This study examines the reorganization of robbery detectives from a decentralized to centralized model in one large department, with the purpose of understanding whether organizational structure affects robbery clearance. Time-series regression models (Auto-Regressive, Integrated, Moving Average) demonstrate that the percentage of investigation-eligible robberies cleared by arrest increased and reported robberies decreased subsequent to the reorganization. Additionally, interviews indicated organizational changes in case processing with respect to information collection and use, cooperation among detectives and other police, and the police–prosecutor interface. The organization of robbery detectives appears to be important to case clearances and crime reduction. A more comprehensive research program on police investigations is recommended to fully assess the costs and benefits of detective configurations.
AckroydS.HarperR.HughesJ. A.ShapiroD.SoothillK. (1992) New technology and practical police work, Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
2.
AngellJ. (1971) Toward a alternative to the classical police organizational arrangements: A democratic model. Criminology9: 185–206.
3.
BayleyD. A. (1998) What works in policing?, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
BoxG.JenkinsG. (1976) Time series analysis: Forecasting and control, San Francisco, CA: Holden Day.
5.
BragaA.FlynnE. A.KellingG. L.ColeC. M. (2011) Moving the work of the criminal investigator towards crime control, Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.
6.
BrandlS. (1993) The impact of case characteristics on detectives’ decision making. Justice Quarterly10: 395–415.
7.
BrandlS.FrankJ. (1994) The relationship between evidence, detective effort, and the disposition of burglary and robbery investigations. American Journal of Police13: 149–168.
8.
BrownM. K. (1988) Working the street: Police discretion and the dilemmas of reform, New York, NY: Russell Sage.
9.
ChaikenJ.ChaikenM. (1982) Varieties of criminal behavior, Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
10.
ChanJ. (2001) The technological game: How information technology is transforming police practice. Criminology and Criminal Justice1: 139–159.
11.
ClareJ. (2010) Examination of systematic variations in burglars’ domain-specific perceptual and procedural skills. Psychology, Crime & Law17: 199–124.
12.
DanzigerJ. N.KraemerK. L. (1985) Computerized data-based decision systems and productivity among professional workers: The case of detectives. Public Administration Review45: 196–209.
13.
DeanG.FahsingI. A.GottschalkP. (2007) Creativity as a determinant of thinking style in police investigations. International Journal of Police Science & Management9: 112–121.
14.
DurlaufS.NaginD. (2011) Imprisonment and crime: Can both be reduced?Criminology & Public Policy10: 13–54.
15.
EckJ. E. (1983) Solving crimes: The investigation of burglary and robbery, Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
16.
EckJ. E. (1992) What works in policing? Operations and administration examined. In: CordnerG.HaleD. C. (eds) Criminal investigations, Cincinnati, OH: Anderson, pp. 19–34.
17.
EtzioniA. (1960) Two approaches to organizational analysis: A critique and a suggestion. Administrative Science Quarterly5: 257–278.
18.
EtzioniA. (1961) A comparative analysis of complex organizations, New York, NY: Free Press.
19.
FeeleyM. M (1973) Two models of the criminal justice system. Law & Society Review7: 407–425.
20.
GainesL. K.LewisB.SwanaginR. (1983) Case screening in criminal investigations: A case study of robbery. Police Studies6: 22–29.
21.
GoldsteinH. (1977) Policing a free society, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
22.
GreenwoodP. W.ChaikenJ.PetersiliaJ.PrusoffL. (1975) The criminal investigation process: Observations and analysisVol. 3Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
23.
GreenwoodP. W.PetersiliaJ. (1975) The criminal investigation process: Summary and policy implicationsVol. 1Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
24.
HarperR. R (1991) The computer game: Detectives, suspects, and technology. British Journal of Criminology31: 292–307.
25.
HickmanM. J.ReavesB. A. (2006) Sheriff’s offices, 2003, Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
26.
HorvathF.MeesigR.LeeY. (2001) National survey of police policies and practices regarding the criminal investigations process: Twenty-five years after Rand, East Lansing: Michigan State University.
27.
IrvingB. (1980) Police interrogation: A case study of correct practice. Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure (Research Study No. 1, pp. 75–153), London, England: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office (HMSO).
28.
KenneyD.WhiteM.RuffinengoM. (2010) Expanding the role of patrol in criminal investigations: Houston’s investigative first responder project. Police Quarterly13(2): 136–160.
29.
KlockarsC. B. (1985) Idea of police, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
KlofasJ.McGarrellE.HippleN. K. (2010) The new criminal justice, New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
KnoblerP.BrattonW. (2009) The turnaround: How America’s top cop reversed the crime epidemic, New York, NY: Random House.
32.
KubrinC. E.MessnerS. F.DeaneG.McGeeverK.StuckyT. (2010) Proactive policing and robbery rates across U.S. cities. Criminology48: 57–97.
33.
MacDonaldJ. M. (2002) The effectiveness of community policing in reducing urban violence. Crime & Delinquency48: 592–618.
34.
MaguireE. R.UchidaC. D. (2000) Measurement and explanation in the comparative study of American police organizations. In: DuffeeD.McDowallD.OstromB.CrutchfieldR.MastrofskiS.MazerolleL. (eds) Criminal justice 2000: Measurement and analysis of crime and justice [NCJ 182411]Vol. 4Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice, pp. 491–557.
35.
MaguireM. (2003) Criminal investigation and crime control. In: NewburnT. (eds) Handbook of policing, Devon, England: Willan, pp. 430–464.
36.
ManningP. K. (1992) Information technology and the police. In: TonryM.MorrisN. (eds) Modern policing, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 349–398.
37.
McClearyR.HayR. (1980) Applied time series analysis, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
38.
McClearyR.NienstedtB.ErvenJ. (1982) Uniform crime reports as organizational outcomes. Social Problems29(4): 361–372.
39.
NorthropA.KraemerK. L.KingJ. L. (1995) Police use of computers. Journal of Criminal Justice23: 259–275.
40.
PackerH. (1968) The limits of the criminal sanction, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
41.
ReissA. J.BlackD. J. (1967) Interrogation and the criminal process. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science374: 47–57.
42.
RobertsA. (2008) The influences of incident and contextual characteristics on crime clearance of nonlethal violence: A multilevel event history analysis. Journal of Criminal Justice36: 61–71.
43.
SandersW. B. (1977) Detective work: A study of criminal investigations, New York, NY: Free Press.
44.
ScottW. R. (1992) Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems, 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
45.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
46.
ShermanL. W. (1990) Police crackdowns: Initial and residual deterrence. In: TonryM.MorrisN. (eds) Crime and justice: A review of research, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–48.
47.
ShermanL. W. (2011) Al Capone, the sword of Damocles, and the police–corrections budget ratio. Criminology & Public Policy10: 195–206.
48.
SimonH. (1947) Administration behavior, New York, NY: MacMillan Press.
49.
SkoganW.FrydlK. (2004) Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
50.
SkoganW. G.AntunesG. E. (1979) Information, apprehension, and deterrence: Exploring the limits of police productivity. Journal of Criminal Justice7: 217–241.
51.
SkolnickJ. (1967) Social control in the adversary system. Journal of Conflict Resolution11: 52–67.
52.
SmithB. (1960) Police systems in the United States, New York, NY: Harper Press.
53.
TarlingR. (1988) Police work and manpower allocation, London, England: Home Office Research and Planning Unit.
54.
VisherC. A. (1986) The Rand inmate survey: A reanalysis. In: BlumsteinA.CohenJ.RothJ. A.VisherC. A. (eds) Criminal careers and “career criminals”, Washington, DC: National Academies Press, pp. 161–211.
55.
WeberM. (1946) Bureaucracy. In: GerthH.MillsC. (eds) From Max Weber: Essays in sociology, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 196–244.
56.
WeisburdD.MastrofskiS. D.McNalleyA. M.GreenspanR.WillisJ. (2003) Compstat and organizational change: Findings from a national survey. Criminology & Public Policy2: 421–456.
57.
WexlerC. (2010) Is the economic downturn fundamentally changing how we police? Critical Issues in Policing, Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
58.
WilsonJ. Q. (1968) Varieties of police behavior: The management of law and order in eight communities, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59.
WilsonJ. Q.BolandB. (1978) The effect of the police on crime. Law and Society Review12: 367–390.
60.
Womack, C. L. (2007). Criminal investigations: The impact of patrol officers on solving crimes (Master’s thesis). University of North Texas, Denton.
61.
WoodhamsJ.ToyeK. (2007) An empirical test of the assumptions of case linkage and offender profiling with serial commercial robberies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law13: 59–85.
62.
WrightR. T.DeckerS. H. (1997) Armed robbers in action: Stickups and street culture, Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
63.
WycoffM.CosgroveC. (2001) Investigations in the community policing context, Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Foundation.
64.
ZammutoR.GriffithT.MajchrzakA.DoughertyD.FarajS. (2007) Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organization Science18: 749–762.
