Building From the Bottom Up: The Importance of Tier 1 Supports in the Context of Tier 2 Interventions

Abstract

School-Wide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS) relies on effective implementation of Tier 1 practices to ensure accurate identification of students in need of more intensive supports at Tier 2 or Tier 3. While measures of school-level fidelity are widely used, measures of classroom-level implementation of Tier 1 supports are less common. If classroom levels of Tier 1 supports are variable, schools may identify students for Tier 2 supports when, instead, teachers need support implementing Tier 1 in classrooms. The purpose of this case study was to assess the impact of a self-monitoring intervention, Monitoring Behavior on the Go (MoBeGo), on the academic engagement and disruptive behavior of a middle school student. Initially, the impact of the self-monitoring intervention was inadequate. In the context of evaluating the impact of a Tier 2 intervention, we identified an opportunity to assess whether a class-wide Tier 1 program, Class-Wide Function-Related Intervention Teams (CW-FIT), enhanced the effectiveness of the Tier 2 intervention. Using an A-B-BC-B-BC design, we compared the effectiveness of a Tier 2 intervention alone with a combined Tier 1 + Tier 2 intervention. When the class-wide Tier 1 program was layered on top of the Tier 2 intervention, the student’s academic engagement showed an increase in level and stability.

Keywords

classroom intervention(s) for children with or at risk for EBD self-management positive behavior support(s)

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Algozzine

Barrett

Eber

George

Horner

Lewis

Putnam

Swain-Bradway

McIntosh

Sugai

(2014). School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory [OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Interventions and Supports]. https://miblsi.org/evaluation/fidelity-assessments/school-wide-pbis-tiered-fidelity-inventory-swpbis-tfi

Birnbauer

J. S.

Peterson

C. R.

Solnick

J. V.

(1974). Design and interpretation of studies of single subjects. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 79, 191–203.

Bruhn

A. L.

McDaniel

Kreigh

(2015a). Self-monitoring interventions for students with behavior problems: A systematic review of current research. Behavioral Disorders, 40, 102–121.

Bruhn

A. L.

Vogelgesang

Fernando

Lugo

(2016). Using data to individualize a multicomponent, technology-based self-monitoring intervention. Journal of Special Education Technology, 21, 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643416650024

Bruhn

A. L.

Vogelgesang

Schabilion

Waller

Fernando

(2015b). “I don’t like being good!” Changing behavior with technology-based self-monitoring. Journal of Special Education Technology, 30, 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643415618911

Caldarella

Williams

Hansen

B. D.

Wills

(2015). Managing student behavior with Class-Wide Function-Related Intervention Teams: An observational study in early elementary classrooms. Early Childhood Education Journal, 43, 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-014-0664-3

Childs

K. E.

Kincaid

George

H. P.

Gage

N. A.

(2016). The relationship between school-wide implementation of positive behavior intervention and supports and student discipline outcomes. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18, 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300715590398

Conklin

C. G.

Kamps

Wills

(2016). Effects of Class-Wide Function-Related Intervention Teams (CW-FIT) on students’ prosocial classroom behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Education, 26, 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-016-9252-5

Downs

K. R.

Caldarella

Larsen

R. A.

Charlton

C. T.

Wills

H. P.

Kamps

D. M.

Wehby

J. H.

(2019). Teacher praise and reprimands: The differential response of students at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 21, 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300718800824

10.

Ervin

R. A.

Schaughency

Matthews

Goodman

S. D.

McGlinchey

M. T.

(2007). Primary and secondary prevention of behavior difficulties: Developing a data-informed problem-solving model to guide decision making at a school-wide level. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20201

11.

Horner

R. H.

Lewis-Palmer

Sugai

Todd

A. W.

(2005). School-wide Evaluation Tool. Educational and Community Supports, University of Oregon. https://www.pbisapps.org/Resources/SWIS%20Publications/School-Wide%20Evaluation%20Tool%20(SET).pdf

12.

Horner

R. H.

Sugai

(2015). School-wide PBIS: An example of applied behavior analysis implemented at a scale of social importance. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 8, 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-015-0045-4

13.

Kamps

Wills

H. P.

Heitzman-Powell

Laylin

Szoke

Petrillo

Culey

(2011). Class-Wide Function-Related Intervention Teams: Effects of group contingency programs in urban classrooms. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 13, 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300711398935

14.

Kincaid

Childs

George

(March, 2010). School-wide Benchmarks of Quality (Revised) [Unpublished Instrument]. Department of Child and Family Studies, University of South Florida. https://www.pbis.org/resource/benchmarks-of-quality-boq-scoring-form

15.

Lewis

T. J.

Sugai

(1999). Effective behavior support: A systems approach to proactive schoolwide management. Focus on Exceptional Children, 31, 1–24.

16.

Maggin

D. M.

Zurheide

Pickett

K. C.

Baillie

S. J.

(2015). A systematic evidence review of the check-in/check-out program for reducing student challenging behaviors. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17, 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300715573630

17.

Majeika

C. E.

Van Camp

A. M.

Wehby

J. H.

Kern

Commisso

C. E.

Gaier

(2020). An evaluation of adaptations made to check-in check-out. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 22, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300719860131

18.

Mathews

McIntosh

Frank

J. L.

May

S. L

. (2014). Critical features predicting sustained implementation of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 16, 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300713484065

19.

Simonsen

MacSuga-Gage

A. S.

Briere

D. E.

Freeman

Myers

Scott

T. M.

Sugai

(2014). Multitiered support framework for teachers’ classroom-management practices: Overview and case study of building the triangle for teachers. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 16, 179–190.

20.

Sugai

Horner

(2009). Responsiveness-to-intervention and school-wide positive behavior supports: Integration of multi-tiered system approaches. Exceptionality, 17, 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362830903235375

21.

Tapp

Wehby

J. H.

Ellis

(1995). A Multiple Option Observation System for Experimental Studies: MOOSES. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 27, 25–31.

22.

Wehby

J. H.

Dodge

K. A.

Greenberg

(1993). Classroom Atmosphere Rating Scale [Unpublished Technical Manual]. Vanderbilt University.

23.

Wills

Kamps

Caldarella

Wehby

Romine

R. S.

(2018a). Class-Wide Function-Related Intervention Teams (CW-FIT): Student and teacher outcomes from a multisite randomized replication trial. The Elementary School Journal, 119, 29–51.

24.

Wills

Kamps

Fleming

Hansen

(2016). Student and teacher outcomes of the Class-Wide Function-Related Intervention Team efficacy trial. Exceptional Children, 83, 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402916658658

25.

Wills

Wehby

J. H.

Caldarella

Kamps

Swinburne

R. T.

(2018b). Classroom management that works: A replication trial of the CW-FIT program. Exceptional Children, 84, 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918771321

26.

Wills

H. P.

Iwaszuk

W. M.

Kamps

Shumate

(2014). CW-FIT: Group contingency effects across the day. Education and Treatment of Children, 37, 191–210.