This study aimed to investigate the offender’s decision making in crime confession during police interrogation. On the basis of a sample of 211 incarcerated offenders, the study showed that 21% of offenders changed their mind about confessing or not their crime following police interrogation. Logit regression indicated that contextual factors were associated with the offender’s final decision to confess after controlling for the offender’s initial decision. Multinomial regression further showed that offenders with a lengthy criminal record, advised by a lawyer, and facing drug-related charges characterized by weak police evidence were less likely to confess to the police, even when they initially planned to do so. Findings are discussed in light of the literature on crime confession.
Baldwin, J. ( 1993). Police interview techniques-Establishing truth or proof ? British Journal of Criminology, 33, 325-351.
2.
Beauregard, E., Deslauriers-Varin, N., & St-Yves, M. (2010). An investigation of the interactions between factors related to the decision of sex offenders to confess or not during police interrogation: A classification tree approach. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 343-367.
3.
Bouchard, M., & Nguyen, H. ( 2010). Is it who you know or how many that counts?Justice Quarterly, 27, 130-158.
4.
Crowne, D.P., & Marlowe, D. ( 1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology . Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354.
5.
Deslauriers-Varin, N., Lussier, P., & St-Yves, M. (2011). Confessing their crime: Factors influencing the offender’s decision to confess to the police . Justice Quarterly, 28, 113-145.
6.
Gudjonsson, G.H. ( 2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions. A handbook . Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
7.
Gudjonsson, G.H., & Petursson, H. ( 1991). Custodial interrogation: Why do suspects confess and how does it relate to their crime, attitude and personality?Personality & Individual Differences, 12, 295-306.
8.
Gudjonsson, G.H., & Sigurdsson, J.F. (1999). The Gudjonsson Confession Questionnaire-Revised (GCQ-R): Factor structure and its relationship with personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 953-968.
9.
Gudjonsson, G.H., Sigurdsson, J.F., & Einarsson, E. ( 2004). The role of personality in relation to confessions and denials. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10, 125-135.
10.
Hayes, H.F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77-89.
11.
Hilgendorf, E.L., & Irving, B. ( 1981). A decision-making model of confessions. In M. A. Lloyd-Bostock (Ed.), Psychology in legal contexts: Applications and limitations (pp. 67-84). London, UK: MacMillan.
12.
Holmberg, M.D., & Christianson, S.-A. (2002). Murderers’ and sexual offenders’ experiences of police interviews and their inclination to admit or deny crimes. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 31-45.
13.
Imbau, F.E., Reid, J.E., Buckley, J.P., & Jayne, B.C. ( 2001). Criminal interrogation and confession (4th ed.). Sudbury, Ontario, Canada: Jones and Bartlett, Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
14.
Kassin, S.M., & Gudjonsson, G.H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature & issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 33-67.
15.
Leo, R.A. ( 1996). Inside the interrogation room. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 86, 266-303.
16.
McConville, M. ( 1993). Corroboration and confessions. The impact of a rule requiring that no conviction can be sustained on the basis of confession evidence alone . London, UK: The Royal Commission on Criminal Justice Research Study No. 36. HMSO.
17.
Mojena, R. ( 1977). Hierarchical grouping methods and stopping rules: An evaluation. Computing Journal, 20, 359-363.
18.
Moston, S., Stephenson, G.M., & Williamson, T.M. (1992). The effects of case characteristics on suspect behavior during police questioning. British Journal of Criminology, 32, 23-40.
19.
Pearse, J., Gudjonsson, G.H., Clare, I.C.H., & Rutter, S. ( 1998). Police interviewing and psychological vulnerabilities: Predicting the likelihood of a confession. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 8, 1-21.
20.
Phillips, C., & Brown, D. ( 1998). Entry into the criminal justice system: A survey of police arrests and their outcomes. London, UK: Home Office.
21.
Sigurdsson, J.F., & Gudjonsson, G.H. (1994). Alcohol and drug intoxication during police interrogation and the reasons why suspects confess to the police . Addiction, 89, 985-997.
22.
Soukara, S., Bull, R., Vrij, A., Turner, M., & Cherryman, J. ( 2009). What really happens in police interviews with suspects? Tactics and confessions. Psychology, Crime and Law, 15, 493-506.
23.
St-Yves, M. ( 2006). The psychology of rapport: five basic rules. In T. Williamson, Investigative Interviewing: Rights, Research, Regulation (pp. 87-106). Collumpton : Willan Publishing.
24.
St-Yves, M., & Deslauriers-Varin, N. (2009). The psychology of suspects’ decision making during interrogation. In R. Bull, T. Valentine, & T. Williamson (Eds.), Handbook of psychology of investigative interviewing: Current developments and future directions (pp. 1-15). Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
