Paraprofessionals report spending a substantial amount of time addressing challenging behavior in a range of school environments, yet identify behavioral intervention as a high-priority training area. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to systematically review and summarize single-case intervention studies involving paraprofessional-delivered behavioral interventions for students with disabilities. Descriptive findings suggest that, among the reviewed studies, paraprofessionals primarily provided behavioral support to students with autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, and multiple disabilities who engage in a wide range of challenging behaviors in both inclusive and noninclusive school environments. Overall, training largely was delivered by researchers and resulted in positive paraprofessional implementation outcomes. Likewise, paraprofessional-implemented behavioral interventions contributed to desirable changes in student challenging and appropriate behavior, with effect size estimates significantly higher for interventions delivered to early childhood–age students and within inclusive school settings. Implications for practice, limitations, and future research directions are described.
BiggsE. E.GilsonC. B.CarterE. W. (2019). “Developing that balance”: Preparing and supporting special education teachers to work with paraprofessionals. Teacher Education and Special Education, 42, 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406418765611
2.
*BinghamM. A.SpoonerF.BrowderD. (2007). Training paraeducators to promote the use of augmentative and alternative communication by students with significant disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 42, 339–352.
3.
*BlairC. K.UmbreitJ.DunlapG.JungG. (2007). Promoting inclusion and peer participation through assessment-based intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 27, 134–147.
4.
BrockM. E.CarterE. W. (2013). A systematic review of paraprofessional-delivered educational practices to improve outcomes for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 38, 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079691303800401
5.
BrockM. E.CarterE. W. (2017). A meta-analysis of educator training to improve implemenation of interventions for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 38, 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932516653477
6.
*BrockM. E.SeamanR. L.DowningC. (2017). Promoting learning for a student with a severe disability through paraprofessional training. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 42, 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796917729682
7.
CarterE.O’RourkeL.SiscoL. G.PelsueD. (2009). Knowledge, responsibilities, and training needs of paraprofessionals in elementary and secondary schools. Remedial and Special Education, 30, 344–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508324399
8.
*Causton-TheoharisJ. N.MalmgrenK. W. (2005). Increasing peer interactions for students with severe disabilities through paraprofessional training. Exceptional Children, 71, 431–444.
9.
*CipaniA. (2018). Utilizing paraeducators to increase treatment integrity of behavior interventions through the use of performance feedback [Doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database. (Accession No. 10827009)
10.
*ColeC. L.LevinsonT. R. (2002). Effects of within-activity choices on the challenging behavior of children with severe developmental disabilities. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 4, 29–37.
11.
*ConroyM. A.AsmusJ. M.SellersJ. A.LadwigC. N. (2005). The use of an antecedent-based intervention to decrease stereotypic behavior in a general education classroom: A case study. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 223–230.
12.
CooperH.HedgesL. V.ValentineJ. C. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed.). Russell Sage Foundation.
13.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2015). What every special educator must know: Professional ethics and standards (7th ed.).
14.
*CourtemancheA.SheldonJ.ShermanJ.SchorederS.BellA.HouseR. (2014). Assessing the effects of a staff training package on the treatment integrity of an intervention for self-injurious behavior. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26, 371–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-014-9372-6
15.
*DibN.SturmeyP. (2007). Reducing student stereotypy by improving teachers’ implementation of discrete-trial teaching. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 339–343.
16.
DouglasS. N.ChapinS. E.NolanJ. (2016). Special education teachers’ experiences supporting and supervising paraeducators: Implications for special and general education settings. Teacher Education and Special Education, 39, 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406415616443
17.
DrevonD.FursaS. P.MalcolmA. L. (2017). Intercoder reliability and validity of WebPlotDigitizer in extracting graphed data. Behavior Modification, 41, 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445516673998
18.
EmersonE.KiernanC.AlborzA.ReevesD.MasonH.SwarbrickR.MasonL.HattonC. (2001). The prevalence of challenging behaviors: A total population study. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 22, 77–93.
19.
FallonL. M.Collier-MeekM. A.MagginD. A.SanettiL. M.JohnsonA. H. (2015). Is performance feedback for educators an evidence-based practice? A systematic review and evaluation based on single-case research. Exceptional Children, 81, 227–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914551738
20.
FisherM.PleasantsS. L. (2012). Roles, responsibilities, and concerns of paraeducators: Findings from a statewide survey. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 287–297.
21.
FlowerA.McKennaJ. W.HaringC. D. (2017). Behavior and classroom management: Are teacher preparation programs really preparing our teachers?Preventing School Failure, 61, 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2016.1231109
22.
GageN. A.CookG. B.ReichowB. (2017). Publication bias in special education meta-analyses. Exceptional Children, 83, 428–445. https://doi.org/11/1177/0014402917691016
23.
GiangrecoM. F.BroerS. M. (2005). Questionable utilization of paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: Are we addressing symptoms of causes?Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 10–26.
24.
GiangrecoM. F.SuterJ. S.DoyleM. (2010). Paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: A review of recent research. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20, 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474410903535356
25.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practices in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100203
26.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).
27.
IngramK.Lewis-PalmerT.SugaiG. (2005). Function-based intervention planning: Comparing the effectiveness of FBA function-based and non-function-based intervention plans. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7, 224–236.
LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (2018). Single case research methodology (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
30.
MagginD.BrieschA.ChafouleasS. M. (2013). An application of the What Works Clearinghouse standards for evaluation single-subject research: Synthesis of the self-management literature base. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 44–58.
31.
*MahonJ. (2018). An experimental and descriptive analysis of a multilevel consultation model to support paraprofessionals in implementing behavioral interventions in an early childhood special education setting [Doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database. (Accession No. 10684719)
32.
*MartellaR. C.MacfarlaneC. A.YoungK. R. (1993). Improving the classroom behaviour of a student with severe disabilities via paraprofessional training. B.C. Journal of Special Education, 17, 33–44.
33.
McClintockK.HallS.OliverC. (2003). Risk markers associated with challenging behaviours in people with intellectual disabilities: A meta-analytic study. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 47, 405–416.
34.
*McCullochE. B.NoonanM. J. (2013). Impact of online training videos on the implementation of mand training by three elementary school paraprofessionals. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 132–141.
35.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J.DavisJ. L.SauberS. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42, 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
36.
PoppesP.van der PuttenA. J. J.VlaskampC. (2010). Frequency and severity of challenging behaviour in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31, 1269–1275.
37.
*QuiltyK. M. (2007). Teaching paraprofessionals how to write and implement Social Stories for student with autism spectrum disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 182–189.
38.
*ReevesL. M.UmbreitJ.FerroJ. B.LiaupsinC. J. (2013). Function-based intervention to support the inclusion of students with autism. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 379–391.
39.
ReichleJ.ChenM. (2016). Challenging behavior and communicative alternatives. In SevcikR. A.RomskiM. (Eds.), Communication interventions for individuals with severe disabilities (pp. 35–74). Paul H. Brookes.
40.
RispoliM.NeelyL.LangR.GanzJ. (2011). Training paraprofessionals to implement interventions for people autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 14, 378–388. https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2011.620577
*SmithJ. M. (2017). Behavior skills training of differential reinforcement of alternative behavior for three paraprofessionals working in inclusive classrooms [Doctoral dissertation]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global database. (Accession No. 10692604)
43.
SnellM. E.BradyN.McLeanL.OgletreeB. T.SiegelE.SylvesterL.SevcikR. (2010). Twenty years of communication intervention research for individuals who have severe intellectual and developmental disabilities. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 115, 364–380.
44.
SobeckE. E.RobertsonR. (2019). Perspectives on current practices and barriers to training for paraeducators of students with autism in inclusive settings. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 151–159.
45.
SuhrheinrichJ. (2015). A sustainable model for training teachers to use pivotal response training. Autism, 19, 713–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361314552200
VannestK. J.NinciJ. (2015). Evaluating intervention effects in single-case research designs. Journal of Counseling & Development, 93, 403–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcad.12038
48.
VannestK. J.ParkerR. I.GonenO.AdiguzelT. (2016). Single case research: Web based calculators for SCR analysis (Version 2.0) [Web-based applications]. Texas A&M University. www.singlecaseresearch.org
49.
WalkerV. L.ChungY.BonnetL. K. (2018). Function-based intervention in inclusive school settings: A meta-analysis. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20, 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300717718350
50.
WalkerV. L.DouglasK. H.DouglasS. N.D’AgostinoS. R. (in press). Paraprofessional-implemented systematic instruction for students with disabilities: A systematic literature review. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities.
51.
WalkerV. L.SmithC. (2015). Training paraprofessionals to support students with disabilities: A literature review. Exceptionality, 22, 170–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2014.986606
52.
*WalkerV. L.SnellM. E. (2017). Teaching paraprofessionals to implement function-based interventions. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 32, 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357616673561
53.
*WallerR. D.HigbeeT. S. (2010). The effects of fixed-time escape on inappropriate and appropriate classroom behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 149–153.
54.
WisemanK. V.McArdellL. E.BottiniS. B.GillisJ. M. (2017). A meta-analysis of safety skill interventions for children, adolescents, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 4, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-016-0096-7
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
