Some concern has arisen over the overly “routine” use of conducted energy devices (CEDs) and their effectiveness in achieving important policy goals such as reducing the incidence of lethal force. These concerns directly call into question the departmental policy surrounding these devices. Using a large, national sample of chief executive officers of municipal law enforcement agencies (N = 210), the analyses reported here (a) describe the current state of CED policy, including placement on the use of force continuum; (b) assess departmental perceptions of the effectiveness of CEDs in reducing the incidence of lethal force; and (c) examine how variations in CED policy is related to a number of use of force outcomes. Findings suggest that 56% of departments surveyed reported that CEDs reduced the need to use lethal force. Moreover, regression analyses indicate that higher placement of CEDs on the use of force continuum is related to both fewer CED deployments and, although not significantly, also to reported reductions in the use of lethal force. Implications for policy and research are discussed.
Adams, K., & Jennison, V. ( 2007). What we do not know about police use of tasers. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 30, 447-465.
2.
Alpert, G.P., & Dunham, R.G. ( 2000). Analysis of police use of force data. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
3.
American Civil Liberties Union. (2005). Stun gun fallacy: How the lack of TASER regulation endangers lives. Retrieved July 15, 2010, from http://www.aclunc.org/issues/criminal_justice/police_practices/asset_upload_file389_5242.pdf
4.
Amnesty International. (2004). USA: Excessive and lethal force? Amnesty International’s concerns about death and ill-treatment involving police use of tasers (AMR 51/139/2004). Retrieved July 15, 2010, from http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/AMR51/139/2004/en/4682af8d-d581-11dd-bb24-1fb85fe8fa05/amr511392004en.pdf
5.
Bradford, D., & Pynes, J.E. ( 1999). Police academy training: Why hasn’t it kept up with practice? Police Quarterly, 2, 283-301.
6.
Brand, R.F., & Peak, K. ( 1995). Assessing police training curricula: ‘Consumer reports’. The Justice Professional, 9, 45-58.
7.
Bunker, R.J. ( 2009). Should police departments develop specific training and policies governing use of multiple TASER shocks against individuals who might be in vulnerable physiological states?Criminology & Public Policy, 8, 893-901.
8.
The Canadian Press. (2007). Tasers don’t reduce lethal shootings, despite police and politicians’ claims. Retrieved July 15, 2010, from http://www.cbc.ca/canada/manitoba/story/2007/12/17/cp-tasers.html
9.
Carr, L. ( 2005). Use of TASERs decreases injuries. Cincinnati, OH: Cincinnati Police Department Report to the Community.
10.
Chermak, S. ( 2009). Conducted energy devices and criminal justice policy . Criminology & Public Policy, 8, 861-864.
11.
Donnelly, T. ( 2001). Less lethal technologies: Initial prioritisation and evaluation. London: Great Britain Home Office.
12.
Dror, I.E. ( 2007). Perception of risk and decision to use force. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 1, 265-272.
13.
Force, R. ( 2004). Police-involved shootings lowest in 14 years. Phoenix, AZ: Phoenix Police Department Media Relations Detail.
14.
Garner, F.H., Schade, T., Hepburn, J., & Buchanan, J. ( 1995). Measuring the continuum of force used by and against police. Criminal Justice Review, 20, 146-168.
15.
Gellar, W.A., & Scott, M.S. ( 1992). Deadly force. What we know: A practitioner’s desk reference on police-involved shootings. Washington, DC : Police Executive Research Forum.
16.
Government Accountability Office. (2005). TASER weapons: Use of TASERs by selected law enforcement agencies (GAO-05-064) . Retrieved July15, 2010, http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d05464.pdf
17.
Herz, D.C. ( 2001). Improving police encounters with juveniles: Does training make a difference? Justice Research and Policy, 3, 57-78.
18.
Hopkins, P., & Beary, K. ( 2003). TASER use and officer/suspect injuries. Orlando, Florida: Orange County Sheriff’s Office .
19.
Hougland, S., Mesloh, C., & Henych, M. ( 2005). Use of force, civil litigation, and the taser. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 74, 24-30.
20.
Jenkinson, E., Neeson, C., & Bleetman, A. ( 2006). The relative risk of police use-of-force options: Evaluating the potential for deployment of electronic weaponry. Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine, 13, 229-241.
21.
Joint Non-Lethal Weapons Human Effects Center of Excellence. (2005). Human effectiveness and risk characterization of the electromuscular incapacitation device: A limited analysis of the TASER. Part 1: Technical Report. Part 2: Appendices. Brooks Air Force Base, TX: Air Force Research Laboratory.
22.
Jett, M.B. ( 1997). Pepper spray: Training for safety. FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 66, 27-23.
23.
Kaminski, R.J. ( 2009). Research on conducted energy devices: Findings, methods, and a possible alternative. Criminology & Public Policy , 8, 903-913.
24.
Kaminski, R.J., & Martin, J.A. ( 2000). An analysis of police officer satisfaction with defense and control tactics. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 23, 132-153.
25.
Kedir, S.H. ( 2006). Stunning trends in shocking crimes: A comprehensive analysis of Taser weapons. Journal of Law and Health, 20, 357-384.
26.
Khanna, R. ( 2007, January 14). Questions grow over HPD’s use of Taser guns. Houston Chronicle. Retrieved July15, 2010, http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/4464516.html
27.
Kleinig, J. ( 2007). Ethical constraints on taser use by police. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 1, 284-292.
28.
Knetzger, M.R., & Knetzger, L.A. (2006). Green bay police department taser report. Green Bay, WI: Green Bay Police Department. Retrieved July15, 2010, http://www.gbpolice.org/Taser%20Study.pdf
29.
Laur, D. ( 2000). Ottawa, taser technology research paper. Retrieved July 15, 2010, from http://www.css.drdc-rddc.gc.ca/cprc/tr/tr-2000-01.pdf
30.
Lee, B.K., Vittinghoff, D., Whiteman, D., Park, M., Lau, L.L., & Tseng, Z.H. ( 2009). Relation of TASER (electrical stun gun) deployment to increase in in-custody sudden deaths. American Journal of Cardiology, 103, 877-880.
31.
Long, J.S., & J. Freese. (2006). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using stata (2nd ed.). College Station, TX: StataCorp LC.
32.
Marion, N. ( 1998). Police academy training: Are we teaching recruits what they need to know? Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 21, 54-79.
33.
McEwen, T. ( 1997). Policies on less-than-lethal force in law enforcement agencies. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 20, 39-59.
34.
Mesloh, C., Henych, M., Thompson, L.F., & Wolf, R. ( 2008). A qualitative and quantitative analysis of conducted energy devices: TASER X26 vs. Stinger S200. A report to theNational Institute of Justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
35.
Mesloh, C., Henych, M., & Wolf, R. ( 2008). Less lethal weapon effectiveness, use of force, and suspect and officer injuries: A five-year analysis. A Report to theNational Institute of Justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
36.
Meyer, G. ( 1991). Non-lethal weapons vs. conventional police tactics: The Los Angeles Police Department experience. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , California State University, Los Angeles.
37.
Meyer, G. ( 1992). Nonlethal weapons vs. conventional police tactics: Assessing injuries and liabilities. Police Chief, 59, 10-18.
38.
Morrison, G.B., & Vila, B.J. ( 1998). Police handgun qualification: Practical measure or aimless activity?Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 21, 510-533.
39.
Morrison, G.B. ( 2003). Police and correctional department firearm training frameworks in Washington State. Police Quarterly, 6, 192-221.
40.
Morrison, G.B. ( 2009). Conducted energy weapons: Learning from operational discretion and encounter outcomes. Criminology & Public Policy, 8, 915-925.
41.
Murphy, P. ( 2006). Taser use by the Boise Police Department: Ombudsman special report. Boise, ID: Boise Police Department.
42.
Osgood, D.W., & Chambers, J.M. (2000). Social disorganization outside the metropolis: An analysis of rural youth violence. Criminology, 38, 81-116.
43.
Seattle Police Department. (2004). Seattle police department taser use and deployment fact sheet. Retrieved August 23, 2006, from http://www.Taser.com/documents/seattlepduse.pdf
44.
Smith, M.R., Kaminski, R.J., Rojek, J., Alpert, G.P., & Mathis, J. ( 2007). The impact of conducted energy devices and other types of force and resistance on officer and suspect injuries. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 30, 426-446.
45.
Smith, M.R., & Petrocelli, M. (2002). The effectiveness of force used by police in making arrests. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, 3, 201-215.
46.
Smith, M.R., Petrocelli, M., & Scheer, C. ( 2007). Exessive force, civil liability and the Taser in the nation’s courts: Implications for law enforcement policy and practice . Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 30, 398-422.
47.
Sprague, O. ( 2007). The deployment of Taser weapons to UK law enforcement officials: An Amnesty International perspective. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 1, 309-315.
48.
Stanbrook, M.B. ( 2008). Tasers in medicine: An irrelevant call for proposals . Canadian Medical Association Journal. Retrieved July 15, 2010, from http://ecmaj.ca/cgi/reprint/178/11/1401
49.
Staton, J.R. ( 2008). A taser policy that works. Law & Order, 56, 93-97.
50.
TASER International. (2002). Advanced taser M26 field report analysis. Scottsdale, AZ : TASER International.
51.
TASER International. (2009). Electronic control devices (ECDs): Field data and risk management. Scottsdale, AZ: TASER International. Retrieved July 15, 2010, from http://www.taser.com/research/statistics/Documents/Injury%20Reduction%20Stats%20PUBLIC%2005%2014%2009%20[Compatibility%20Mode].pdf
52.
Terrill, W., & Mastrofski, S.D. (2002). Situational and officer-based determinants of police coercion. Justice Quarterly, 19, 215-248.
53.
Terrill, W., & Paoline, E.A. ( 2007). Force continuums: Moving beyond speculation and toward empiricism. Law Enforcement Executive Forum, 7, 27-31
54.
Vilke, G.M., & Chan, T.C. ( 2007). Less lethal technology: Medical issues. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 30, 341-357.
55.
Walker, S. ( 1993). Taming the system: The control of discretion in criminal justice, 1950-1990. New York: Oxford University Press.
56.
White, M.D., & Ready, J. ( 2007). The TASER as a less lethal force: Findings on use and effectiveness on a large metropolitan area. Police Quarterly , 10, 170-191.
57.
Williams, G.T. ( 2002). Force continuums: A liability to law enforcement? FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 71, 14-19.
58.
Wolf, R., Pressler, T., & Winton, M. ( 2009). Campus law enforcement use-of-force and conducted energy devices: A national-level exploratory study of perceptions and practices. Criminal Justice Review, 34, 29-43.
