School discipline continues to be a challenge for schools, resulting in loss of instructional time for both teachers and students. With respect to discipline actions, school suspension is one of the most widely used, yet research continues to demonstrate an empirical link between receipt of suspension and poor student outcomes, including increased risk of dropping out of school. Therefore, interventions with empirical support for reducing school-wide disciplinary actions are needed. This study examined the effect of school-wide positive behavior interventions and supports (SWPBIS) on disciplinary actions using quasi-experimental design analysis. We (propensity score) matched 593 Florida schools implementing SWPBIS with fidelity with 593 Florida schools that have never been trained. Overall, we found statistically significantly fewer out-of-school suspensions for students with disabilities and Black students within schools implementing SWPBIS with fidelity and an effect size of −0.55, indicating meaningful improvements.
AlgozzineB.WangC.WhiteR.CookeN.MarrM. B.AlgozzineK.. . . Zamora DuranG. (2012). Effects of multi-tier academic and behavior instruction on difficult-to-teach students. Exceptional Children, 79, 45–64. doi:10.1177/001440291207900103
2.
ArciaE. (2006). Achievement and enrollment status of suspended students: Outcomes in a large, multicultural school district. Education and Urban Society, 38, 359–369. doi:10.1177/0013124506286947
3.
BarretD. E.KatsiyannisA. (2016). Juvenile offending and crime in early adulthood: A large sample analysis. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 1086–1097. doi:10.1007/s10826-015-0304-6
4.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley.
5.
BradshawC. P.KothC. W.BevansK. B.IalongoN.LeafP. J. (2008). The impact of school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) on the organizational health of elementary schools. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 462–472. doi:10.1037/a0012883
6.
BradshawC. P.KothC. W.ThorntonL. A.LeafP. J. (2009). Altering school climate through school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Findings from a group-randomized effectiveness trial. Prevention Science, 10, 100–115. doi:10.1007/s11121-008-0114-9
7.
BradshawC. P.MitchellM. M.LeafP. J. (2010). Examining the effects of schoolwide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports on student outcomes: Results from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial in elementary schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12, 133–148. doi:10.1177/1098300709334798
8.
CaldarellaP.ShatzerR. H.GrayK. M.YoungK. R.YoungE. L. (2011). The effects of school-wide positive behavior support on middle school climate and student outcomes. RMLE Online, 35(4), 1–14. doi:10.1080/19404476.2011.11462087
9.
ChildsK. E.KincaidD.GeorgeH. P.GageN. A. (2016). The relationship between school-wide implementation of positive behavior intervention and supports and student discipline outcomes. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18, 89–99. doi:10.1177/1098300715590398
10.
CohenR.KincaidD.ChildsK. (2007). Measuring school-wide positive behavior support implementation: Development and validation of the Benchmarks of Quality (BoQ). Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9, 203–213. doi:10.1177/10983007070090040301
11.
CroneD. A.HawkenL. S.HornerR. H. (2010). Responding to problem behavior in schools: The behavior education program (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12.
FlanneryK. B.FenningP.KatoM. M.McIntoshK. (2014). Effects of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports and fidelity of implementation on problem behavior in high schools. School Psychology Quarterly, 29, 111–124. doi:10.1037/spq0000039
13.
FortsonK.Verbitsky-SavitzN.KopaE.GleasonP. (2012). Using an experimental evaluation of charter schools to test whether nonexperimental comparison group methods can replicate experimental impact estimates (NCEE technical methods report 2012-4019). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
14.
GageN. A.FreemanJ.HornerR. H.SugaiG.LewisT. J.Strickland-CohenK. (2014). Funding support for school-wide positive behavior interventions and supports implementation and scale-up: A descriptive study of nine states. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 25, 164–174. doi:10.1177/1044207313488943
15.
GageN. A.LeiteW.ChildsK.KincaidD. (2017). Average treatment effect of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports on school-level academic achievement in Florida. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 19, 158–167. doi:10.1177/1098300717693556
16.
GagnonJ. C.GurelS.BarberB. R. (2017). State-level analysis of school punitive discipline practices in Florida state-level analysis of school punitive discipline practices in Florida. Behavioral Disorders, 42, 65–80. doi:10.1177/0198742916688652
17.
GershoffE. T.FontS. A. (2016). Corporal punishment in U.S. public schools: Prevalence, disparities in use, and status in state and federal policySocial Policy Report: Society for Research in Child Development, 30(1), 1–26.
18.
GershoffE. T.Grogan-KaylorA. (2016). Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses. Journal of Family Psychology, 30, 453–469. doi:10.1037/fam0000191
19.
HansenB. B.FredricksonM.BucknerJ.ErricksonJ.SolenbergerP. (2016). Optmatch: Functions for optimal matching (R package version 0.9-6). Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/optmatch/
20.
HansenB. B.KlopferS. O. (2006). Optimal full matching and related designs via network flows. Journal of Computational and Graphical Studies, 15, 609–627. doi:10.1198/106186006X137047
21.
HoD.ImaiK.KingG.StuartE.WhitworthA. (2017). MatchIt: Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. Journal of Statistical Software, 42(8), 1–28. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v42/i08/
22.
HornerR. H.SugaiG.AndersonC. M. (2010). Examining the evidence base for school-wide positive behavior support. Focus on Exceptionality, 42(8), 1–14.
23.
JackmanS. (2015). pscl: Classes and methods for R developed in the Political Science Computational Laboratory, Stanford University (R Package Version 1.4.9). Stanford, CA. Department of Political Science, Stanford University. Available from http://pscl.stanford.edu/
24.
KincaidD.ChildsK.GeorgeH. P. (2005, 2010). School-wide Benchmarks of Quality (BoQ). Unpublished instrument, Department of Child & Family Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pscl/pscl.pdf
25.
KrezmienM. P.LeoneP. E.AchillesG. M. (2006). Suspension, race, and disability: Analysis of statewide practices and reporting. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 217–226.
26.
LeiteW. (2017). Propensity score methods using R. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
27.
LongJ. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
MayS.ArdW.ToddA. W.HornerR. H.GlasgowA.SugaiG.SpragueJ. R. (2003). School-wide information system. Eugene: Educational and Community Supports, University of Oregon.
30.
MitchellB. S.StormontM.GageN. A. (2011). Tier two interventions implemented within the context of a tiered prevention framework. Behavioral Disorders, 36, 241–261.
31.
MowenT.BrentJ. (2016). School discipline as a turning point: The cumulative effect of suspension on arrest. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 53, 628–653. doi:10.1177/0022427816643135
32.
NelsonJ. R.MartellaR. M.Marchand-MartellaN. (2002). Maximizing student learning: The effects of a comprehensive school-based program for preventing problem behaviors. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10, 136–148. doi:10.1177/10634266020100030201
33.
NoltemeyerA. L.WardR. M.McLoughlinC. (2015). Relationship between school suspension and student outcomes: A meta-analysis. School Psychology Review, 44, 224–240. doi:10.17105/spr-14-0008.1
34.
OSEP Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. (2017). Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports [Website]. Available from www.pbis.org
35.
RauschM. K.SkibaR. (2004). Disproportionality in school discipline among minority students in Indiana: Description and analysis. Children left behind policy briefs (Supplementary Analysis 2-A). Bloomington: Center for Evaluation and Education Policy, Indiana University.
36.
R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from https://www.r-project.org/
37.
RosenbaumP. R. (1989). Optimal matching for observational studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84, 1024–1032.
38.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.
39.
RubinD. B. (2007). The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: Parallels with the design of randomized trials. Statistics in Medicine, 26, 20–36.
40.
SadlerC.SugaiG. (2009). Effective behavior and instructional support: A district model for early identification and prevention of reading and behavior problems. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 11, 35–46. doi:10.1177/1098300708322444
41.
SimonsenB.EberL.BlackA. C.SugaiG.LewandowskiH.SimsB.MeyersD. (2012). Illinois statewide positive behavioral interventions and supports: Evolution and impact on student outcomes across years. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14, 5–16. doi:10.1177/1098300711412601
SkibaR. J.HornerR. H.ChungC. G.RauschM. K.MayS. L.TobinT. (2011). Race is not neutral: A national investigation of Black and Latino disproportionality in school discipline. School Psychology Review, 40(1), 85–107.
44.
SkibaR. J.MichaelR. S.NardoA. C.PetersonR. L. (2002). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. The Urban Review, 34, 317–342.
45.
SnyderT. D.de BreyC.DillowS. A. (2016). Digest of education statistics 2014 (NCES 2016-006). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
46.
SnyderT. D.DillowS. A. (2015). Digest of education statistics 2013 (NCES 2015-011). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
47.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2009). Defining and describing schoolwide positive behavior support. In SailorW.DunlapG.SugaiG.HornerR. (Eds.), Handbook of positive behavior support (pp. 307–326). New York, NY: Springer Science + Business Media.
48.
Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports. (2015). Positive behavioral interventions and supports implementation blueprint: Part 1—Foundations and supporting information. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.
49.
VincentC. G.Swain-BradwayJ.TobinT. J.MayS. (2011). Disciplinary referrals for culturally and linguistically diverse students with and without disabilities: Patterns resulting from school-wide positive behavior support. Exceptionality, 19, 175–190. doi:10.1080/09362835.2011.579936
50.
VincentC. G.TobinT. (2011). The relationship between implementation of School-Wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBS) and disciplinary exclusion of students from various ethnic backgrounds with and without disabilities. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 19, 217–232. doi:10.1177/1063426610377329
51.
WaasdorpT. E.BradshawC. P.LeafP. J. (2012). The impact of schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports on bullying and peer rejection: A randomized controlled effectiveness trial. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 166, 149–156.
