Coaching is a key driver supporting implementation of evidence-based instructional and behavioral practices (EBPs). The purposes of this study were to propose a model of coaching and examine the effects of two coaching mechanisms (prompting and performance feedback) on (a) teacher use of classroom management EBPs and (b) student classroom disruption. Using two counterbalanced, concurrent multiple-baseline designs across seven teachers, modest functional relations were found between highly efficient delivery of coaching using prompting alone and performance feedback alone on (a) an increase in teacher use of EBPs and (b) a decrease in classroom disruption. No consistent differences were observed in the order with which prompting versus performance feedback were introduced, nor were consistent benefits observed when adding combined versus individual use of prompting or performance feedback. Findings and implications for coaching research and practice are discussed.
AndersonM. Z. (2001). Executive coaching: A comprehensive review of the literature. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 53(4), 205–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/1061-4087.53.4.205
2.
BastableE.MassarM. M.McIntoshK. (2019). A survey of team members’ perceptions of coaching activities related to tier 1 SWPBIS implementation. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 22(1), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300719861566
3.
BlazarD.KraftM. A. (2015). Exploring mechanisms of effective teacher coaching: A tale of two cohorts from a randomized experiment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(4), 542–566. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373715579487
CarrE. G. (2007). The expanding vision of positive behavior support: Research perspectives on happiness, helpfulness, hopefulness. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007070090010201
6.
CavanaughB. (2013). Performance feedback and teachers’ use of praise and opportunities to respond: A review of the literature. Education and Treatment of Children, 36(1), 111–137. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2013.0001
EmbryD. D. (2004). Community-based prevention using simple, low-cost, evidence-based kernels and behavior vaccines. Journal of Community Psychology, 32(5), 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20020
9.
EnnisR. P.RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.DunlapK. D. (2020a). Behavior-specific praise in pre-K–12 settings: Mapping the 50-year knowledge base. Behavioral Disorders, 45(3), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742919843075
10.
EnnisR. P.RoyerD. J.LaneK. L.DunlapK. D. (2020b). The impact of coaching on teacher-delivered behavior-specific praise in pre-K–12 settings: A systematic review. Behavioral Disorders, 45(3), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742919839221
11.
EvanovichL. L.KernL. (2018). Precorrection: Preventing predictable problem behaviors in school settings. Beyond Behavior, 27(2), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074295618769892
12.
FixsenD. L.BlaseK. A.NaoomS. F.DudaM. (2015). Implementation drivers: Assessing best practices. National Implementation Research Network (NIRN), Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
FurmanM.LuzuriagaM.TaylorI.PodestáM. E. (2021). How does coaching influence teacher implementation of a science programme? Evidence from an experimental study. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 10(4), 449–465. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-09-2020-0059
15.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS. L.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 165–180.
16.
HowellK. W.Lorson-HowellK. A. (1990). What’s the hurry? Fluency in the classroom. Teaching Exceptional Children, 22(3), 20–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005999002200304
17.
JosephL. M.Alber-MorganS.NeefN. (2016). Applying behavior analytic procedures to effectively teach literacy skills in the classroom. Psychology in the Schools, 53(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21883
18.
JoyceB. R.ShowersB. (2002). Student achievement through staff development (3rd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
19.
KealeyK. A.PetersonA. V.GaulM. A.DinhK. T. (2000). Teacher training as a behavior change process: Principles and results from a longitudinal study. Health Education & Behavior, 27(1), 64–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019810002700107
20.
KnightJ. (2007). Instructional coaching: A partnership approach to improving instruction. Corwin Press.
21.
KratochwillT. R. (Ed.). (2013). Single subject research: Strategies for evaluating change. Academic Press.
22.
MacSuga-GageA. S.SimonsenB. (2015). Examining the effects of teacher-directed opportunities to respond on student outcomes: A systematic review of the literature. Education and Treatment of Children, 38(2), 211–239.
23.
MassarM. M. (2014). Descriptive analysis of coaching in implementation of evidence-based practices [Research grant results]. The Wing Institute.
24.
MassarM. M. (2017). Effects of coach-delivered prompting and performance feedback on teacher use of evidence-based classroom management practices and student behavior outcomes [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Oregon.
25.
MassarM. M.HornerR. H. (2015, October). Mechanisms of effective coaching in implementation of SWPBIS: A descriptive analysis [Paper presentation]. National PBIS Leadership Forum, Chicago, IL, United States.
26.
McIntoshK.MassarM. M.AlgozzineR. F.GeorgeH. P.HornerR. H.LewisT. J.Swain-BradwayJ. (2017). Technical adequacy of the SWPBIS tiered fidelity inventory. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 19(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300716637193
27.
McIntoshK.MonizC. A.CraftC. B.GolbyR.Steinwand-DeschambeaultT. (2014). Implementing school-wide positive behavioural interventions and supports to better meet the needs of indigenous students. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 29(3), 236–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573514542217
28.
NoellG. H.WittJ. C.SliderN. J.ConnellJ. E.GattiS. L.WilliamsK. L.KoenigJ. L.ResetarJ. L.DuhonG. J. (2005). Treatment implementation following behavioral consultation in schools: A comparison of three follow-up strategies. School Psychology Review, 34(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2005.12086277
29.
OdomS. L.DudaM. A.KucharczykS.CoxA. W.StabelA. (2014). Applying an implementation science framework for adoption of a comprehensive program for high school students with autism spectrum disorder. Remedial and Special Education, 35(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513519826
30.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J.DavisJ. L. (2014). A simple method to control positive baseline trend within data nonoverlap. The Journal of Special Education, 48(2), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466912456430
31.
RandolphK. M.DuffyM. L.BradyM. P.WilsonC. L.ScheelerM. C. (2019). The impact of icoaching on teacher-delivered opportunities to respond. Journal of Special Education Technology, 35(1), 15–25.
32.
ReinkeW. M.StormontM.HermanK. C.NewcomerL. (2014). Using coaching to support teacher implementation of classroom-based interventions. Journal of Behavioral Education, 23, 150–167. https://doi/10.1007/s10864-013-9186-0
33.
ReinkeW. M.StormontM.Webster-StrattonC.NewcomerL. L.HermanK. C. (2012). The incredible years teacher classroom management program: Using coaching to support generalization to real-world classroom settings. Psychology in the Schools, 49(5), 416–428. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21608
34.
SheridanS. M.EdwardsC. P.MarvinC. A.KnocheL. L. (2009). Professional development in early childhood programs: Process issues and research needs. Early Education and Development, 20(3), 377–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280802582795
35.
SimonsenB.FairbanksS.BrieschA.SugaiG. (2006). Classroom Management: Self-Assessment Revised. OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports. https://www.pbis.org/
36.
SimonsonB.FreemanJ.GoodmanS.MitchellB.Swain-BradwayJ.FlanneryB.SugaiG.GeorgeH.PutnamB. (2015). PBIS technical assistance brief on classroom PBIS. OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports. https://www.pbis.org/
37.
SimonsenB.MyersD. (2015). Classwide positive behavior interventions and supports: A guide to proactive classroom management. Guilford Press.
38.
TouchetteP. E. (1971). Transfer of stimulus control: Measuring the moment of transfer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 15(3), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1971.15-347
39.
VannestK. J.ParkerR. I.GonenO.AdiguzelT. (2016). Single Case Research: Web based calculators for SCR analysis (Version 2.0) [Web-based application]. Texas A&M University. www.singlecaseresearch.org
40.
Ward-HornerJ.SturmeyP. (2010). Component analyses using single-subject experimental designs: A review. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43(4), 685–704. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-685
41.
WeissM. J.PearsonN.FoleyK.PahlS. (2010). The importance of fluency outcomes in learners with autism. The Behavior Analyst Today, 11(4), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100704
