A generalized analytical approach to investigate the indentation of sandwich beams under concentrated loads is presented, based on the Winkler foundation theory. A segment-wise model is implemented to the case of fully backed sandwich beams with polymeric foam cores exhibiting generic non-linear compressive behaviours. Closed-form analytical solutions of the indentation curve are obtained for simplified foam compression behaviours: elastic-perfectly-plastic, bilinear and bilinear-perfectly-plastic. Analytical predictions are compared with experimental data from sandwiches employing foam cores with peculiar non-linear behaviours. The proposed models are found to give a better match of the experimental data than the classic elastic-perfectly-plastic model.
Plantema FJSandwich construction. New York: Wiley, 1966.
2.
Allen HGAnalysis and design of structural sandwich panels. London : Pergamon Press, 1969.
3.
Abrate S.Localized impact on sandwich structures with laminated facings. Appl Mech Rev1997; 50: 69-82.
4.
Zenkert D., Shipsha A. and Persson K.Static indentation and unloading response of sandwich beams. Compos Part B2004; 35: 511-522.
5.
Koissin V. and Shipsha A.Residual dent in locally loaded foam core sandwich structures: analysis and use for NDI. Compos Sci Technol2008; 68: 57-74.
6.
Steeves CA and Fleck NACollapse mechanisms of sandwich beams with composite faces and a foam core, loaded in three-point bending part I: analytical models and minimum weight design. Int J Mech Sci2004; 46: 561-583.
7.
Steeves CA and Fleck NAMaterial selection in sandwich beam construction. Scripta Materialia2004; 50: 1335-1339.
8.
Tagarielli VL , Fleck NA and Deshpande VSCollapse of clamped and simply supported composite sandwich beams in three-point bending . Compos Part B2004; 35: 523-534.
9.
Petras A. and Sutcliffe MPF.Indentation resistance of sandwich beams. Compos Struct1999; 46: 413-424.
10.
Frostig Y., Baruch M., Vilnay O. and Sheinman I.High-order theory for sandwich-beam behavior with transversely flexible core . J Eng Mech-ASCE1992; 118: 1026-1043.
11.
Frostig Y.Classical and high-order computational models in the analysis of modern sandwich panels. Compos Part B2003; 34: 83-100.
12.
Petras A. and Sutcliffe MPF.Indentation failure analysis of sandwich beams. Compos Struct2000; 50: 311-318.
13.
Sokolinsky VS , Shen H., Vaikhanski L. and Nutt SRExperimental and analytical study of nonlinear bending response of sandwich beams. Compos Struct2003; 60: 219-229.
14.
Kim J. and Swanson SRDesign of sandwich structures for concentrated loading. Compos Struct2001; 52: 365-373.
15.
Schwarts-Givli H. and Frostig Y.High-order behavior of sandwich panels with a bilinear transversely flexible core. Compos Struct2001; 53: 87-106.
16.
Shen H., Sokolinsky VS and Nutt SRAccurate predictions of bending deflections for soft-core sandwich beams subject to concentrated loads. Compos Struct2004; 64: 115-122.
17.
Saadati M. and Sadighi M.Indentation in lightweight composite sandwich beams. Proc IMechE Part G J Aerosp Eng2009; 223: 825-835.
18.
Weissman-Berman D., Petrie GL and Wang MHFlexural response of foam-cored sandwich panels . New York: The Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers (SNAME), 1988.
19.
Meyer-Piening HRRemarks on higher order sandwich stress and deflection analyses. In: Olsson KA and Reichard RP (eds) Sandwich Construction, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Sandwich Construction. Stockholm, Vol. 1, 1989, pp.107-127.
20.
Abot JL, Daniel IM and Gdoutos EEContact law for composite sandwich beams. J Sandw Struct Mater2002; 4: 157-173.
21.
Koissin V., Shipaha A. and Rizov V.The inelastic quasi-static response of sandwich structures to local loading . Compos Struct2004; 64: 129-138.
22.
Thomsen OTAnalysis of local bending effects in sandwich plates with orthotropic face layers subjected to localised loading. Compos Struct1993; 25: 511-520.
23.
Thomsen OTTheoretical and experimental investigation of local bending effects in sandwich plates. Compos Struct1995; 30: 85-101.
24.
Lee SM and Tsotsis TKIndentation failure behaviour of honeycomb sandwich panels. Compos Sci Technol2000; 60: 1147-1159.
25.
Yang M. and Qiao P.Nonlinear impact analysis of fully backed composite sandwich structures . Compos Sci Technol2005; 65: 551-562.
26.
Vlasov VZ and Leont’ev NNBeams, plates and shells on elastic foundations. Moscow , 1960 (Published by Israel Program for Scientific Translation, Jerusalem, 1966).
Shuaeib FM and Soden PDIndentation failure of composite sandwich beams. Compos Sci Technol1997; 57: 1249-1259.
29.
Minakuchi S. , Okabe Y. and Takeda N.‘Segment-wise model’ for theoretical simulation of barely visible indentation damage in composite sandwich beams: part I-formulation. Composites Part A2008 ; 39: 133-144.
30.
Lim TS, Lee CS and Lee DGFailure modes of foam core sandwich beams under static and impact loads. J Compos Mater2004; 38: 1639-1662.
31.
Sadighi M. and Pouriayevali H.Quasi-static and low-velocity impact response of fully backed or simply supported sandwich beams. J Sandw Struct Mater2008; 10: 499-524.
32.
Rizov VINon-linear indentation behaviour of foam core sandwich composite materials-a 2D approach. Comp Mater Sci2006; 35: 107-115.
33.
Flores-Johnson EA, Li QM and Mines RAW.Degradation of elastic modulus of progressively-crushable foams in uniaxial compression . J Cell Plast2008; 44/5: 415-434.
34.
Li QM, Mines RAW and Birch RSThe crush behaviour of Rohacell-51WF structural foam. Int J Solids Struct2000; 37: 6321-6341.
35.
Ogden RWRecent advances in the phenomenological theory of rubber elasticity . Rubber Chem Technol1986; 59: 361-383.
36.
Liang G. and Chandrashekhara K.Neural network based constitutive model for elastomeric foams. Eng Struct2008; 30: 2002-2011.
