The study aimed to examine sex offender characteristics associated with a decision to confess. Based on the analysis of 624 sex offenders, our findings showed that, depending on the type of sex offender, different characteristics are associated with their likelihood of confessing during the police interrogation. Moreover, distinguishing between those who fully confess and those who only confess partially yielded mixed findings. Finally, our results showed that confession was not static and that offender characteristics were associated with a decision to confess once admitted to the prison. The findings are discussed in light of the implications for interrogation strategies.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
BaldwinJ.McConvilleM. (1980). Confessions in Crown court trials (Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure Research Study No. 5). London, UK: HMSO.
3.
BeauregardE.Deslauriers-VarinN.St-YvesM. (2010). Interactions between factors related to the decision of sex offenders to confess during police interrogation: A classification-tree approach. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 243-367.
4.
BeauregardE.LeclercB. (2007). An application of the rational choice approach to the offending process of sex offenders: A closer look at the decision-making. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 19, 115-133.
5.
BeauregardE.MieczkowskiT. (2011). Outside the interrogation room: The context of confession in sexual crimes. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 34, 246-264.
6.
Deslauriers-VarinN.BeauregardE.WongJ. (2011). Changing their mind about confessing to police: The role of contextual factors in crime confession. Police Quarterly, 14, 5-24.
7.
Deslauriers-VarinN.LussierP.St-YvesM. (2011). Confessing their crime: Factors influencing the offender’s decision to confess to police. Justice Quarterly, 28, 113-145.
8.
FallerK. C.BirdsallW. C.HenryJ.VandervortF.SilverschanzP. (2001). What makes sex offenders confess? An exploratory study. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 10, 31-49.
9.
GudjonssonG. H. (1999). Feelings of guilt and reparation for criminal acts. In CoxM. (Ed.), Remorse and reparation (pp. 83-94). London, UK: Kingsley.
10.
GudjonssonG. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions: A handbook. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
11.
GudjonssonG. H.SigurdssonJ. F. (1999). The Gudjonsson Confession Questionnaire–Revised (GCQ-R): Factor structure and its relationship with personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 953-968.
12.
GudjonssonG. H.SigurdssonJ. F. (2000). Differences and similarities between violent offenders and sex offenders. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 363-372.
13.
HolmbergU.ChristiansonS. A. (2002). Murderers’ and sexual offenders’ experiences of police interviews and their inclination to admit or deny crimes. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 31-45.
14.
InbauF. E.ReidJ. E.BuckleyJ. P.JayneB. C. (2001). Criminal interrogation and confession (4th ed.). Gaithersburg, MA: Aspen.
15.
KnightR. A.PrentkyR. A. (1990). Classifying sexual offenders: The development and corroboration of taxonomic models. In MarshallW. L.LawsD. R.BarbareeH. E. (Eds.), Handbook of sexual assault: Issues, theories and treatment of the offender (pp. 23-54). New York, NY: Plenum.
16.
LeoR. A. (1996). Inside the interrogation room. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 266-303.
17.
LippertT.CrossT. P.JonesL.WalshW. (2010). Suspect confession of child sexual abuse to investigators. Child Maltreatment, 15, 161-170.
18.
LongJ. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
19.
MerrillW. F. (1995). The art of interrogating rapists. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 64(1), 1-7.
20.
MitchellB. (1983, September). Confessions and police interrogation of suspects. Criminal Law Review, 596-604.
21.
MostonS.StephensonG. M. (2009). A typology of denial strategies by suspects in criminal investigations. In BullR.ValentineT.WilliamsonT. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology of investigative interviewing (pp. 17-34). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
22.
MostonS.StephensonG. M.WilliamsonT. M. (1992). The effects of case characteristics on suspect behaviour during police questioning. British Journal of Criminology, 32, 23-40.
23.
NapierM. R. (2010). Behavior, truth, and deception: Applying profiling and analysis to the interview process. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
24.
PearseJ.GudjonssonG. H.ClareI. C .H.RutterS. (1998). Police interviewing and psychological vulnerabilities: Predicting the likelihood of a confession. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 8, 1-21.
25.
PhillipsC.BrownD. (1998). Entry into the criminal justice system: A survey of police arrests and their outcomes. London, UK: Home Office.
26.
SoftleyP. (1980). Police interrogation: An observational study in four police stations (Home Office Research Study, No. 61). London, UK: HMSO.
27.
St-YvesM. (2006). Confession by sex offenders. In WilliamsonT. (Ed.), Investigative interviewing: Rights, research, regulation (pp. 107-122). Cullompton, UK: Willan.
28.
St-YvesM.ProulxJ.McKibbenA. (1994). CQSA: Computerised Questionnaire for Sexual Aggressor. Unpublished manuscript.
29.
ZulawskiD. E.WicklanderD. E. (1993). Practical aspects of interview and interrogation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
30.
ZulawskiD. E.WicklanderD. E. (2001). Practical aspects of interview and interrogation (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
