compos Struct2017; 160: 312–334.
34.
MukhopadhyayTDeyTKDeySet al.Optimization of fiber reinforced polymer web core bridge deck – a hybrid approach. Struct Eng Int2015; 25: 173–183.
35.
DeySMukhopadhyayTNaskarSet al.Probabilistic characterization for dynamics and stability of laminated soft core sandwich plates. J Sandwich Struct Mater2017. DOI: 10.1177/1099636217694229.
36.
MukhopadhyayTAdhikariS. Free vibration analysis of sandwich panels with randomly irregular honeycomb core. J Eng Mech2016; 142: 06016008–06016008.
37.
Metya S, Mukhopadhyay T, Adhikari S, et al. System reliability analysis of soil slopes with general slip surfaces using multivariate adaptive regression splines. Computers and Geotechnics 2017; 87: 212–228.
38.
Wang X, Liu Y and Antonsson EK. Fitting functions to data in high dimensional design spaces. Adv Des Automat. Paper No. DETC99/DAC-8622. Las Vegas, NV: ASME, 1999.
39.
MukhopadhyayTDeyTKChowdhuryRet al.Structural damage identification using response surface based multi-objective optimization: a comparative study. Arab J Sci Eng2015; 40: 1027–1044.
40.
MukhopadhyayTChowdhuryRChakrabartiA. Structural damage identification: a random sampling-high dimensional model representation approach. Adv Struct Eng2016; 19: 908–927.
41.
SobolIM. On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals. USSR Comput Math Math Phys1967; 7: 86–112.
42.
HastieTTibshiraniRFriedmanJ. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. 2nd ed, New York: Springer, 2009.
JoeSKuoFY. Remark on Algorithm 659: implementing Sobol’s quasirandom sequence generator. ACM Transact Math Software2003; 29: 49–57.
45.
HongHSHickernellFJ. Algorithm 823: implementing scrambled digital sequences. ACM Transact Math Software2003; 29: 95–109.
46.
MatousekJ. On the L2-discrepancy for anchored boxes. J Complexity1998; 14: 527–556.
47.
Matlab Version 8.2.0.701 (R2013b) (2013) MathWorks Inc.
48.
FriswellMIPennyJET. Crack modeling for structural health monitoring. Struct Health Monitor2002; 1: 139–148.
49.
Gembicki FW. Vector optimization for control with performance and parameter sensitivity indices. PhD Thesis, Western Reserve Univ., Cleveland, OH, 1974.
50.
LyonA. Why are normal distributions normal?Br J Philos Sci2014; 65: 621–649.
51.
DeyTKMukhopadhyayTChakrabartiAet al.Efficient lightweight design of FRP bridge deck. Proc Inst Civil Eng – Struct Build2015; 168: 697–707.
52.
ArefAJAlampalliSHeY. Ritz-based static analysis method for fiber reinforced plastic rib core skew bridge superstructure. J Eng Mech2001; 127: 450–458.
53.
MukherjeeDRaoBNPrasadAM. Global sensitivity analysis of unreinforced masonry structure using high dimensional model representation. Eng Struct2011; 33: 1316–1325.
54.
BurhenneSTsvetkovaOJacobDet al.Uncertainty quantification for combined building performance and cost-benefit analyses. Build Environ2013; 62: 143–154.
