This paper presents an experimental investigation on impact response of sandwich composite panels with different face-sheet thicknesses. A number of low velocity impact tests were performed under various impact energies. The damage process of the sandwich composites consisted of glass/epoxy face-sheets, and foam cores are analyzed from cross-examining some graphs such as load–deflection curves and damaged specimens. The primary damage modes observed are fiber fractures at upper and lower skins, delaminations between adjacent glass-epoxy layers, and core shear fractures.
HosurMVAbdullahMJeelaniS. Manufacturing and low-velocity impact characterization of foam filled 3-D integrated core sandwich composites with hybrid face sheets. Compos Struct2005; 69: 167–181.
8.
ZenkertDShipshaABullP. Damage tolerance assessment of composite sandwich panels with localised damage. Compos Sci Technol2005; 65: 2597–2611.
9.
FreemanBSchwinglerEMahinfalahM. The effect of low-velocity impact on the fatigue life of Sandwich composites. Compos Struct2005; 70: 374–381.
10.
SchubelPMLuoJ-JDanielIM. Low velocity impact behavior of composite sandwich panels. Compos: Part A2005; 36: 1389–1398.
11.
SchubelPMLuoJ-JDanielIM. Impact and post impact behavior of composite sandwich panels. Compos: Part A2007; 38: 1051–1057.
12.
HosurMVMohammedAAJeelaniS. Processing of nanoclay filled sandwich composites and their response to impact loading. J Reinf Plast Compos2008; 27: 797–818.
13.
AtasCSevimC. On the impact response of sandwich composites with cores of balsa wood and PVC foam. Compos Struct2010; 93: 40–48.
14.
XiaFWuX. Work on low-velocity impact properties of foam sandwich composites with various face sheets. J Reinf Plast Compos2010; 29: 1045–1054.
15.
NanayakkaraAFeihSMouritzAP. Experimental impact damage study of a Z-pinned foam core sandwich. J Sandwich Struct Mater2012; 14: 469–486.
16.
ZhouJHassanMZGuanZ. The low velocity impact response of foam-based sandwich panels. Compos Sci Technol2012; 72: 1781–1790.
17.
LangdonGSvon KlempererCJRowlandBK. The response of sandwich structures with composite face sheets and polymer foam cores to air-blast loading: Preliminary experiments. Eng Struct2012; 36: 104–112.
18.
ZhouJGuanZWCantwellWJ. The impact response of graded foam sandwich structures. Compos Struct2013; 97: 370–377.
19.
HassanMZCantwellWJ. The influence of core properties on the perforation resistance of sandwich structures-An experimental study. Compos Part B: Eng2012; 43: 3231–3238.
20.
NasirzadehRSabetAR. Study of foam density variations in composite sandwich panels under high velocity impact loading. Int J Impact Eng2014; 63: 129–139.
21.
RajaneeshASridharIRajendranS. Relative performance of metal and polymeric foam sandwich plates under low velocity impact. Int J Impact Eng2014; 65: 126–136.
22.
ZhangGWangBMaL. Energy absorption and low velocity impact response of polyurethane foam filled pyramidal lattice core sandwich panels. Compos Struct2014; 108: 304–310.
23.
FardKMKhaliliSMRForooghySH. Low velocity transverse impact response of a composite sandwich plate subjected to a rigid blunted cylindrical impactor. Compos: Part B2014; 63: 111–122.
24.
SachseSPoruriMSilvaF. Effect of nanofillerson low energy impact performance of sandwich structures with nanoreinforced polyurethane foam cores. J Sandwich Struct Mater2014; 16: 173–194.
25.
AkatayABoraMOCobanO. The influence of low velocity repeated impacts on residual compressive properties of honeycomb sandwich structures. Compos Struct2015; 125: 425–433.
26.
YangPShamsSSSlayA. Evaluation of temperature effects on low velocity impact damage in composite sandwich panels with polymeric foam cores. Compos Struct2015; 129: 213–223.
27.
YangBWangZZhouL. Study on the low-velocity impact response and CAI behavior of foam-filled sandwich panels with hybrid facesheet. Compos Struct2015; 132: 1129–1140.
28.
AtasCLiuD. Impact response of woven composites with small weaving angles. Int J Impact Eng2008; 35: 80–97.
