Performance feedback is an evidence-based implementation support strategy; however, the conditions under which it most effectively operates are unknown. This U.S. study compared telemediated performance feedback provided at two temporal locations (i.e., directly before and following observation sessions) to first-year teachers of middle school students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Within an adapted alternating treatments design, feedback was provided on teachers’ use of behavior-specific precorrections and praise during virtual instruction. For three of the four teacher participants, performance feedback provided at both temporal locations increased their frequency of precorrections and praise. For two participants, performance feedback provided directly prior to the next observation was more effective than feedback provided directly following the observation. Results of a usability survey suggest that participants found feedback provided at both temporal locations to be effective but preferred receiving post-observation feedback. Future directions in research and implications for designing classroom coaching and consultation systems are discussed.
Aljadeff-AbergelE.PetersonS. M.WiskirchenR. R.HagenK. K.ColeM. L. (2017). Evaluating the temporal location of feedback: Providing feedback following performance vs. prior to performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 37(2), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2017.1309332
2.
AlveroA. M.BucklinB. R.AustinJ. (2001). An objective review of the effectiveness and essential characteristics of performance feedback in organizational settings (1985–1998). Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 21(1), 3–29. https://10.1300/J075v21n01_02
3.
AuldR. G.BelfioreP. J.ScheelerM. (2010). Increasing pre-service teachers’ use of differential reinforcement: Effects of performance feedback on consequences for student behavior. Journal of Behavioral Education, 19, 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-010-9107-4
4.
BoeE. E. (2014). Teacher demand, supply, and shortage in special education: A national perspective. In SindelarP. T.McCrayE. D.BrownellM. T.Lingugaris-KraftB. (Eds.), Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation (pp. 67–94). Routledge.
5.
ChafouleasS. M.BrieschA. M.NeugebauerS. R.Riley-TillmanT. C. (2011). Usage rating profile—Intervention (revised). University of Connecticut.
CoddingR. S.FeinbergA. B.DunnE. K.PaceG. M. (2005). Effects of immediate performance feedback on implementation of behavior support plans. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38(2), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2005.98-04
8.
CondermanG.MorinJ.StephensJ. T. (2005). Special education student teaching practices. Preventing School Failure, 49(3), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.49.3.5-10
FallonL. M.Collier-MeekM. A.KurtzK. D.DeFouwE. R. (2018). Emailed implementation supports to promote treatment integrity: Comparing the effectiveness and acceptability of prompts and performance feedback. Journal of School Psychology, 68, 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.03.001
11.
FallonL. M.Collier-MeekM. A.MagginD. M.SanettiL. M. H.JohnsonA. H. (2015). Is performance feedback an evidence-based intervention? A systematic review and evaluation of single-case research. Exceptional Children, 81(2), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914551738
12.
FrazierT. V. (2022). Classroom management in the virtual classroom: Educators’ perceptions beyond the virtual classroom (Publication no. AAI29161034) [Doctoral dissertation, Saint Leo University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
13.
GageN. A.MacSuga-GageA. S. (2017). Salient classroom management skills: Finding the most effective skills to increase student engagement and decrease disruptions. Report on Emotional and Behavioral Disorders in Youth, 17(1), 13–18. PMID: 30686938; PMCID: PMC6345407.
14.
GilmourA. F.SandilosL. E.PilnyW. V.SchwartzS.WehbyJ. H. (2022). Teaching students with emotional/behavioral disorders: Teachers’ burnout profiles and classroom management. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 30(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266211020258
15.
GinnsD. S.BegenyJ. C. (2019). Effects of performance feedback on treatment integrity of a class-wide level system for secondary students with emotional disturbance. Behavioral Disorders, 44(3), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742918795884
16.
HawkinsS.HeflinL. J. (2011). Increasing secondary teachers’ behavior-specific praise using a video self-modeling and visual performance feedback intervention. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 13(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300709358110
17.
HirschS. E.BruhnA. L.McDanielS. M.MathewsH. (2022). A survey of educators serving students with emotional and behavioral disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic. Behavioral Disorders, 47(2), 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/01987429211016780
18.
HirschS. E.McDanielS. C.La SalleT.WalkerA. C. (2021). Instructional management for students with emotional and behavioral disorders in remote learning environments. Intervention in School and Clinic, 57(2), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512211001825
19.
HirschS. E.RandallK.BradshawC.LloydJ. W. (2021). Professional learning and development in classroom management for novice teachers: A systematic review. Education and Treatment of Children, 44, 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-021-00042-6
20.
KorpershoekH.HarmsT.de BoerH.Van KuijkM.DoolaardS. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of classroom management strategies and classroom management programs on students’ academic, behavioral, emotional, and motivational outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 643–680. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626799
LevinJ. R.KratochwillT. R. (2021). Randomized single-case intervention designs and analyses for health sciences researchers: A versatile clinical trials companion. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 55, 755–764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-021-00274-z
23.
MassarM. M.HornerR. H.KittelmanA.ConleyK. M. (2023). Mechanisms of effective coaching: Using prompting and performance feedback to improve teacher and student outcomes. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 25(3), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007221133524
24.
MortensonB. P.WittJ. C. (1998). The use of weekly performance feedback to increase teacher implementation of a prereferral intervention. School Psychology Review, 27, 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1998.12085942
25.
NoellG. H.GansleK. A. (2014). The use of performance feedback to improve intervention implementation in schools. In SanettiL. M. H.KratochwillT. R. (Eds.), Treatment integrity: A foundation for evidence-based practice in applied psychology (pp. 161–183). American Psychological Association.
26.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J.DavisJ. L.SauberS. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42(2), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
27.
PogodzinskiB.YoungsP.FrankK. A. (2013). Collegial climate and novice teachers’ intent to remain teaching. American Journal of Education, 120(1), 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1086/673123
28.
RathelJ. M.DrasgowE.ChristleC. C. (2008). Effects of supervisor performance feedback on increasing preservice teachers’ positive communication behaviors with students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16(2), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426607312537
29.
ReinkeW.Lewis-PalmerT.MerrellK. (2008). The Classroom Check-Up: A classwide teacher consultation model for increasing praise and decreasing disruptive behavior. School Psychology Review, 37(3), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2008.12087879
30.
RilaA.BruhnA. L.WangL. (2024). The disaggregated effects of visual performance feedback on teachers’ use of behavior-specific praise and reprimands. Journal of Behavioral Education, 33, 53–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-022-09479-0
31.
SanettiL. M. H.FallonL. M.Collier-MeekM. A. (2013). Performance feedback provided by school personnel to increase teachers’ intervention implementation: An evaluation of effectiveness, procedural integrity, and feasibility. Psychology in the Schools, 50(2), 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21664
32.
ScheelerM. C.RuhlK. L.McAfeeJ. K. (2004). Providing performance feedback to teachers: A review. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27(4), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840640402700407
33.
SimonsenB.FairbanksS.BrieschA.MyersD.SugaiG. (2008). Evidence-based practices in classroom management: Considerations for research to practice. Education & Treatment of Children, 31(3), 351–380. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.0.0007
34.
SimonsenB.MacSugaA. S.FallonL. M.SugaiG. (2013). The effects of self-monitoring on teachers’ use of specific praise. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 15(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300712440453
35.
SimonsenB.MacSuga-GageA. S.BriereD. S.FreemanJ.MyersD.ScottT. M.SugaiG. (2014). Multitiered support framework for teachers’ classroom management practices: Overview and case study of building the triangle for teachers. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 16(3), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300713484062
36.
SleimanA. A.SigurjonsdottirbS.ElnesA.GageN. A.GravinaN. A. (2020). A quantitative review of performance feedback in organizational settings. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 40(3–4), 303–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2020.1823300
37.
StateT. M.SimonsenB.HirnR. G.WillsH. (2019). Bridging the research-to-practice gap through effective professional development for teachers working with students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 44(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742918816447
38.
SutherlandK. S.WehbyJ. H.CopelandS. R. (2000). Effect of varying rates of behavior-specific praise on the on-task behavior of students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 8(1), 2–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/106342660000800101
39.
VannestK. J.ParkerR. I.GonenO.AdiguzelT. (2016). Single Case Research: Web-based calculators for SCR analysis (Version 2.0) [Web-based Application]. Texas A&M University. https://singlecaseresearch.org
40.
What Works Clearinghouse (WWC). (2022). What Works Clearinghouse procedures and standards handbook, version 5.0. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (NCEE). https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks
41.
WoleryM.GastD.LedfordJ. (2014). Comparison designs. In GastD.LedfordJ. (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) (pp. 297–345). Routledge; Taylor & Francis.
42.
ZaheerI.MagginD.McDanielS.McIntoshK.RodriguezB. J.FogtJ. B. (2019). Implementation of promising practices that support students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 44(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742918821331
