The crushing of single- and double-layer zig-zag trapezoidal corrugated core sandwiches was investigated experimentally and numerically at quasi-static and dynamic rates. The buckling stress of sandwiches increased when the rate increased from quasi-static to dynamic. The increased buckling stresses were ascribed to the micro-inertial effects, which altered the buckling mode of the core from three plastic hinges to higher number of plastic hinge formations. The initial buckling stress was numerically shown to be imperfection sensitive when the imperfection size was comparable with the buckling length. The numerical buckling stresses of zig-zag and straight corrugated cores were similar, while higher inertial effects were found in triangular corrugated core.
WadleyHNG. Multifunctional periodic cellular metals. Philos Trans R Soc A-Math Phys Eng Sci2006; 364: 31–68.
2.
RadfordDDFleckNADeshpandeVS. The response of clamped sandwich beams subjected to shock loading. Int J Impact Eng2006; 32: 968–987.
3.
LeeSBarthelatFHutchinsonJW. Dynamic failure of metallic pyramidal truss core materials – experiments and modeling. Int J Plasticity2006; 22: 2118–2145.
4.
TilbrookMTRadfordDDDeshpandeVS. Dynamic crushing of sandwich panels with prismatic lattice cores. Int J Solids Struct2007; 44: 6101–6123.
5.
YungwirthCJWadleyHNGO’ConnorJH. Impact response of sandwich plates with a pyramidal lattice core. Int J Impact Eng2008; 35: 920–936.
6.
RubinoVDeshpandeVFleckN. The dynamic response of end-clamped sandwich beams with a Y-frame or corrugated core. Int J Impact Eng2008; 35: 829–844.
7.
RubinoVDeshpandeVSFleckNA. The dynamic response of clamped rectangular Y-frame and corrugated core sandwich plates. Eur J Mech A-Solid2009; 28: 14–24.
8.
McShaneGJDeshpandeVSFleckNA. Underwater blast response of free-standing sandwich plates with metallic lattice cores. Int J Impact Eng2010; 37: 1138–1149.
9.
LiangYLoucaLHobbsR. Corrugated panels under dynamic loads. Int J Impact Eng2007; 34: 1185–1201.
10.
CoteFDeshpandeVFleckN. The compressive and shear responses of corrugated and diamond lattice materials. Int J Solids Struct2006; 43: 6220–6242.
11.
McShaneGJPingleSMDeshpandeVS. Dynamic buckling of an inclined strut. Int J Solids Struct2012; 49: 2830–2838.
12.
CalladineCREnglishRW. Strain-rate and inertia effects in the collapse of two types of energy-absorbing structure. Int J Mech Sci1984; 26: 689–701.
13.
ZhaoHElnasriIAbdennadherS. An experimental study on the behaviour under impact loading of metallic cellular materials. Int J Mech Sci2005; 47: 757–774.
14.
LangsethMHopperstadOS. Static and dynamic axial crushing of square thin-walled aluminium extrusions. Int J Impact Eng1996; 18: 949–968.
15.
PaulARamamurtyU. Strain rate sensitivity of a closed-cell aluminum foam. Mater Sci Eng A Struct2000; 281: 1–7.
16.
ReidSRPengC. Dynamic uniaxial crushing of wood. Int J Impact Eng1997; 19: 531–570.
17.
TagarielliVLDeshpandeVSFleckNA. The high strain rate response of PVC foams and end-grain balsa wood. Compos Part B-Eng2008; 39: 83–91.
18.
ZhangYCZhangSLWangZLCrush behavior of corrugated cores sandwich panels. In: ZhouM (ed). High performance structures and materials engineering, pts 1 and 2, Stafa-Zurich: Trans Tech Publications Ltd, 2011, pp. 1584–1589.
19.
KilicaslanCOdaciIKTasdemirciA. Experimental testing and full and homogenized numerical models of the low velocity and dynamic deformation of the trapezoidal aluminium corrugated core sandwich. Strain2014; 50: 236–249.
20.
KilicaslanCGudenMOdaciIK. The impact responses and the finite element modeling of layered trapezoidal corrugated aluminum core and aluminum sheet interlayer sandwich structures. Mater Des2013; 46: 121–133.
21.
E 8M-04: Standard specification for standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials ASTM Standard. ASTM International, 2004.
GumrukRKaradenizS. A numerical study of the influence of bump type triggers on the axial crushing of top hat thin-walled sections. Thin Wall Struct2008; 46: 1094–1106.
24.
Johnson W and Mamalis AG. A survey of some physical defects arising in metal working processes. In: Proceedings of the 17th International MTDR Conference. Birmingham, U.K., September 1976, Macmillan, London, 1977, pp.607–21.
25.
SmerdRWinklerSSalisburyC. High strain rate tensile testing of automotive aluminum alloy sheet. Int J Impact Eng2005; 32: 541–560.
26.
SantosaSPWierzbickiTHanssenAG. Experimental and numerical studies of foam-filled sections. Int J Impact Eng2000; 24: 509–534.
ZhangJSupernakPMueller-AlanderS. Improving the bending strength and energy absorption of corrugated sandwich composite structure. Mater Des2013; 52: 767–773.
29.
TamLLCalladineCR. Inertia and strain-rate effects in a simple plate-structure under impact loading. Int J Impact Eng1991; 11: 349–377.
30.
ZhangTGYuTX. A note on a velocity sensitive energy-absorbing structure. Int J Impact Eng1989; 8: 43–51.
31.
SuXYYuTXReidSR. Inertia-sensitive impact energy-absorbing structures part II: effect of strain-rate. Int J Impact Eng1995; 16: 673–689.
32.
SuXYYuTXReidSR. Inertia-sensitive impact energy-absorbing structures part I: effects of inertia and elasticity. Int J Impact Eng1995; 16: 651–672.
