To improve reading achievement, teachers must ensure students actively engage in productive and meaningful reading tasks. Students with an established history of reading difficulty—including those with reading disabilities—may, over time, develop behaviors for passive and active avoidance of reading tasks. The current study explored the effects of a behavioral intervention on the latency to engagement in reading tasks for middle school students with (n = 3) and without (n = 3) reading disabilities. A multicomponent intervention using planning, goal setting, and performance feedback was examined using a multiple baseline across participants design. Results of visual analysis indicated a functional relation between changes in latency and implementation of the intervention. Quantitative analysis indicated a strong overall effect that is statistically significant, Tau-U = −0.85, 95% CI = [–1, –0.35], p < .01. Limitations and recommendations for future research are discussed.
AlldayA. R.BushM.TicknorN.WalkerL. (2011). Using teacher greetings to increase speed to task engagement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 393–396. doi:10.1901/jaba.2011.44-393
2.
BandaD. R.KubinaR. M.Jr. (2009). Increasing Academic Compliance with Mathematics Tasks Using the High-Preference Strategy with a Student with Autism. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 54(2), 81–85. doi:10.1080/10459880903217564
3.
CariniR. M.KuhG. D.KleinS. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47, 1–32. doi:10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9
ClearyT. J.ZimmermanB. J. (2004). Self-regulation empowerment program: A school-based program to enhance self-regulated and self-motivated cycles of student learning. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 537–550. doi:10.1002/pits.10177
6.
CoddingR. S.SmythC. A. (2008). Using performance feedback to decrease classroom transition time and examine collateral effects on academic engagement. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 18, 325–345. doi:10.1080/10474410802463312
7.
De PryR. L.SugaiG. (2002). The effect of active supervision and pre-correction on minor behavioral incidents in a sixth grade general education classroom. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11, 255–267. doi:10.1023/A:1021162906622
8.
FerrariJ. R.TiceD. M. (2000). Procrastination as a self-handicap for men and women: A task-avoidance strategy in a laboratory setting. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 73–83. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1999.2261
9.
FredricksJ. A.BlumenfeldP. C.ParisA. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059
GoodT. L.BeckermanT. M. (1978). Time on task: A naturalistic study in sixth-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 78, 193–201. doi:10.1086/461101
12.
GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (1992). Self-regulated strategy development: Programmatic research in writing. In WongB. Y. L. (Ed.), Contemporary intervention research in learning disabilities: An international perspective (1st ed., pp. 47–64). New York, NY: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2786-1_3
13.
GreenwoodC. R.HortonB. T.UtleyC. A. (2002). Academic engagement: Current perspectives on research and practice. School Psychology Review, 31, 328–349.
14.
HollowoodT. M.SalisburyC. L.RainforthB.PalombaroM. M. (1994). Use of instructional time in classrooms serving students with and without severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 61, 242–253.
15.
KuhG. D. (2009). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2009, 5–20. doi:10.1002/ir.283
16.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.EnnisR. P.BezdekJ. (2013). School-wide systems to promote positive behaviors and facilitate instruction. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 7(1), 6–31. doi:10.3776/joci.2013.v7n1pp6-31
17.
LaneK. L.MenziesH. M.EnnisR. P.OakesW. P. (2018). Effective Low-Intensity Strategies to Enhance School Success: What Every Educator Needs to Know. Beyond Behavior, 107429561879904. doi:10.1177/1074295618799044
LosinskiM.SandersS.KatsiyannisA.WisemanN. (2017). A meta-analysis of interventions to improve the compliance of students with disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 40, 435–463. doi:10.1353/etc.2017.0020
20.
MaagJ. W. (2001). Rewarded by punishment: Reflections on the disuse of positive reinforcement in schools. Exceptional Children, 67, 173–186. doi:10.1177/001440290106700203
21.
MaagJ. W.AndersonJ. M. (2007). Sound-field amplification to increase compliance to directions in students with ADHD. Behavioral Disorders, 32, 238–253.
22.
MarksH. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 153–184. doi:10.3102/00028312037001153
23.
MeeceJ. L.AndermanE. M.AndermanL. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487–503. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070258
24.
MorganP. L.FarkasG.TufisP. A.SperlingR. A. (2008). Are reading and behavior problems risk factors for each other?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 417–436. doi:10.1177/0022219408321123
25.
National Research Council. (2004). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students’ motivation to learn. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.5860/CHOICE.42-1079
26.
NeffK. D.HsiehY. P.DejitteratK. (2005). Self-compassion, achievement goals, and coping with academic failure. Self and Identity, 4, 263–287. doi:10.1080/13576500444000317
27.
Page-VothV.GrahamS. (1999). Effects of goal setting and strategy use on the writing performance and self-efficacy of students with writing and learning problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 230–240. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.230
28.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J. (2012). Bottom-up analysis of single-case research designs. Journal of Behavioral Education, 21, 254–265. doi:10.1007/s10864-012-9153-1
29.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J.DavisJ. L.SauberS. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42, 284–299. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2010.08.006
30.
PattersonG. R. (1975). Families: Applications of social learning to family life. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
31.
RobertsG.TorgesenJ. K.BoardmanA.ScammaccaN. (2008). Evidence-Based Strategies for Reading Instruction of Older Students with Learning Disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23(2), 63–69. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2008.00264.x
32.
RyanA. M.PintrichP. R.MidgleyC. (2001). Avoiding seeking help in the classroom: Who and why?Educational Psychology Review, 13, 93–114.
33.
SchunkD. H. (1985). Participation in goal setting: Effects on self-efficacy and skills of learning disabled children. The Journal of Special Education, 19, 307–317. doi:10.1177/002246698501900307
34.
SchunkD. H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 25, 71–86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2501_6
35.
StevensonN. (2016). Effects of planning and goal setting on reducing latency to task engagement for struggling readers in middle school. Journal of Behavioral Education, 25, 206–222. doi:10.1007/s10864-015-9238-8
36.
TarlowK. R. (2017). An improved rank correlation effect size statistic for single-case designs: Baseline corrected Tau. Behavior Modification, 41, 427–467. doi:10.1177/0145445516676750
WehbyJ. H.HollahanM. S. (2000). Effects of high-probability requests on the latency to initiate academic tasks. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 259–262. doi:10.1901/jaba.2000.33-259
39.
ZimmermanB. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP. R.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (2nd ed., pp. 13–39). Burlington, MA: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50031-7
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
