The spatial analysis of crime and community problems can inform police operations by revealing where resources can be most effectively deployed. Advances in understanding the spatial concentrations of crime show that some locations are repeatedly victimized and that some nearby locations are at an elevated risk for a subsequent crime during a relatively short period of time. These are known as repeat and near-repeat phenomena. Police may be able to have a strong preventive impact on crime if these risk patterns can be identified and disrupted. This analysis reports on whether a specialized, proactive patrol unit deployed to high-crime areas was effective in disrupting repeat and near-repeat patterns of shootings. Results suggest the proactive unit did not disrupt concentrations of shootings in a meaningful way. To improve effectiveness, police practitioners and researchers should seek to understand the factors driving these patterns and then design specific interventions to address them.
AndersonD.CheneryS.PeaseK. (1995). Preventing repeat victimization: A report on progress in Huddersfield (Home Office Police Research Group Briefing Note 4/95). London, UK: Home Office.
2.
BernascoW. (2008). Them again?: Same-offender involvement in repeat and near repeat burglaries. European Journal of Criminology, 5, 411-431.
3.
BowersK. J.JohnsonS. D. (2004). Who commits near repeats? A test of the boost explanation. Western Criminology Review, 5, 12-24.
4.
BowersK. J.JohnsonS. D. (2005). Domestic burglary repeats and space-time clusters. European Journal of Criminology, 2, 67-92.
5.
BradyT. V. (1996). Measuring what matters Part One: Measures of crime, fear and disorder (National Institute of Justice: Research in Action Series). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
6.
BragaA. A. (2001). The effects of hot spots policing on crime. Annals of American Political and Social Science, 578, 104-125.
7.
BragaA. A. (2007). The effects of hot spots policing on crime. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 1, 1-36.
8.
BragaA. A.BondB. J. (2008). Policing crime and disorder hot spots: A randomized controlled trial. Criminology, 46, 577-607.
9.
BrantinghamP.BrantinghamP. (1999). Theoretical model of crime hot spot generation. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 8, 7-26.
10.
ChaineyS.RatcliffeJ. H. (2005). GIS and crime mapping. London, UK: John Wiley.
11.
CheneryS.HoltJ.PeaseK. (1997). Biting back II: Reducing repeat victimization in Huddersfield (Crime Detection and Prevention Series Paper 82). London, UK: Home Office.
12.
CohenJ.LudwigJ. (2003). Policing crime guns. In LudwigJ.CookP. J. (Ed.), Evaluating gun policy: Effects on crime and violence (pp. 217-239). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
13.
FarrellG.PeaseK. (1993). Once bitten, twice bitten: Repeat victimization and its implications for crime prevention (Crime Prevention Unit Series Paper No. 46). London, UK: Home Office.
14.
ForresterD.ChattertonM.PeaseK. (1988). The Kirkholt burglary prevention project, Rochdale (Crime Prevention Unit Paper 13). London, UK: Home Office.
15.
ForresterD.FrenzS.O’ConnellM.PeaseK. (1990). The Kirkholt burglary prevention project: Phase II (Crime Prevention Unit Paper 23). London, UK: Home Office.
16.
HopeT. (1994). Problem-oriented policing and drug market locations: Three case studies. Crime Prevention Studies, 2, 5-32.
17.
JohnsonS. D.BernascoW.BowersK.ElffersH.RatcliffeJ.RengertG.TownsleyM. (2007). Space-time patterns of risk: A cross national assessment of residential burglary victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23, 201-219.
18.
JohnsonS. D.BowersK. J. (2004). The burglary as clue to the future: The beginnings of prospective hot-spotting. European Journal of Criminology, 1, 237-255.
19.
KennedyD. M.PiehlA. M.BragaA. A. (1996). Youth violence in Boston: Gun markets, serious youth offenders, and a use reduction strategy. Law and Contemporary Problems, 59, 147-196.
20.
KnoxG. (1963). Detection of low intensity epidemicity: Application to cleft lip and palate. British Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine, 17, 121-127.
21.
KnoxG. (1964). Epidemiology of childhood leukaemia in Northumberland and Durham. British Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine, 18, 17-24.
22.
KoperC. S.Mayo-WilsonE. (2006). Police crackdowns on illegal gun carrying: A systematic review of their impact on crime. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 227-261.
23.
LawtonB. A.TaylorR. B.LuongoA. J. (2005). Police officers on drug corners in Philadelphia, drug crime, and violent crime: Intended, diffusion, and displacement impacts. Justice Quarterly, 22, 427-451.
24.
LumC.KoperC. S.TaylorC. W. (2011). The evidence-based policing matrix. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 3-26.
25.
MaguireE. R. (2010). Taking implementation seriously: A response to Mastrofski, Weisburd, and Braga. In FrostN. A.FreilichJ. D.ClearT. R. (Ed.), Contemporary issues in criminal justice policy (pp. 265-270). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
26.
McGarrellE. F.ChermakS.WeissA.WilsonJ. (2001). Reducing firearms violence through directed police patrol. Criminology and Public Policy, 1, 119-148.
27.
MorganF. (2001). Repeat burglary in a Perth suburb: Indicator of short-term or long-term risk? In FarrellG.PeaseK. (Ed.), Repeat victimization (pp. 83-118). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
28.
National Research Council. (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence (SkoganW.FrydlK., Eds.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, Committee to Review Research on Police Policy and Practices, Committee on Law and Justice, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education.
29.
PapachristosA. V. (2009). Murder by structure: Dominance relations and the social structure of gang homicides. American Journal of Sociology, 115, 74-128.
30.
PierceG.SpaarS.BriggsL. (1988). The character of police work: Strategic and tactical implications. Boston, MA: Center for Applied Social Research, Northeastern University.
31.
Police Executive Research Forum. (2008). Violent crime in America: What we know about hot spots enforcement. Washington, DC: Author.
32.
RatcliffeJ. H. (2008). Near repeat calculator (Version 1.1). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
33.
RatcliffeJ. H.RengertG. F. (2008). Near-repeat patterns in Philadelphia shootings. Security Journal, 21, 58-76.
34.
RoncekD. W. (2000). Schools and crime. In GoldsmithV.McGuireP.MollenkopfJ.RossT. (Ed.), Analyzing crime patterns: Frontiers of practice (pp. 153-165). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
35.
RosenbaumD. P. (2006). The limits of hot spots policing. In WeisburdD.BragaA. A. (Ed.), Police innovation: Contrasting perspectives (pp. 245-263). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
SagovskyA.JohnsonS. (2007). When does repeat burglary victimization occur?Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 40, 1-26.
37.
ShermanL. W. (1992). Policing domestic violence: Experiments and dilemmas. New York, NY: Free Press.
38.
ShermanL. W.GartinP. R.BuergerM. E. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27, 27-55.
39.
ShermanL. W.RoganD. P. (1995). Effects of gun seizures on gun violence: “Hot spots” patrol in Kansas City. Justice Quarterly, 12, 673-693.
40.
ShermanL. W.WeisburdD. (1995). General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: A randomized controlled trial. Justice Quarterly, 12, 625-648.
TaylorB.KoperC. S.WoodsD. J. (2010). A randomized controlled trial of different policing strategies at hot spots of violent crime. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 149-181.
43.
TownsleyM.HomelR.ChaselingJ. (2000). Repeat burglary victimization: Spatial and temporal patterns. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 33, 37-63.
44.
TownsleyM.HomelR.ChaselingJ. (2003). Infectious burglaries: A test of the near repeat hypothesis. British Journal of Criminology, 43, 615-633.
45.
TrickettA.OsbornD. R.SeymourJ.PeaseK. (1992). What is different about high crime areas?British Journal of Criminology, 32, 81-89.
46.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). Houston City, Texas—American Community Survey 3-year estimates: 2006-2008. Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov/
VillavecesA.CummingsP.EspitiaV. E.KoepsellT. D.McKnightB.KellermanA. L. (2000). Effects of a ban on carrying firearms on homicide rates in 2 Colombian cities. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 1205-1209.
49.
WeickK. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
50.
WeisburdD.EckJ. E. (2004). What can police do to reduce crime, disorder, and fear?Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 42-65.
51.
WeisburdD.GreenL. (1994). Defining the drug market: The case of the Jersey City DMA system. In MacKenzieD.UchidaC. (Ed.), Drugs and crime: Evaluating public policy initiatives (pp. 61-76). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
52.
WeisburdD.GreenL. (1995). Policing drug hot-spots: The Jersey City drug market analysis experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12, 711-735.
53.
WeisburdD.LumC. (2005). The diffusion of computerized crime mapping in policing: Linking research and practice. Police Practice and Research, 6, 419-434.
54.
WeisburdD.MaherL.ShermanL. (1992). Contrasting crime general and crime specific theory: The case of hot-spots of crime. Advances in Criminological Theory, 4, 45-70.
55.
WeisburdD.MorrisN. A.ReadyJ. (2008). Risk-focused policing at places: An experimental evaluation. Justice Quarterly, 25, 163-200.
56.
WellsW.WuL.YeXinyue. (2011). Patterns of near-repeat gun assaults in Houston. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency. Prepublished online, May 12, 2011; doi: 10.1177/0022427810397946
