Students from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds have historically experienced poor outcomes related to academic achievement, special education, school discipline and climate, and juvenile justice. Differences between home and school cultures likely contribute to these outcomes. Evidence-based practices in schools are promoted to improve the academic and social outcomes for all students, but attention must be paid to cultural factors when implementing practices. School-wide positive behavior supports (SWPBS) is a systems approach to promoting evidence-based practices to affect important social and academic outcomes for all students. The purpose of this article is to consider culture within the implementation context of SWPBS. To achieve this purpose, we adopt and describe a contextual perspective on culture that is based on behavioral theory and principles of behavior analysis, and incorporate findings from a review of the literature related to culture and student behavior.
AlbertoP.TroutmanA. C. (2006). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
2.
ArtilesA.KozleskiE.TrentS.OsherD.OrtizA. (2010). Justifying and explaining disproportionality, 1968–2008: A critique of underlying views of culture. Exceptional Children, 76, 279–299.
3.
ArtilesA. J.TrentS. C. (1994). Overrepresentation of minority students in special education: A continuing debate. Journal of Special Education, 27(4), 410-437.
4.
BaerD. M.WolfM. M.RisleyT. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.
5.
BanksJ. A. (2007). Multicultural education: Characteristics and goals. In BanksJ. A.McGee BanksC. A. (Eds.), Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (6th ed., pp. 3–30). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
6.
BiglanA. (1995). Changing cultural practices: A contextualist framework for intervention research. Reno, NV: Context Press.
7.
BoasF. (1966). Race, language and culture. New York, NY: The Free Press.
8.
CahooneL. (1988). The dilemma of modernity: Philosophy, culture, and anti-culture. Albany: State University of New York Press.
9.
CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
10.
DelpitL. (2006). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom (2nd ed.). New York: The New Press.
11.
FallonL. M.O’KeeffeB. V.SugaiG. (2011). Consideration of culture and context in School-wide Positive Behavior Support: A review of current literature. Manuscript submitted for publication.
12.
FixsenD. L.NaoomS. F.BlaseK. A.FriedmanR. M.WallaceF. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network.
13.
GlennS. S. (2004). Individual behavior, culture, and social change. Behavior Analyst, 27(2), 133–151.
14.
GregoryA.WeinsteinR. (2008). The discipline gap and African Americans: Defiance or cooperation in the high school classroom. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 455–475.
15.
HayesS. C.Barnes-HolmesD.RocheB. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
16.
HayesS. C.FoxE.GiffordE. V.WilsonK. G.Barnes-HolmesD.HealyO. (2001). Derived relational responding as learned behavior. In HayesS. C.Barnes-HolmesD.RocheB. (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 21–49). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
17.
HayesS. C.ToarminoD. (1995). If behavioral principles are generally applicable, why is it necessary to understand cultural diversity?Behavior Therapist, 18, 21–23.
18.
HoffmanL.SableJ.NaumJ.GrayD. (2005). Public elementary and secondary students, staff, schools, and school districts: School year 2002–03 (NCES 2005–314). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
19.
HornerR. H.SugaiG.AndersonC. M. (2010). Examining the evidence base for school-wide positive behavior support. Focus on Exceptionality, 42(8), 1–14.
20.
HospJ. L.ReschlyD. J. (2003). Referral rates for intervention or assessment: A metaanalysis of racial differences. Journal of Special Education, 37(2), 67–80.
21.
HospJ. L.ReschlyD. J. (2002). Predictors of restrictiveness of placement for African-American and Caucasian students. Exceptional Children, 68(2), 225–238.
22.
JoyceB. R.ShowersB. (2002). Student achievement through staff development (3rd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
23.
KaufmanJ. S.JaserS. S.VaughanE. L.ReynoldsJ. S.Di DonatoJ.BernardS. N.. (2010). Patterns in office discipline referral data by grade, race/ethnicity, and gender. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 12, 44–54.
24.
KlingnerJ. K.ArtilesA. J.KozleskiE.HarryB.ZionS.TateW.. . . RileyD. (2005). Addressing the disproportionate representation of culturally and linguistically diverse students in special education through culturally responsive educational systems. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(38). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n38/.
25.
KrezmienM. P.LeoneP. E.AchillesG. M. (2006). Suspension, race, and disability: Analysis of statewide practices and reporting. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 217–226.
26.
LintonR. (1945). The cultural background of personality. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, Inc.
27.
National Research Council. (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education (Committee on Minority Representation in Special Education, DonovanM. S.CrossC. T., Eds.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education.
28.
ParsonsT. (1949). Essays in sociological theory. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
29.
PhinneyJ. A. (1990). Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: Review of research. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 499–514.
30.
PonterottoJ. G.UtseyS. O.PedersenP. B. (2006). Preventing prejudice: A guide for counselors, educators, and parents (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
PowellJ. A. (2008). Post-radicalism or targeted universalism. Denver University Law Review, 86(4), 785–806.
32.
Raffaele MendezL. M.KnoffH. M. (2003). Who gets suspended from school and why: A demographic analysis of schools and disciplinary infractions in a large school district. Education and Treatment of Children, 26(1), 30–51.
33.
RuddR.KirschI.YamamotoK. (2004). Literacy and health in America. Policy information report. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, Policy Information Center.
34.
ScottT.BarrettS. (2004). Using staff and student time engaged in disciplinary procedures to evaluate the impact of school wide PBS. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 21–27.
35.
SkibaR. J.MichaelR. S.NardoA. C.PetersonR. (2002). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in school punishment. Urban Review, 34, 317–342.
36.
SkinnerB. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
37.
SkinnerB. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Acton, MA: Copley Publishing Group.
38.
SkinnerB. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Knopf.
39.
SkinnerB. F. (1984). Selection by consequences. In SkinnerB. F.CataniaA. C.HarnadS. (Eds.), Canonical papers of B. F. Skinner. New York: Cambridge University Press.
40.
SnyderT. D.TanA. G.HoffmanC. M. (2006). Digest of education statistics, 2005. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
41.
SueD. W.ArredondoP.McDavisR. J. (1992). Multicultural counseling competencies and standards: A call to the profession. Journal of Counseling & Development, 70, 477–486.
42.
SueD. W.BernierY.DurranA.FeinbergL.PedersenP. B.SmithE. J.Vasquez-NuttalE. (1982). Position paper: Cross-cultural counseling competencies. The Counseling Psychologist, 10, 45–52.
43.
SugaiG.HornerR. H. (2002). The evolution of discipline practices: School-wide positive behavior supports. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 24, 23–50.
44.
SumA.KirschI.YamamotoK. (2004). Pathways to labor market success: The literacy proficiency of U.S. adults. Policy information report. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, Policy Information Center.
45.
Technical Assistance Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. (2010). Implementation blueprint and self-assessment: School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs.
VannemanA.HamiltonL.Baldwin AndersonJ.RahmanT. (2009). Achievement gaps: How Black and White students in public schools perform in mathematics and reading on the national assessment of educational progress (NCES 2009–455). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
49.
WoleryM.BaileyD. B.Jr.SugaiG. M. (1988). Effective teaching: Principles and procedures of applied behavior analysis with exceptional students. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
50.
ZehlerA.FleischmanH.HopstockP.StephensonT.PendzickM.SapruS. (2003). Policy report: Summary of findings related to LEP and SPED-LEP students. Report submitted to U.S. Department of Education, Office of English Language Acquisition, Language Enhancement, and Academic Achievement of Limited English Proficient Students. Arlington, VA: Development Associates.
