The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of workshops and coaching on paraprofessional implementation of function-based interventions. The results of indirect and direct functional behavior assessment guided the development of intervention strategies for three students with autism and intellectual disability. Following intervention, students’ appropriate behavior increased and challenging behavior decreased. In general, paraprofessionals implemented strategies with high levels of fidelity and judged both the coaching and workshop training procedures and student intervention strategies as socially valid. Implications for practice, limitations, and suggestions for future research are discussed.
AlbinR. W.LucyshynJ.HornerR. H. M.FlanneryK. B. (1996). Contextual fit for behavioral support plans. In KoegilL.KoegilR.DunlapG. (Eds.), Positive behavioral support: Including people with difficult behaviors in the community (pp. 81–97). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
2.
BakemanR.GottmanJ. M. (Eds.). (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3.
BambaraL. M.KernL. (Eds.). (2005). Individualized supports for students with problem behaviors: Designing positive behavior plans. New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
4.
BessetteK. K.WillsH. P. (2007). An example of an elementary school paraprofessional-implemented functional analysis and intervention. Behavioral Disorders, 32, 192–210.
BrockM. E.CarterE. W. (2013). A systematic review of paraprofessional-delivered interventions to improve outcomes for students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 38, 211–221.
7.
BrownL.FarringtonK.KnightT.RossC.ZieglerM. (1999). Fewer paraprofessionals and more teachers and therapists in educational programs for students with significant disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24, 250–253.
8.
BrownL.SherbenouR. J.JohnsenS. K. (1997). Test of Nonverbal Intelligence (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
9.
DavisJ. R.RawanaE. P.CapponiD. K. (1989). Acceptability of behavioral staff management techniques. Behavioral Interventions, 4, 23–44.
10.
DossS.ReichleJ. (1991). Replacing excessive behavior with an initial communicative repertoire. In ReichleJ.YorkJ.SigafoosJ. (Eds.), Implementing augmentative and alternative communication: Strategies for learners with severe disabilities (pp. 101–112). Baltimore, MD: Brookes publishing.
11.
DoyleM. B. (2002). The paraprofessional’s guide to the inclusive classroom: Working as a team (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
12.
DunlapG.FoxL. (2011). Function-based interventions for children with challenging behavior. Journal of Early Intervention, 33, 333–343. doi:10.1177/1053815111429971
13.
DunlapG.IovannoneR.WilsonK.KincaidD.StrainP. (2010). Prevent-Teach-Reinforce: A standardized model of school-based behavioral intervention. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12, 9–22.
14.
ElliottC. D. (2007). Differential Ability Scales (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
15.
FoxL.SmithB. J. (2007). Promoting social, emotional, and behavioral outcomes of young children served under IDEA (Issue brief). Center on the Social and Emotional Foundation for Early Learning, Technical Assistance Center on Social Emotional Intervention for Young Children. Retrieved January, 2013 from http://www.challengingbehavior.org/do/resources/documents/brief_promoting.pdf
16.
GiangrecoM. F.BroerS. M. (2005). Questionable utilization of paraprofessionals in inclusive schools: Are we addressing symptoms or causes?Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 10–26.
17.
GiangrecoM. F.EdelmanS. W.BroerS. M.DoyleM. B. (2001). Paraprofessional support of students with disabilities: Literature from the past decade. Exceptional Children, 68, 45–63.
18.
GohA. E.BambaraL. M. (2012). Individualized positive behavior support in school settings: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 271–286.
19.
HarrisonP. L.OaklandT. (2003). Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
20.
HornerR. H.AlbinR. W.ToddA. W.NewtonJ. S.SpragueJ. R. (2011). Designing and implementing individualized positive behavior support. In SnellM. E.BrownF. (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (pp. 257–303). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
21.
KazdinA. E. (2010). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22.
KretlowA. G.BartholomewC. (2010). Using coaching to improve the fidelity of evidence-based practices: A review of studies. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33, 279–299.
23.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310
24.
LedfordJ. R.WoleryM. (2013). Procedural fidelity: An analysis of measurement and reporting practices. Journal of Early Intervention, 35, 173–193.
O’NeillR. E.HornerR. H.AlbinR. W.SpragueJ. R.StoreyK.NewtonJ. S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
27.
PaclawskyjT. R.MatsonJ. L.RushK. S.SmallsY.VollmerT. R. (2000). Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF): A behavior checklist for functional assessment of aberrant behavior. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 21, 223–229.
28.
PindiproluS. S.PetersonS. M.BerglofH. (2007). School personnel’s professional development needs and skill level with functional behavior assessments in ten Midwestern states in the United States: Analysis and issues. The Journal of the International Association of Special Education, 8, 33–42.
29.
RispoliM.NeelyL.LangR.GanzJ. B. (2011). Training paraprofessionals to implement interventions for people with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 14, 378–388.
30.
RoberstonK.ChamberlainC.KasariC. (2003). General education teachers’ relationships with included students with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 33, 123-130. doi:10.1023/A:1022979108096
31.
RobinsonS. E. (2011). Teaching paraprofessionals of students with autism to implement pivotal response treatment in inclusive school settings using a brief video feedback training package. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 26, 105–118.
32.
RodriguezB. J.LomanS. L.HornerR. H. (2009). A preliminary analysis of the effects of coaching feedback on teacher implementation fidelity of first step to success. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2(2), 11–21.
33.
SnellM. E.VoorheesM. D.WalkerV. L.BerlinR. A.JamisonK. R.Stanton-ChapmanT. L. (2014). A demonstration of the universal problem-solving approach to address children’s inappropriate behaviors in Head Start classrooms. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 34, 4-15. doi:10.1177/0271121413491836
34.
SugaiG.HornerR. (2006). A promising approach for expanding and sustaining school-wide positive behavior support. School Psychology, 35, 245–259.
35.
Von BrockM. B.ElliottS. N. (1987). Influence of treatment effectiveness information on the acceptability of classroom interventions. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 131–144.
36.
VoorheesM.WalkerV. L.SnellM. E.SmithC. (2013). A demonstration of individualized positive behavior support interventions by Head Start staff to address children’s challenging behavior. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 38, 173-185. doi: 10.1177/154079691303800304
37.
WalkerV. L. (2016). Assessing paraprofessionals’ perceived educational needs and skill level with function-based behavioral intervention. Exceptionality. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/09362835.2016.1196443
38.
WalkerV. L.SmithC. (2015). Training paraprofessionals to support students with disabilities: A literature review. Exceptionality, 22, 1-22. doi:10.1080/09362835.2014.986606
39.
WoodB. K.FerroJ. B.UmbreitJ.LiaupsinC. J. (2011). Addressing the challenging behavior of young children through systematic function-based intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 30, 221–232.
