Teaching children with psychiatric disorders can be a challenging task. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of the Good Behavior Game (GBG) in children with psychiatric disorders, and their teachers, in special education. Teachers were trained by licensed school consultants to implement positive behavior support strategies to elicit desired behavior in students. A total of 389 children and their 58 teachers at 11 schools for special primary education were included in the study. Using a cluster randomized controlled design, special education schools were assigned to an intervention condition or an education as usual condition. An increase in emotional and behavioral problems was found in the control group, whereas no change was seen in the intervention group, indicating a modest intervention effect. No effects were found on children’s relationships with teachers or peers. The GBG affected teachers’ sense of self-efficacy in engaging students in schoolwork, but no effects were found on teachers’ self-efficacy in classroom management or on teachers’ burnout symptoms. Thus, although children with psychiatric disorders and their teachers in special education can benefit from the GBG, given the partial effects and modest effect sizes, a longer duration program complemented with additional elements is recommended.
AlbrechtS. F.JohnsB. H.MounstevenJ.OlorundaO. (2009). Working conditions as risk or resiliency factors for teachers of students with emotional and behavioral disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 46, 1006–1022.
2.
BarrishH. H.SaundersM.WolfM. M. (1969). Good Behavior Game: Effects of individual contingencies for group consequences on disruptive behavior in a classroom. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2, 119–124.
3.
BelliniS.PetersJ. K.BennerL.HopfA. (2007). A meta-analysis of school-based social skills interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 153–162.
4.
BuyseE.VerschuerenK.DoumenS.Van DammeJ.MaesF. (2008). Classroom problem behavior and teacher-child relationships in kindergarten: The moderating role of classroom climate. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 367–391.
5.
ChangM. (2009). An appraisal perspective of teacher burnout: Examining the emotional work of teachers. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 193–218.
6.
CoieJ. D.DodgeK. A. (1988). Multiple sources of data on social behavior and social status in the school: A cross-age comparison. Child Development, 59, 815–829.
7.
DiamantopoulouS.HenricssonL.RydellA. (2005). ADHD symptoms and peer relations of children in a community sample: Examining associated problems, self-perceptions, and gender differences. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 388–398.
8.
DolanL. J.KellamS. G.BrownC. H.Werthamer-LarssonL.RebokG. W.MayerL. S.. . . TurkkanJ. S. (1993). The short-term impact of two classroom-based preventive interventions on aggressive and shy behaviors and poor achievement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 14, 317–345.
9.
DoumenS.VerschuerenK.BuyseE.De MunterS.MaxK.MoensL. (2009). Further examination of the convergent and discriminant validity of the Student-Teacher Relationship Scale. Infant and Child Development, 18, 502–520.
10.
EmbryD. D. (2002). The Good Behavior Game: A best practice candidate as a universal behavioral vaccine. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5, 273–297.
11.
Erasmus Medical Center. (2000). Problem Behavior at School Interview. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Author.
12.
FriedmanI. A. (2000). Burnout in teachers: Shattered dreams of impeccable professional performance. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56, 595–606.
13.
GreeneR. W.BeszterczeyS. K.KatzensteinT.ParkK.GoringJ. (2002). Are students with ADHD more stressful to teach?Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 27–37.
14.
HarrisV. W.ShermanJ. A. (1973). Use and analysis of the “Good Behavior Game” to reduce disruptive classroom behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 6, 405–417.
15.
IalongoN.PoduskaJ.WerthamerL.KellamS. (2001). The distal impact of two first-grade preventive interventions on conduct problems and disorder in early adolescence. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 9, 146–160.
16.
Inspectie van het onderwijs (2010). De staat van het onderwijs. Onderwijsverslag 2008/2009. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Author.
17.
KellamS. G.AnthonyJ. C. (1998). Targeting early antecedents to prevent tobacco smoking: Findings from an epidemiologically based randomized field trial. American Journal of Public Health, 88, 1490–1495.
18.
KellamS. G.RebokG. W.IalongoN.MayerL. S. (1994). The course and malleability of aggressive behavior from early first grade into middle school: Results of a developmental epidemiologically-based preventive trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 259–281.
19.
KohlsG.Herpertz-DahlmannB.KonradK. (2009). Hyperresponsiveness to social rewards in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Behavioral and Brain Functions, 5, Article 20.
20.
KoomenH. M. Y.VerschuerenK.PiantaR. C. (2007). Student-teacher relationship scale [Leerkracht-leerling relatie vragenlijst]. Houten, The Netherlands: Bohn Stafleu en Van Loghum.
21.
LeflotG.Van LierP. A. C.OnghenaP.ColpinH. (2010). The role of teacher behavior management in the development of disruptive behaviors: An intervention study with the Good Behavior Game. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 869–882.
22.
MainhardM. T.BrekelmansM.Den BrokP.WubbelsT. (2011). The development of the classroom social climate during the first months of the school year. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 190–200.
23.
MainhardM. T.BrekelmansM.WubbelsT. (2011). Coercive and supportive teacher behaviour: Within- and across-lesson associations with the classroom social climate. Learning and Instruction, 21, 345–354.
24.
MaslachC.SchaufeliW. B.LeiterM. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422.
25.
MeijerC. J. W. (2003). Special education across Europe: Trends in provision in 18 European countries. Brussels, Belgium: European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education.
26.
Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap. (2003). Regulation indication criteria pupil funding (Beleidsnota No. PO/LGF-2003/7110). Den Haag, The Netherlands: Author.
27.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
28.
NederkoornY. (2009). Expanding the Good Behavior Game for special education: Good Behavior Game adjustments for special education [Taakspel is bouwen SBO en SO: Aanpassingen voor taakspel in het speciaal basisonderwijs en speciaal onderwijs]. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: CED-groep.
29.
NolanJ. D.HoulihanD.WanzekM.JensonW. R. (2014). The Good Behavior Game: A classroom-behavior intervention effective across cultures. School Psychology International, 35, 191–205.
30.
PetrasH.KellamS. G.BrownC. H.MuthénB. O.IalongoN.PoduskaJ. M. (2008). Developmental epidemiological courses leading to antisocial personality disorder and violent and criminal behavior: Effects by young adulthood of a universal preventive intervention in first- and second-grade classrooms. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 95, 45–59.
31.
QuinnM. M.KavaleK. A.MathurS. R.RutherfordR. B. J.FornessS. R. (1999). A meta-analysis of social skill interventions for students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 7, 54–64.
32.
SchaufeliW. B.Van DierendonckD. (2000). Manual of the Burnout Scale Utrecht (UBOS) [Handleiding van de UBOS]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
33.
SpiltJ. L.KoomenH. M. Y.ThijsJ. T. (2011). Teacher wellbeing: The importance of teacher-student relationships. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 457–477.
34.
SutherlandK. S.Lewis-PalmerT.StichterJ.MorganP. L. (2008). Examining the influence of teacher behavior and classroom context on the behavioral and academic outcomes for students with emotional or behavioral disorders. The Journal of Special Education, 41, 223–233.
35.
TankersleyM. (1995). A group-oriented contingency management program. Preventing School Failure, 40, 19–24.
36.
TingstromD. H. (2006). The Good Behavior Game: An investigation of teachers’ acceptance. Psychology in the Schools, 31, 57–65.
37.
Tschannen-MoranM.HoyA. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805.
38.
Van der SarA. M.GoudswaardM. (2001). Good Behavior Game teacher manual for primary education [Docentenhandleiding taakspel voor basisonderwijs]. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: CED-groep.
39.
Van LierP. A. C.MuthénB. O.Van der SarA. M.CrijnenA. M. (2004). Preventing disruptive behavior in elementary schoolchildren: Impact of a universal classroom-based intervention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 467–478.
40.
Van LierP. A. C.VuijkP.CrijnenA. M. (2005). Understanding mechanisms of change in the development of antisocial behavior: The impact of a universal intervention. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 521–535.
41.
WitvlietM.Van LierP. A. C.CuijpersP.KootH. M. (2009). Testing links between childhood positive peer relations and externalizing outcomes through a randomized controlled intervention study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 905–915.
42.
WrightR. A.McCurdyB. L. (2012). Class-wide positive behavior support and group contingencies: Examining a positive variation of the Good Behavior Game. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14, 173–180.
43.
WubbelsT.BrekelmansM. (2005). Two decades of research on teacher–student relationships in class. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 6–24.
44.
WubbelsT.LevyJ. (1991). A comparison of interpersonal behavior of Dutch and American teachers. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 15, 1–18.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
