In recent years, proactivity has become an essential component of evidence-based policing. However, research indicates that the day-to-day practice of proactivity is limited, inconsistent, and variable. In this study, we examine individual and organizational factors that may account for this variability using survey responses from a large suburban police agency in the Northeast U.S. Specifically, we assess the relationship between officer perceptions of organizational, individual, and external characteristics and their self-reported frequency of proactivity. Our results speak strongly to the importance of the organizational and structural environment. Officers who report higher expectations to be proactive, report stronger reward structures for proactivity, and feel more prepared to handle a variety of situations report significantly higher levels of proactivity. These findings are particularly strong for non-traditional and evidence-based forms of proactivity. Our findings provide preliminary guidance to agencies seeking to increase the use of proactive policing strategies during officers’ discretionary time.
AmayaA.PresserS. (2017). Nonresponse bias for univariate and multivariate estimates of social activities and roles. Public Opinion Quarterly, 81(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw037
2.
AnkonyR. C.KelleyT. M. (1999). The impact of perceived alienation on police officers’ sense of mastery and subsequent motivation for proactive enforcement. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 22(2), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639519910271193
3.
BarnardC. (1938). Functions of the executive. Harvard University Press.
4.
BatemanT. S.CrantJ. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030140202
BlackM. (2015). Improving company production: The role of organizational incentives in enhancing employee discretionary effort. Journal of Student Research, 4(1), 130–135. https://doi.org/10.47611/jsr.v4i1.212
8.
BoehmeH. M.MourtgosS. M. (2024). The effect of formal de-policing on police traffic stop behavior and crime: Early evidence from LAPD’s policy to restrict discretionary traffic stops. Criminology & Public Policy, 23(3), 517–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12673
9.
BradfordB.QuintonP. (2014). Self-legitimacy, police culture and support for democratic policing in an English constabulary. British Journal of Criminology, 54(6), 1023–1046. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azu053
10.
BragaA. A.SchnellC.WelshB. C. (2024). Disorder policing to reduce crime: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Criminology & Public Policy, 23(3), 745–775. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12667
11.
BragaA. A.TurchanB.PapachristosA. V.HureauD. M. (2019). Hot spots policing of small geographic areas effects on crime. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 15(3), Article e1046. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1046
12.
ColquittJason A.GreenbergJ.Zapata-PhelanC. P. (2013). What is organizational justice? A historical overview. In GreenbergJeraldColquittJason A. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice (pp. 3–56). Psychology Press.
13.
CortinaJ. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.78.1.98
CrichlowV. J.DeucharR.FallikS. W. (2020). Person-based proactivity and community relations: Examining police perspectives in troubled times. Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice & Criminology, 9(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.21428/88de04a1.bcd06cf2
16.
CronbachL. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02310555
17.
den HeyerG. (2022). Evidence-based policing: A review of its adoption and use by police agencies in the United States of America. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 69, 100532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2022.100532
18.
EdmondT.MegivernD.WilliamsC.RochmanE.HowardM. (2006). Integrating evidence-based practice and social work field education. Journal of Social Work Education, 42(2), 377–396. https://doi.org/10.5175/jswe.2006.200404115
19.
EneglR. S.WordenR. E. (2003). Police officers’ attitudes, behavior, and supervisory influences: An analysis of problem solving. Criminology, 41(1), 131–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb00984.x
FamegaC. N. (2005). Variation in officer downtime: A review of the research. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 28(3), 388–414. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510510614528
22.
FamegaC. N.FrankJ.MazerolleL. (2005). Managing police patrol time: The role of supervisor directives. Justice Quarterly, 22(4), 540–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820500364692
23.
FowlerF. J. (2014). Survey research methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.
24.
FrankJ.BrandlS. G.WatkinsC. R. (1997). The content of community policing: A comparison of the daily activities of community and “beat” officers. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 20(4), 716–728.
25.
FreseM.FayD. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-3085(01)23005-6
26.
FreseM.ZapfD. (1994). Action as the core of work psychology: A German approach. In TriandisH. C.DunnetteM. D.HoughL. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 271–340). Consulting Psychologists Press.
27.
Fuller JrB.MarlerL. E. (2009). Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.05.008
28.
GarvinM. (2022). Relationship among department satisfaction, training, and police behavior. [Master’s thesis, University of Southern Mississippi]. https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/933/
29.
GillC.WeisburdD.TelepC. W.VitterZ.BennettT. (2014). Community-oriented policing to reduce crime, disorder and fear and increase satisfaction and legitimacy among citizens: A systematic review. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10(4), 399–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-014-9210-y
GriffinM. A.NealA.ParkerS. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24634438
32.
GrovesR. M.PeytchevaE. (2008). The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias: A meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(2), 167–189. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn011
33.
GuoL.Wong-On-WingB.LuiG. (2012). Motivational effects of linking incentives to different measures in strategic performance measurement systems: Implications for proactive strategic behavior. In EpsteinM. J.LeeJ. Y. (Eds.), Advances in management accounting (pp. 209–240). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
34.
HanafiA. S. (2019). Effect of organizational structure, job analysis and leadership style on work motivation and its impact on performance of employees. Journal of Public Administration Studies, 4(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jpas.2019.004.01.8
HeggestadE. D.RogelbergS.GohA.OswaldF. L. (2015). Considering the effects of nonresponse on correlations between surveyed variables: A simulation study to provide context to evaluate survey results. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 14(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000129
38.
HinkleJ. C.WeisburdD.TelepC. W.PetersenK. (2020). Problem-oriented policing for reducing crime and disorder: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 16(2), Article e1089. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1089
39.
HinkleJ. C.WeisburdD.TelepC. W.PetersenK. (2024). When is problem-oriented policing most effective? A systematic examination of heterogeneity in effect sizes for reducing crime and disorder. Policing: Journal of Policy Practice, 18, paae053. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paae053
40.
HutabaratW. (2015). Do organizational structure and organizational culture affect teachers’ work motivation to some extent. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 20(2), 350–362. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/249334452.pdf
41.
JohnsonR. R. (2011). Officer attitudes and management influences on police work productivity. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(4), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-010-9090-2
42.
JohnsonR. R. (2015). Leading by example: Supervisor modeling and officer-initiated activities. Police Quarterly, 18(3), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611115570896
43.
JonesM. (2008). A complexity science view of modern police administration. Public Administration Quarterly, 32(3), 433–457. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41288325
44.
KalyalH. (2020). ‘One person’s evidence is another person’s nonsense’: Why police organizations resist evidence-based practices. Policing: Journal of Policy Practice, 14(4), 1151–1165. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pay106
45.
KellingG. L.PateT.DieckmanD.BrownC. E. (1974). The Kansas City prevention patrol experiment. The Police Foundation.
46.
KhanizadehA.-J.BlaskovitsB.BennellC.HueyL. (2023). Receptivity to research in policing: Results from a survey of Canadian police professionals. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 25(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/14613557231156752
47.
KoperC. S.LumC.WuX.FritzN. (2020). Proactive policing in the United States: A national survey. Policing: International Journal, 43(5), 861–876. https://doi.org/10.1108/pijpsm-06-2020-0086
48.
KuenK.LumC.KimS. H. (2023). What makes police officers resist research and evidence-based policing? Examining the role of organizational and environmental factors. Policing: Journal of Policy Practice, 17, paad051. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paad051
49.
KyriazosT. A. (2018). Applied psychometrics: Sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology, 9(8), 2207–2230. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.98126
50.
LawsD.HajerM. (2006). Policy in practice. In The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 409–424). Oxford University Press.
51.
LipskyM. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy. Russell Sage.
52.
LumC.KoperC. S. (2017). Evidence based policing: Translating research into practice. Oxford University Press.
LumC.KoperC. S.WuX.JohnsonW.StoltzM. (2020). Examining the empirical realities of proactive policing through systematic observations and computer-aided dispatch data. Police Quarterly, 23(3), 283–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611119896081
55.
LumC.SumwaltJ.KoperC. S.PetersenK. (2025). Institutionalizing evidence-based policing through a case of place approach in Suffolk county, New York. Justice Evaluation Journal, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/24751979.2025.2474099
56.
LumC.TelepC. W.KoperC. S.GriecoJ. (2012). Receptivity to research in policing. Justice Research and Policy, 14(1), 61–95. https://doi.org/10.3818/jrp.14.1.2012.61
57.
LumsdenK. (2017). Police officer and civilian staff receptivity to research and evidence-based policing in the UK: Providing a contextual understanding through qualitative interviews. Policing: Journal of Policy Practice, 11(2), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paw036
58.
MacDonaldJ. M. (2019). De-policing as a consequence of the so-called Ferguson effect. Criminology & Public Policy, 18(1), 47–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12430
59.
MastrofskiS. D.ParksR. B.ReissA. J.Jr.WordenR. E.DeJongC.SnipesJ. B.TerrillW. (1998). Systematic observation of public police: Applying field research methods to policy issues. National Institute of Justice.
60.
MastrofskiS. D.RittiR. R. (1996). Police training and the effects of organization on drunk driving enforcement. Justice Quarterly, 13(2), 291–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829600092951
61.
MastrofskiS. D.RittiR. R.SnipesJ. B. (1994). Expectancy theory and police productivity in dui enforcement. Law & Society Review, 28(1), 113–148. https://doi.org/10.2307/3054139
MitchellT. R. (1974). Expectancy models of job satisfaction, occupational preference and effort: A theoretical, methodological, and empirical appraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 81(12), 1053–1077. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037495
64.
NasutionM.YeniS.YondraA.PutriA. (2021). The influence of organizational structure and job analysis on work motivation and its impact on the performance of the office of cooperatives for small and medium enterprises, industry and trade (KOPERINDAG) Mentawai Islands Regency. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 5(1), 444–453. https://www.ajhssr.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/ZZC21501444453.pdf
65.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2018). Proactive policing: Effects on crime and communities. The National Academies Press.
66.
NixJ.PickettJ. T.BaekH.AlpertG. P. (2017). Police research, officer surveys, and response rates. Policing and Society, 29(5), 530–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2017.1394300
Paoline IIIE. A.GauJ. M. (2020). An empirical assessment of the sources of police job satisfaction. Police Quarterly, 23(1), 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611119875117
69.
ParkerS. K.WilliamsH. M.TurnerN. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 636–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
70.
PetersenK.WeisburdD.HinkleJ. C.TelepC. W.FayS. (2024). Does level of geography influence proactive policing’s impact on crime? A synthesis of systematic reviews of three evidence-based policing strategies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 78, 101988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2024.101988
71.
RaabeB.FreseM.BeehrT. A. (2007). Action regulation theory and career self-management. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70(2), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2006.10.005
72.
R Core Team. (2024). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
73.
SaddS.GrincR. M. (1996). Implementation challenges in community policing: Innovative neighborhood-oriented policing in eight cities. U.S. Department of Justice.
74.
ShengY. P.PearsonM.CrosbyL. (2003). Organizational culture and employees’ computer self-efficacy: An empirical study. Information Resources Management Journal, 16(3), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2003070103
75.
ShjarbackJ. A.PyroozD. C.WolfeS. E.DeckerS. H. (2017). De-policing and crime in the wake of Ferguson: Racialized changes in the quantity and quality of policing among Missouri police departments. Journal of Criminal Justice, 50, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2017.04.003
StraussK.ParkerS. K. (2018). Intervening to enhance proactivity in organizations: Improving the present or changing the future. Journal of Management, 44(3), 1250–1278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315602531
78.
TanakaJ. S. (1987). How big is big enough? Sample size and goodness of fit in struc-tural equation models with latent variables. Child Development, 58(1), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130296
79.
TelepC. W. (2017). Police officer receptivity to research and evidence-based policing: Examining variability within and across agencies. Crime & Delinquency, 63(8), 976–999. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128716642253
80.
TelepC. W.LumC. (2014). The receptivity of officers to empirical research and evidence-based policing: An examination of survey data from three agencies. Police Quarterly, 17(4), 359–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611114548099
81.
TelepC. W.SomersL. J. (2019). Examining police officer definitions of evidence-based policing: Are we speaking the same language?Policing and Society, 29(2), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2017.1373775
82.
TelepC. W.WinegarS. (2016). Police executive receptivity to research: A survey of chiefs and sheriffs in Oregon. Policing, 10(3), 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pav043
83.
TregleB.MourtgosS. M. (2024). Burning questions: Investigating officer support for hot spots policing. Police Practice and Research, 26(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2024.2435044
VroomV.PorterL.LawlerE. (2015). Expectancy theories. In MinerJohn B. (Ed.), Organizational behavior (pp. 94–113). Routledge.
86.
WangensteenS.JohanssonI.BjorkstromM.NordstromG. (2011). Research utilisation and critical thinking among newly graduated nurses: Predictors for research use. A quantitative cross–sectional study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 20(17-18), 2436–2447. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03629.x
87.
WeisburdD.EckJ. E. (2004). What can police do to reduce crime, disorder, and fear?The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(1), 42–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203262548
88.
WeisburdD. L.WooditchA.WeisburdS.YangS.-M. (2016). Do stop, question, and frisk practices deter crime? Evidence at microunits of space and time. Criminology & Public Policy & Public Policy, 14(1), 31–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12172
89.
WeissC.BucuvalasM. J. (1980). Social science research and decision–making. Columbia University Press.
90.
WhitakerG. P.MastrofskiS.OstromE.ParksR. B.PercyS. L. (1982). Basic issues in police performance. National Institute of Justice.
91.
WolfeS. E.LawsonS. G. (2020). The organizational justice effect among criminal justice employees: A meta‐analysis. Criminology, 58(4), 619–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12251
92.
WuC.-H.ParkerS. K.BindlU. K. (2013). Who is proactive and why? Unpacking individual differences in employee proactivity. In BakkerA. B. (Ed.), Advances in positive organizational psychology (1, pp. 261–280). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/s2046-410x(2013)0000001014
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
