The purpose of the study was to investigate the leadership practices that elementary school administrators and leadership teams utilize to promote effective, successful, and sustainable schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS). The study focused on the practices, processes, and challenges that administrators and school leaders indicated led to the successful implementation of the SWPBIS framework. Twenty-four school leaders (six administrators; 18 leadership team members) from five elementary schools with platinum recognition for their high-quality SWPBIS implementation participated. School administrators participated in an in-person interview, and leadership team members participated in focus group interviews. Results revealed that successful SWPBIS framework implementation was promoted by establishing a distributed leadership approach that leveraged teachers as leaders while shaping their buildings’ systems of practices and processes, providing training and professional development to staff, establishing buy-in by stakeholders, and engaging stakeholders in their PBIS efforts.
AdamsD.SamatS. N. A.SamahH. A. (2018). Teacher leadership: Going beyond classroom. International Online Journal of Educational Leadership, 2(1), 1–3.
2.
AndreouT. E.McIntoshK.RossS. W.KahnJ. D. (2015). Critical incidents in sustaining school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports. The Journal of Special Education, 49(3), 157–167.
3.
BoudettK. P.CityE.MurnaneR. J. (2015). Data wise: A step-by-step guide to using assessment results to improve teaching and learning. Harvard Education Press.
4.
BradshawC. P.KothC. W.BevansK. B.IalongoN.LeafP. J. (2008). The impact of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS) on the organizational health of elementary schools. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(4), 462–473.
5.
ButterfieldL. D.MaglioA. S. T.BorgenW. A.AmundsonN. E. (2009). Using the enhanced critical incident technique in counselling psychology research. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 43(4), 265–282.
6.
EvanovichL. L.ScottT. M. (2016). Facilitating PBIS implementation: An administrator’s guide to presenting the logic and steps to faculty and staff. Beyond Behavior, 25(1), 4–8.
7.
FeuerbornL. L.TyreA. D.KingJ. P. (2015). The staff perceptions of behavior and discipline survey: A tool to help achieve systemic change through schoolwide positive behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17(2), 116–126.
GarbaczS. A.McIntoshK.EagleJ. W.Dowd-EagleS. E.HiranoK. A.RuppertT. (2016). Family engagement within schoolwide positive behavioral interventions and supports. Preventing School Failure, 60(1), 60–69.
10.
GastD. L.LedfordJ. (2012). Single subject research in behavioral sciences. Routledge.
11.
GlatthornA. A.JailallJ. M.JailallJ. K. (2009). The principal as curriculum leader: Shaping what is taught and tested. Corwin Press.
12.
GrayJ.KruseS.TarterC. J. (2016). Enabling school structures, collegial trust and academic emphasis: Antecedents of professional learning communities. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(6), 875–891.
13.
HelterbranV. R. (2010). Teacher leadership: Overcoming “I am just a teacher” syndrome. Education, 131(2), 363–371.
14.
HoltonJ. A. (2007). The coding process and its challenges. In BryantA.CharmazK. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of grounded theory (pp. 265–290). SAGE.
IngersollR. M.SirinidesP.DoughertyP. (2018). Leadership matters: Teachers’ roles in school decision making and school performance. American Educator, 42(1), 13–17, 39.
17.
MathewsS.McIntoshK.FrankJ. L.MayS. L. (2014). Critical features predicting sustained implementation of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 16(3), 168–178.
18.
MayrowetzD. (2008). Making sense of distributed leadership: Exploring the multiple usages of the concept in the field. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(3), 424–435.
19.
McIntoshK.KelmJ. L.Canizal DelabraA. (2016). In search of how principals change: A qualitative study of events that help and hinder administrator support for school-wide PBIS. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18(2), 100–110.
20.
McKevittB. C.BraaksmaA. D. (2008). Best practices in developing a positive behavior support system at the school level. Best Practices in School Psychology V, 44(3), 735–747.
21.
MendelsP. (2012). The effective principal. Journal of Staff Development, 33(1), 54–58. (Middle school level: An application of the Behavior Education Program. Education and Treatment of Children, 35(1), 51–90)
NeumerskiC. M. (2013). Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here?Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(2), 310–347.
24.
PinkelmanS. E.McIntoshK.RasplicaC. K.BergT.Strickland-CohenM. K. (2015). Perceived enablers and barriers related to sustainability of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports. Behavioral Disorders, 40(3), 171–183.
25.
RiceJ. K. (2010, April). Principal effectiveness and leadership in an era of accountability: What research says (Brief 8). National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED509682.pdf
SandomierskiT.KincaidD.AlgozzineB. (2007). Response to intervention and positive behavior support: Brothers from different mothers or sisters with different misters. Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Newsletter, 4(2), 1–4.
28.
WheelerJ. J.RicheyD. D. (2010). Behavior management: Principles and practices of positive behavior supports. Pearson.
29.
ZuckermanS. J.WilcoxK. C.DurandF. T.LawsonH. A.SchillerK. S. (2018). Drivers for change: A study of distributed leadership and performance adaptation during policy innovation implementation. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 17(4), 618–646.
