Examining the Effectiveness of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports in Reducing Exclusionary Discipline for Students With Disabilities: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review of the literature to examine the effectiveness of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS), when implemented with fidelity at Tier 1, in reducing exclusionary discipline for students with disabilities. We conducted a comprehensive search using electronic databases Education Resources Information Center (ERIC), Professional Development Collection, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, PsycINFO, and Teacher Reference Center and identified relevant studies published between 2007 and 2023. After title, abstract, article screening, and contact with principal authors, we found that a total of 10 articles met the inclusion criteria. We systematically coded these articles, and results supported a positive association between implementing PBIS at Tier 1 with fidelity and reduced rates of exclusionary discipline for students with disabilities. These findings suggest that implementing PBIS with fidelity is a promising intervention for reducing exclusionary discipline. However, further research is needed to establish a causal relationship between PBIS and reduced exclusionary discipline for students with disabilities.

Keywords

PBIS prevention of challenging behavior(s)disabilities inclusion schoolwide intervention(s)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Algozzine

Barrett

Eber

George

Horner

R. H.

Lewis

Putnam

Swain-Bradway

McIntosh

Sugai

(2014). School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory. OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports. https://www.pbisapps.org/Resources/SWIS%20Publications/SWPBIS%20Tiered%20Fidelity%20Inventory%20(TFI).pdf

Anderson

K. P.

McKenzie

(2024). Discipline disproportionality and policy reform in Arkansas: Effects of state-wide limits on exclusionary discipline in elementary school. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 29(3), 207–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2023.2168668

*Bradshaw

Waasdorp

Leaf

(2012). Effects of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports on child behavior problems. Pediatrics, 130(5), e1136–e1145. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2012-0243d

Brobbey

(2018). Punishing the vulnerable: Exploring suspension rates for students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 53(4), 216–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451217712953

Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. (2021). Supporting and responding to student’s social, emotional, and behavioral needs: Evidence-based practices for educators (Version 2.0). Center on PBIS, University of Oregon. https://www.pbis.org/resource/supporting-and-responding-to-behavior-evidence-based-classroom-strategies-for-teachers

Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. (2023). Positive behavioral interventions & supports. https://www.pbis.org/pbis/what-is-pbis

Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. (2025, February). Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) Manual. University of Oregon. https://www.pbis.org

Childs

Kincaid

George

(2010). A model for state-wide evaluation of a universal positive behavior support initiative. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12(4), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300709340699

Childs

K. E.

Kincaid

Peshak George

Gage

N. A.

(2016). The relationship between school-wide implementation of positive behavior intervention and supports and student discipline outcomes. Journal of Positive Behavior Intervention, 18, 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300715590398

10.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

11.

Cohen

(1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

12.

Cook

B. G.

(2014). A call for examining replication and bias in special education research. Remedial and Special Education, 35(4), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514528995

13.

Coyne

M. D.

Cook

B. G.

Therrien

W. J.

(2016). Recommendations for replication Research in special education: A framework of systematic, conceptual replications. Remedial and Special Education, 37(4), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516648463

14.

Crewdson

Skinner

C. H.

Wilson

Fowler

Richardson

Wilhoit

(2023). Enhancing first-grade students’ social skill performance: The interaction of tootling and activities on social skill engagement. Psychology in the Schools, 60(10), 4061–4078. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22984

15.

Cruz

R. A.

Firestone

A. R.

Rodl

J. E.

(2021). Disproportionality reduction in exclusionary school discipline: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 91(3), 397–431. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321995255

16.

Downs

K. R.

Caldarella

Larsen

R. A. A.

Charlton

C. T.

Wills

H. P.

Kamps

D. M.

Wehby

(2019). Teacher praise and reprimands: The differential response of students at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 21, 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300718800824

17.

Farkas

M. S.

Simonsen

Migdole

Donovan

M. E.

Clemens

Cicchese

(2012). Schoolwide positive behavior support in an alternative school setting: An evaluation of fidelity, outcomes, and social validity of tier 1 implementation. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20(4), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426610389615

18.

Fox

R. A.

Leif

E. S.

Moore

D. W.

Furlonger

Anderson

Sharma

(2022). A systematic review of the facilitators and barriers to the sustained implementation of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports. Education and Treatment of Children, 45(1), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-021-00056-0

19.

Freeman

Simonsen

McCoach

D. B.

Sugai

Lombardi

Horner

(2016). Relationship between school-wide positive behavior interventions and supports and academic, attendance, and behavior outcomes in high schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300715580992

20.

*Gage

N. A.

Grasley-Boy

Lombardo

Anderson

(2020). The effect of school-wide positive behavior interventions and supports on disciplinary exclusions: A conceptual replication. Behavioral Disorders, 46(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0198742919896305

21.

*Gage

N. A.

Grasley-Boy

Peshak George

Childs

Kincaid

(2019). A quasi-experimental design analysis of the effects of school-wide positive behavior interventions and supports on discipline in Florida. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 21(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300718768208

22.

Gage

N. A.

Lee

Grasley-Boy

Peshak George

(2018). The impact of school-wide behavior interventions and supports on school suspensions: A state-wide quasi-experimental analysis. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20(4), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300718768204

23.

Gage

N. A.

Whitford

D. K.

Katsiyannis

(2018). A review of schoolwide positive behavior interventions and supports as a framework for reducing disciplinary exclusions. The Journal of Special Education, 52(3), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918767847

24.

Gianicolo

E. A. L.

Eichler

Muensterer

Strauch

Blettner

(2020). Methods for evaluating causality in observational studies: Part 27 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 117(7), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2020.0101

25.

*Grasley-Boy

Gage

N. A.

Lombardo

(2019). Effect of SWPBIS on disciplinary exclusions for students with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children, 86(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402919854196

26.

*Grasley-Boy

Gage

N. A.

Lombardo

Anderson

Rila

(2022). School-wide positive behavior interventions and supports in rural and urban California schools: Effects on fidelity of implementation and suspension outcomes. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 41(2), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/87568705221092766

27.

Hill

C. J.

Bloom

H. S.

Black

A. R.

Lipsey

M. W.

(2008). Empirical benchmarks for interpreting effect sizes in research. Child Development Perspectives, 2, 172–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00061.x

28.

Horner

R. H.

Todd

A. W.

Lewis-Palmer

Irvin

L. K.

Sugai

Boland

J. B.

(2004). The school-wide evaluation tool (SET): A research instrument for assessing school-wide positive behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007040060010201

29.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA). 20 U.S.C. § 1414 (d)(3)(B)(i) (2004).

30.

Joslyn

P. R.

Austin

J. L.

Donaldson

J. M.

Vollmer

T. R.

(2020). A practitioner’s guide to the good behavior game. Behavior Analysis, 20(4), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000199

31.

Kraft

(2020). Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions. Educational Researcher, 49(4), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20912798

32.

Kraft

(2023). The effect-size benchmark that matters most: Education interventions often fail. Educational Researcher, 52(3), 183–187. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X231155154

33.

Kramarczuk Voulgarides

Aylward

. (2023). Enduring equity questions: A sequence analysis of citations in response to racial inequity via the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 34(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/10442073221114102

34.

Kranak

M. P.

Alber-Morgan

S. R.

Sawyer

M. R.

(2017). A parametric analysis of specific praise rates on the on-task behavior of elementary students with autism. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 52(4), 453–464. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26420417

35.

*Lane

K. L.

Wehby

J. H.

Robertson

E. J.

Rogers

L. A.

(2007). How do different types of high school students respond to school-wide positive behavior support programs? Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 15(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266070150010201

36.

Lee

Gage

N. A.

(2020). Updating and expanding systematic reviews and meta-analyses on the effects of school-wide positive behavior interventions and supports. Psychology in the Schools, 57, 783–804. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22336

37.

*Lee

Gage

N. A.

McLeskey

Huggins-Manley

A. C.

(2021). The impacts of school-wide positive behavior interventions and supports on school discipline outcomes for diverse students. The Elementary School Journal, 121(3), 410–429. https://doi.org/10.1086/712625

38.

*Loman

S. L.

Strickland-Cohen

M. K.

Walker

V. L.

(2018). Promoting the accessibility of SWPBIS for students with severe disabilities. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20(2), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300717733976

39.

López

Allende

Bosch

Ortiz-Mallegas

Valenzuela

J. P.

González

(2024). Exploring disproportional use of exclusionary punitive practices by disability group: Evidence of higher disproportionality in low-SES Chilean students with ADHD. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 24, 284–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12631

40.

Makel

M. C.

Plucker

J. A.

Freeman

Lombardi

Simonsen

Coyne

(2016). Replication of special education research: Necessary but far too rare. Remedial and Special Education, 37(4), 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516646083

41.

McDaid

Strickland-Cohen

M. K.

Walker

V. L.

Conradi

L. A.

(2022, July). Providing access to school-wide positive behavior interventions and supports for students with significant cognitive disabilities (TIES Center Brief #10). TIES Center and the Center on PBIS. https://www.pbis.org/resource/providing-access-to-school-wide-positive-behavioral-interventions-and-supports-for-students-with-significant-cognitive-disabilities

42.

Meyer

Sears

Putnam

Phelan

Burnett

Warden

Simonsen

(2021). Supporting students with disabilities with universal positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS): Lessons learned from research and practice. Beyond Behavior, 30(3), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/10742956211021801

43.

Moore

T. C.

Alpers

A. J.

Rhyne

Coleman

M. B.

Gordon

J. R.

Daniels

Skinner

C. H.

Park

(2019). Brief prompting to improve classroom behavior: A first-pass intervention option. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 21(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300718774881

44.

Page

M. J.

McKenzie

J. E.

Bossuyt

P. M.

Boutron

Hoffmann

T. C.

Mulrow

C. D.

Shamseer

Tetzlaff

J. M.

Akl

E. A.

Brennan

S. E.

Chou

Glanville

Grimshaw

J. M.

Hróbjartsson

Lalu

M. M.

Loder

E. W.

Mayo-Wilson

McDonald

. . . Moher

(2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLOS Medicine, 18(3), Article e1003583. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PMED.1003583

45.

Payne

Burr

(2023). Striking the tip of an iceberg: A critical analysis of school discipline and African American special education. Journal of African American Studies, 27(1), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12111-023-09619-4

46.

Ryan

T. G.

Goodram

(2013). The impact of exclusionary discipline on students. International Journal of Progressive Education, 9(2), 169–177.

47.

Santiago-Rosario

M. R.

McIntosh

Izzard

Cohen-Lissman

Calhoun

T. E.

(2023). Is positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS) an evidence-based practice? Center on PBIS, University of Oregon. www.pbis.org/resource/is-school-wide-positive-behavior-support-an-evidence-based-practice

48.

Schaeffer

(2023). What federal education data shows about students with disabilities in the U.S. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/07/24/what-federal-education-data-shows-about-students-with-disabilities-in-the-us/#:~:text=The%207.3%20million%20disabled%20students,over%20the%20last%20few%20decades

49.

Scherer

C. A.

Ingle

W. K.

(2020). PBIS implementation fidelity and student outcomes in an urban school district. Voices of Reform, 3(2), 96–117. https://doi.org/10.32623/3.10007

50.

Schmidt

(2009). Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 13, 90–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015108

51.

*Simonsen

Freeman

Gambino

A. J.

Sears

Meyer

Hoselton

(2022). An exploration of the relationship between PBIS and discipline outcomes for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 43(5), 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325211063490

52.

Simonsen

Myers

(2015). Class-wide positive behavior interventions and supports: A guide to proactive classroom management. The Guilford Press.

53.

Simonsen

Putnam

Yaneck

Evanovich

Shaw

Shuttleton

Morris

Mitchell

(2020, February). Supporting students with disabilities within a PBIS framework. Center on PBIS, University of Oregon. https://www.pbis.org/resource/supporting-students-with-disabilities-in-the-classroom-within-a-pbis-framework

54.

Stormont

M. A.

Thompson

A. M.

Elmore

(2020). The effect of STARS for students with high incidence disabilities: A randomized pilot study. Preventing School Failure, 65(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2020.1811625

55.

Sugai

Horner

R. H.

(2020). Sustaining and scaling positive behavioral interventions and supports: Implementation drivers, outcomes, and considerations. Exceptional Children, 86(2), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402919855331

56.

Sugai

Lewis-Palmer

Todd

Horner

R. H.

(2001). School-wide evaluation tool. University of Oregon.

57.

Sullivan

A. L.

Van Norman

E. R.

Klingbeil

D. A.

(2014). Exclusionary discipline of students with disabilities: Student and school characteristics predicting suspension. Remedial and Special Education, 35, 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932513519825

58.

Travers

J. C.

Cook

B. G.

Therrien

W. J.

Coyne

M. D.

(2016). Replication research and special education. Remedial and Special Education, 37(4), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516648462

59.

U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2019). GAO-19-551R accuracy of restraint and seclusion data. https://www.gao.gov/assets/700/699795.pdf

60.

Van Camp

A. M.

Wehby

J. H.

Martin

B. L. N.

Wright

J. R.

Sutherland

K. S

. (2020). Increasing opportunities to respond to intensify academic and behavioral interventions: A meta-analysis. School Psychology Review, 49(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/2372966X.2020.1717369

61.

*Vincent

Swain-Bradway

Tobin

T. J.

May

. (2011). Disciplinary referrals for culturally and linguistically diverse students with and without disabilities: Patterns resulting from school-wide positive behavior support. Exceptionality: The Official Journal of the Division for Research of the Council for Exceptional Children, 19(3), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2011.579936

62.

Walker

V. L.

Conradi

L. A.

Strickland-Cohen

M. K.

Johnson

H. N.

(2023). School-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports and students with extensive support needs: A scoping review. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 69(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2022.116232

63.

Welsh

R. O.

(2022). Schooling levels and school discipline: Examining the variation in disciplinary infractions and consequences across elementary, middle, and high schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 27(3), 270–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/10824669.2022.2041998

64.

Wiliam

(2022). How should educational research respond to the replication “crisis” in the social sciences? Reflections on the papers in the special issue. Educational Research and Evaluation, 27(1–2), 208–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2021.2022309

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB