Mental Health Services,Free Appropriate Public Education,and Students With Disabilities: Legal Considerations in Identifying,Evaluating,and Providing Services
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2018
Mental Health Services,Free Appropriate Public Education,and Students With Disabilities: Legal Considerations in Identifying,Evaluating,and Providing Services
In the past few years, the provision of mental health services in public schools has received considerable attention. When students with disabilities are eligible for special education and related services under the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), mental health services are required if such services are needed to provide students with a free appropriate public education (FAPE). That is, when a student’s individualized education program (IEP) team determines that he or she needs mental health services to receive a FAPE, a school district is required to provide these services. Our purpose is to discuss when school district personnel should identify, evaluate, and serve students with disabilities who may have mental health needs.
BarrettS.EberL.WeistM. (2013). Advancing education effectiveness: Interconnecting school mental health and school-wide positive behavior support. Eugene, OR: Center for Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. Retrieved from http://www.pbis.org/common/cms/files/Current%20Topics/Final-Monograph.pdf
2.
BatemanB. D.LindenM. A. (2012). Better IEPs: How to develop legally correct and educationally useful programs. Verona, WI: Attainment Company.
3.
Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 (1982).
EberL.WeistM.BarrettS. (2013). An introduction to the interconnected systems framework. In BarrettS.WeistM.EberL., (Eds.), Advancing education effectiveness: Interconnecting school mental health and school-wide positive behavior support (pp. 1–17). Eugene, OR: Center for Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. Retrieved from http://www.pbis.org/common/cms/files/Current%20Topics/Final-Monograph.pdf
Forest Grove School District v. Student, 114 LRP 26109. (D., Oregon, 2014).
8.
FornessS. R.FreemanS. F. N.PaparellaT.KauffmanJ. M.WalkerH. M. (2012). Special education implications of point and cumulative prevalence for children with emotional or behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 20, 14–18.
9.
FornessS. R.KimJ.WalkerH. M. (2012). Prevalence of students with EBD: Impact on general education. Beyond Behavior, 21, 3–10.
10.
Fort Bend Independent School District v. Z.A., 62 IDELR 231 (S.D. TX. 2014).
11.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
12.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Act Regulations, 34 C.F.R. § 300 et seq.
13.
Jana K. v. Annville Cleona School District, 63 IDELR 278 (M.D. Pa. 2014).
14.
KazakA.HoagwoodK.WeiszJ.HoodK.KratochwillT.VargasL.. . .BanezG. (2010). A meta-systems approach to evidence-based practice for children and adolescents. American Psychologist, 65, 85–97. doi:10.1037/a0017784
15.
Kruelle v. New Castle County School District, 552 IDELR 350 (3rd Cir. 1981).
16.
MerikangasK. R.HeJ. P.BrodyD.FisherP. W.BourdonK.KoretzD. S. (2010). Prevalence and treatment of mental disorders among U.S. children in the 2001–2004 NHANES. Pediatrics, 125, 75–81.
17.
M.M. & I.F. on behalf of L.F. v. New York City Department of Education, 63 IDELR 156 (S.D. N.Y. 2014).
18.
Moore v. Hamilton Southeastern School District, 61 IDELR 283 (S.D. IN. 2013).
TatgenhorstA.NorlinJ. W.GornS. (2014). What do I do when . . . The answer book on special education law (6th ed.). Palm Beach Gardens, FL: LRP Publications.
