This study examined structural correlates of police effectiveness in 28 market democracies. It found that perceptions of police effectiveness rose in countries with low homicide rates, independent judiciaries, and high income. Greater political freedoms and a lower robbery rate were associated with low police effectiveness. The size of police forces and population and unemployment rates were largely irrelevant. Findings demonstrated the basic dependence of quality policing on good judicial governance and a healthy economy. Making the police more effective requires reform of more than the police. In postmodern democracies, effective policing will require improved media portrayal of crime and increased democratization of police tactics and strategies.
Amir, M., & Einstein, S., (Eds.). (2001). Policing, security, and democracy: Theory and practice. Huntsville, TX: The Office of International Criminal Justice.
2.
Andersen, M. E. (2002). La policia: Pasado, presente, y propuesta para el futuro [Police: Past, present, and proposals for the future]. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Sudamericana.
3.
Archer, D., & Gartner, R. (1984). Violence and crime in cross-national perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
4.
Aydin, A. H. (1997). Police organization and legitimacy: Case studies of England, Wales, and Turkey. Brookfield, VT: Avebury.
5.
Bayley, D. H. (1985). Patterns of policing: A comparative international analysis. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
6.
Bayley, D. H. (1994). Police for the future. New York: Oxford University Press.
7.
Bayley, D. H. (Ed.). (1997). What works in policing. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
Bayley, D. H. (2001). Democratizing the police abroad: What to do and how to do it. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
9.
Bennett, R. R. (1982). Effect of police personnel levels on crime clearance rates: A crossnational analysis. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 6, 177-193.
10.
Bennett, R. R.& Bennett, S. B. (1983). Police personnel levels and the incidence of crime: A cross-national investigation. Criminal Justice Review, 8, 32-39.
11.
Boni, N. (1995). Perceptions of police and policing: A review of public and police surveys. Payneham, Australia: National Police Research Unit.
12.
Braga, A. A. (2001). The effects of hot spot policing on crime. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 104-125.
13.
Cao, L., & Stack, S. (2000). Confidence in the police among industrialized nations. In D. Rounds (Ed.), International criminal justice: Issues in a global perspective(pp. 71-81). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
14.
The Economist Intelligence Unit. (2002). EIU Country data. Retrieved from http://wwwa1.secure.alacra.com/cgi-bin/eiu.exe?app=eiu&msg=DisplayContent&topic=datatype&product=17
15.
Ellison, G. (2000). ‘Reflecting all shades of opinion’: Public attitudinal surveys and the construction of police legitimacy in Northern Ireland. British Journal of Criminology, 40, 88-111.
16.
Ethier, D. (1999). Does economic adjustment affect the legitimacy of democracies? Comparing sevenWest-European cases. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 40, 425-453.
17.
Forst, B. (2000). The privatization and civilianization of policing. In C. M. Friel (Ed.), Boundary changes in criminal justice organizations: Criminal justice 2000, Vol. 2(pp. 19-79). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
18.
Heymann, P. B. (1997). Principles of democratic policing. In National Institute of Justice & Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (Eds.), Policing in emerging democracies: Workshop papers and highlights(pp. 9-24). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
19.
Hickman, R. (2002). Demography and criminal justice. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
20.
Howard, G. J., Newman, G., & Pridemore, W. A. (2000). Theory, method, and data in comparative criminology. In D. Duffee (Ed.), Measurement and analysis of crime and justice: Criminal justice 2000, Vol. 4(pp.139-211). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
21.
International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL). (2001). International crime statistics 1999. Lyon, France: Author.
22.
International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL). (2002). International crime statistics 2000. Lyon, France: Author.
23.
International Monetary Fund. (2002). The world economic outlook database April 2002. Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2002/01/data/index.htm
24.
Jacobs, D., & Helms, R. E. (1997). Testing coercive explanations for order: The determinants of law enforcement strength over time. Social Forces, 75, 1361-1392.
25.
Johnston, L. (1998). Late modernity, governance, and policing. In J.-P. Brodeur (Ed.), How to recognize good policing? Problems and issues(pp. 193-214). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Jones, T., Newburn, T., & Smith, D. J. (1994). Democracy and policing. London: PSI.
27.
Karatnycky, A. (2000). Freedom in the world: The annual survey of political rights and civil liberties, 1999-2000.Somerset, NJ: Transaction.
28.
Kusow, A. M., Wilson, L. C., & Martin, D. E. (1997). Determinants of citizen satisfaction with the police: The effects of residential location. Policing, 20, 655-664.
29.
LaFree, G. (1999). Summary and review of cross-national comparative studies of homicide. In M. D. Smith& M. A. Zahn (Eds.), Homicide: A sourcebook of social research(pp. 125-145). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
Lipset, S. M. (1994). The social requisites of democracy revisited. American Sociological Review, 59, 1-22.
31.
Lorentzen, H. (1980). Some features of police organization in the Nordic countries, 1970-1980. In N. Bishop, From crime and crime control in Scandinavia: 1976-80(pp. 41-47). Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian Research Council for Criminology.
32.
Lynch, J. P., Sabol, W. J., Planty, M.,& Shelley, M. (2002). Crime, coercion, and community: The effects of arrest and incarceration policies on informal social control in neighborhoods. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
33.
Manning, P. K. (2001). Theorizing policing: The drama and myth of crime control in the NYPD. Theoretical Criminology, 5, 315-344.
34.
Marx, G. T. (2001). Police and democracy. In M. Amir & S. Einstein (Eds.), Policing, security and democracy: Theory and practice(pp. 35-45). Huntsville, TX: Office of International Criminal Justice.
35.
Mawby, R. C. (2002). Policing images: Policing, communication and legitimacy. Portland, OR: Willan.
36.
Mawby, R. I. (1996). Comparative research of police practices in England, Germany, Poland, and Hungary. InM. Pagon (Ed.), Policing in Central and Eastern Europe: Comparing firsthand knowledge with experience from the West(pp. 473-485). Ljubljana, Slovenia: College of Police and Security Studies.
37.
Monet, J-C. (1995). Comparing police systems: Final comments. In J.-P. Brodeur (Ed.), Comparisons in policing: An international perspective(pp.213-227). Brookfield, VT: Avebury.
38.
Morgan, R.,& Newburn, T. (1997). The future of policing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39.
Neapolitan, J. L. (1997). Cross-national crime: A research review and sourcebook. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
40.
Paoline, E. A., Myers, S. M., & Worden, R. E. (2000). Police culture, individualism, and community policing: Evidence from two police departments. Justice Quarterly, 17, 575-605.
41.
Potts, L. W. (1982). Limits of police-community relations programs: A cross-national perspective. Police Studies, 5, 10-20.
42.
Reiner, R. (1998). Process or product? Problems of assessing individual police performance. In P. Brodeur (Ed.), How to recognize good policing: Problems and issues(pp. 55-72). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
Shane, P. G. (1980). Police and people: A comparison of five countries. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
44.
Sherman, L. W. (1974). The sociology and the social reform of the American police: 1950-1973. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 3, 255-263.
45.
Sherman, L. W. (1990). Police crackdowns: Initial and residual deterrence. In M. Tonry & N. Morris (Eds.), Crime and justice: A Review of research, Vol. 12(pp. 1-48). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46.
Sherman, L. W. (1997). Policing for crime prevention. In National Institute of Justice (Ed.), Preventing crime: What works, what doesn't, what's promising. A report to the United States Congress(pp. 8:1-8:58). Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs.
47.
Sherman, L. W. (2001). Consent of the governed: Police, democracy, and diversity. InM. Amir & S. Einstein (Eds.), Policing, security, and democracy: Theory and practice(pp. 17-33). Huntsville, TX: Office of International Criminal Justice, Inc.
48.
Skogan, W. G. (1984). Reporting crimes to the police: The status of world research. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
49.
Skolnick, J. H. (1972). Changing conceptions of the police. In R. M. Hutchins (Ed.), The great ideas today 1972(pp. 40-57). Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica.
50.
Smith, D. A. (1986). The neighborhood context of police behavior. In A. J. Reiss Jr.,& M. Tonry (Eds.), Crime and justice: A review of research, Vol. 8 (pp. 313-341). Chicago: University of Chicago.
51.
Smith, D. A.,& Visher, C. A. (1981). Street-level justice: Situational determinants of police arrest decisions. Social Problems, 29, 167-177.
52.
Sung, H. (2002). The fragmentation of policing in American cities: Toward an ecological theory of police-citizen relations. Westport, CT: Praeger.
53.
United Nations Center for International Crime Prevention. (2002). The seventh United Nations survey on crime trends and the operations of criminal justice systems (1998-2000). Retrieved from http://www.odccp.org/crime_cicp_survey_seventh.html
54.
van Dijk, J. (2001). Attitudes of victims and repeat victims toward the police: Results of the international crime victim survey. In G. Farrell & K. Pease (Eds.), Repeat victimization(pp. 27-52). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
55.
van Dijk, J., & Kangaspunta, K. (2000, January). Piecing together the cross-national crime puzzle. National Institute of Justice Journal, 34-41.
56.
Walker, S. (1977). A critical history of police reform. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
57.
World Economic Forum. (1999). Global competitiveness report 1999. New York: Oxford University Press.
58.
World Economic Forum. (2000). Global competitiveness report 2000. New York: Oxford University Press.
59.
Zvekic, U. (2001). Citizens and police relations in countries in transition. In M. Amir & S. Einstein (Eds.), Policing, security and democracy: Theory and practice(pp. 219-238). Huntsville, TX: Office of International Criminal Justice.
