The “near repeat” phenomenon suggests that when a crime occurs in a given area, the surrounding area may exhibit an increased risk for subsequent crime in the days following the original incident. The present study assesses the extent to which near repeats generalize across three different crimes, including shootings, robbery, and auto theft. A series of near repeat models was estimated to further specify the temporal proximity of near repeats for each crime type under investigation. Results showed that a near repeat pattern exists across crime types; however, each crime type has a unique spatiotemporal pattern. Implications for police strategies, such as geographical profiling and future research connecting near repeat patterns to repeat offenders, are discussed.
AnselinL.GriffithsE.TitaG. (2008). Crime mapping and hot spot analysis. In WortleyR.MazerolleL. (Eds.), Environmental criminology and crime analysis (pp. 97-116). Portland, OR: Willan.
2.
BarkerM.GeraghtyJ.WebbB.KeyT. (1993). The prevention of street robbery (Crime Prevention Series Paper No. 44). London, UK: Home Office.
3.
BernascoW. (2008). Them again? Same-offender involvement in repeat and near repeat burglaries. European Journal of Criminology, 5, 411-431.
4.
BobaR. (2009). Crime analysis with crime mapping (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5.
BowersK. J.JohnsonS. D. (2004). Who commits near repeats? A test of the boost explanation. Western Criminology Review, 5, 12-24.
6.
BowersK. J.JohnsonS. D. (2005). Domestic burglary repeats and space-time clusters. European Journal of Criminology, 2, 67-92.
7.
CanterD.LarkinP. (1993). The environmental range of serial rapists. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 63-69.
8.
ChaineyS.RatcliffeJ. H. (2005). GIS and crime mapping. London, UK: Wiley.
9.
DeveryC. (1993). Patterns of motor vehicle theft. Sydney, Australia: New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
10.
EckJ. E.ChaineyS.CameronJ. G.LeitnerM.WilsonR. E. (2005). Mapping crime: Understanding hot spots. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice/National Criminal Justice Reference Service.
11.
EllingworthD.FarrellG.PeaseK. (1995). A victim is a victim is a victim? Chronic victimization in four sweeps of the British Crime Survey. British Journal of Criminology, 35, 360-365.
12.
FarrellG. (1992). Multiple victimization: Its extent and significance. International Journal of Victimology, 2, 85-102.
13.
FarrellG. (1995). Preventing repeat victimization. Crime and Justice, 14, 469-434.
14.
FarrellG.PeaseK. (1993). Once bitten, twice bitten: Repeat victimization and its implications for crime prevention (Crime Prevention Unit Series Paper No. 46). London, UK: Home Office.
15.
FarrellG.PhillipsC.PeaseK. (1995). Like taking candy: Why does repeat victimization occur?British Journal of Criminology, 35, 384-399.
16.
FarrellG.SousaW. (2001). Repeat victimization and hot spots: The overlap and its implications for crime control and problem-oriented policing. In FarrellG.PeaseK. (Eds.), Repeat victimization: Crime prevention studies (Vol. 12, pp. 221-240). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
17.
FeinbergS. E. (1980). Statistical modeling in the analysis of repeat victimization. In FeinbergS.ReissA., & Social Science Research Council (Eds.), Indicators of crime and criminal justice: Quantitative studies (pp. 54-58). Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics.
18.
ForresterD.ChattertonM.PeaseK. (1988). The Kirkholt burglary prevention project (Crime Prevention Unit Series Paper No. 13). London, UK: Home Office.
19.
GottfredsonM. R. (1984). Victims of crime: The dimensions of risk (Home Office Research Study 81). London, UK: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.
20.
GrubesicT. H.MackE. A. (2008). Spatio-temporal interaction of urban crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 24, 285-306.
21.
HindelangM. J.GottfredsonM. R.GarafaloJ. (1978). Victims of person crime. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
22.
JacobsB. A. (2010). Serendipity in robbery target selection. British Journal of Criminology, 50, 514-529.
23.
JohnsonS. D. (2008). Repeat burglary victimisation: A tale of two theories. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 4, 215-240.
24.
JohnsonS. D.BernascoW.BowersK. J.ElffersH.RatcliffeJ. H.RengertG. F.TownsleyM. T. (2007). Near repeats: A cross-national assessment of residential burglary. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23, 201-219.
25.
JohnsonS. D.BowersK. J. (2004). The burglary as clue to the future: The beginnings of prospective hot-spotting. European Journal of Criminology, 1, 237-255.
26.
JohnsonS. D.BowersK. J.HirschfieldA. F. (1997). New insights into the spatial and temporal distribution of repeat victimization. British Journal of Criminology, 37, 224-241.
27.
JohnsonS. D.SummersL.PeaseK. (2006). Vehicle crime: Communicating spatial and temporal patterns. London, UK: University College London, Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science.
28.
JohnsonS. D.SummersL.PeaseK. (2009). Offender as forager? A direct test of the boost account of victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 181-200.
29.
KnoxE. G. (1964). Epidemiology of childhood Leukemia in Northumberland and Durham. British Journal of Preventive and Social Medicine, 18, 17-24.
30.
LauritsenJ. L.QuinetK. F. (1995). Repeat victimization among adolescents and young adults. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 11, 143-166.
31.
MenardS. (2000). The “normality” of repeat victimization from adolescence through early adulthood. Justice Quarterly, 17, 543-574.
32.
MooneyC. Z. (1997). Monte Carlo simulation (Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 07-116). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
MorganF. (2001). Repeat burglary in a Perth suburb: Indictor of short-term or long-term risk? In FarrellG.PeaseK. (Eds.), Repeat victimization: Crime prevention studies (Vol. 12, pp. 83-118). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
34.
NaginD. S.PaternosterR. (2000). Population heterogeneity and state dependence: Specification and estimation of a nonparametric mixed Poisson model. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16, 117-144.
35.
OsbornD. R.EllingworthD.HopeT.TrickettA. (1996). Are repeatedly victimized households different?Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 12, 223-245.
36.
PolviN. H.LoomanT. R.HumphariesC.PeaseK. (1990). Repeat break-and-enter victimization: Time course and crime prevention strategies. Journal of Police Science Administration, 17, 8-11.
37.
RatcliffeJ. H. (2007a). Near repeat calculator (Version 1.1). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University/Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
38.
RatcliffeJ. H. (2007b). Near repeat calculator program manual for Version 1.1. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University/Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
39.
RatcliffeJ. H.RengertG. F. (2008). Near-repeat patterns in Philadelphia shootings. Security Journal, 21, 58-76.
40.
ReissA. J. (1980). Victim proneness in repeat victimization by type of crime. In FeinbergS. E.ReissA. J. (Eds.), Indicators of crime and criminal justice: Quantitative studies (pp. 41-53). Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Statistics.
41.
RossmoD. K. (2000). Geographic profiling. Washington, DC: CRC Press.
42.
SchwartzD.DodgeK. A.CoieJ. D. (1993). The emergence of chronic peer victimization in boys play groups. Child Development, 64, 1755-1772.
43.
ShermanL. W.GartinP. R.BuergerM. E. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27, 27-55.
44.
ShermanL. W.WeisburdD. (1995). General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: A randomized, controlled trial. Justice Quarterly, 12, 625-648.
45.
SparksR. F.GennH. G.DoddD. J. (1977). Surveying victims: A study of the measurement of criminal victimization, perceptions of crime, and attitudes to criminal justice. London, UK: Wiley.
46.
TonkinM.GrantT.BondJ. W. (2008). To link or not to link: A test of the case linkage principles using serial car theft data. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 5, 59-77.
47.
TownsleyM.HomelR.ChaselingJ. (2000). Repeat burglary victimization: Spatial and temporal patterns. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 33, 37-63.
48.
TownsleyM.HomelR.ChaselingJ. (2003). Infectious burglaries: A test of the near repeat hypothesis. British Journal of Criminology, 43, 615-633.
49.
TownsleyM.JohnsonS. D.RatcliffeJ. H. (2008). Space time dynamics of insurgent activity in Iraq. Security Journal, 21, 139-146.
50.
TrumanJ. L.RandM. R. (2010). Criminal victimization, 2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
WeiselD. L. (2005). Analyzing repeat victimization. Problem-oriented guides for police problem-solving tools series No. 4. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice/Community Oriented Policing Services.
53.
WilesP.CostelloA. (2000). The “road to nowhere”: The evidence for travelling criminals (Home Office Research Study 207). London, UK: Home Office.
54.
ZandbergenP. A.HartT. C. (2009). Geocoding accuracy considerations in determining residency restrictions for sex offenders. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20, 62-90.
