Applied behavior analysis (ABA) experts were surveyed to examine their perceptions of treatment acceptability of commonly used decelerative consequence-based behavioral procedures and the factors that have influenced shifts in these perceptions over time. These results were then compared with the perceptions of positive behavior supports (PBS) experts from an earlier study. Both similarities and disparities in perceptions across groups of experts are reported. Differences were noted in the overall acceptability and frequency of use of various consequence-based decelerative procedures, with ABA experts expressing greater willingness to consider their use than PBS experts. However, there were many similarities across both groups, including the decade in which shifts occurred in perceptions of treatment acceptability, the reasons these changes occurred, and the rationales used to justify the use or nonuse of certain consequence-based strategies. These data support earlier work that found that perceptions of treatment acceptability were not static but, rather, changed across time.
AAMR position statement on aversive procedures. (2005). Retrieved October 7, 2006, from http://www.aamr.org/Policies/aversive.shtml
2.
AAMR position statement on aversive therapy. (1987). Mental Retardation, 25, 118.
3.
ARC position statement on behavioral support. (2004). Retrieved October 7, 2006, from http://www.thearc.org/position-statements.htm
4.
Berkman, K.A., & Meyer, L.H. (1988). Alternative strategies and multiple outcomes in the remediation of severe self-injury: Going "all out" nonaversively. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 13, 76-86.
5.
Dunlap, G., Carr, E.G., Horner, R.H., Zarcone, J.R., & Schwartz, I. (in press). Positive behavior support and applied behavior analysis: A familial alliance. Behavior Modification.
6.
Evans, I.M., & Meyer, L.H. (1985). An educative approach to behavior problems. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
7.
Evans, I.M., Scotti, J.R., & Hawkins, R.P. (1999). Understanding where we are going by looking at where we have been. In J. R. Scotti & L. H. Meyer (Eds.), Behavioral intervention: Principles, models and practices (pp. 3-23). Baltimore : Paul H. Brookes.
8.
Favell, J. (2005, March). Keynote speech presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Positive Behavior Supports, Tampa, Florida.
9.
Guess, D., Helmstetter, E., Turnbull, H.R., & Knowlton, S. (1987). Use of aversive procedures with persons who are severely disabled: An historical review and critical analysis. TASH Monograph Series, 2.
10.
Hastings, R.P., & Noone, S.J. (2005). Self-injurious behavior and functional analysis: Ethics and evidence. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40, 335-342.
11.
Horner, R.H., Albin, R.W., Todd, A.W., & Sprague, J. (2006). Positive behavior support for individuals with severe disabilities. In M. E. Snell & F. Brown (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (6th ed., pp. 206-250). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/ Prentice Hall.
12.
Horner, R.H., Dunlap, G., Koegel, R.L., Carr, E., Sailor, W., Anderson, J., et al. (1990). Toward a technology of "nonaversive" behavioral support. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 15, 125-132.
13.
Johnston, J.M., Foxx, R.M., Jacobson, J.W., Green, G., & Mulick, M.A. (2006). Positive behavior support and applied behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 29, 51-74.
14.
Kahng, S., Iwata, B.A., & Lewin, A.B. (2002). Behavioral treatment of self-injury, 1965-2000 . American Journal on Mental Retardation, 107, 212-221.
15.
Keyes, J., Creekmore, W., Karst, R., Crow, R., & Dayan, M. (1988). The AAMR position statement on aversive therapy: The controversy. Mental Retardation, 26, 314-318.
16.
LaVigna, G.W., & Donnellan, A.M. (1986). Alternatives to punishment: Solving behavior problems with non-aversive strategies. New York: Irvington.
17.
Michaels, C.A., Brown, F., & Mirabella, N. (2005). Personal paradigm shifts in PBS experts: Perceptions of treatment acceptability of decelerative consequence-based behavioral procedures . Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7, 93-108.
18.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
19.
Miltenberger, R.G., Lennox, D.B., & Erfanian, N. (1989). Acceptability of alternative treatments for persons with mental retardation: Ratings from institutional and community-based staff . American Journal on Mental Retardation, 93, 388-395.
20.
Mudford, O.C. (1995). An intrusive and restrictive alternative to contingent shock. Behavioral Interventions, 10, 87-99.
21.
Mulick, J.A., & Butter, E. (2005). Positive behavior support: A paternalistic utopian delusion. In J. W. Jacobson, R. M. Foxx, & J. A. Mulick (Eds.), Controversial therapies for developmental disabilities: Fads, fashion, and science in professional practice (pp. 385-404). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
National Down Syndrome Society position statement on restraints, aversive interventions, and seclusion. (n.d.). Retrieved October 7, 2006, from http://www.ndss.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1115&Itemid=194
23.
Scotti, J.R., & Kennedy, C.H. (2000). Introduction to issues in the application of functional assessment. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 25, 195-196.
24.
Singer, G.H.S., Gert, B., & Koegel, R.L. (1999). A moral framework for analyzing the controversy over aversive behavioral interventions for people with severe mental retardation . Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1, 88-100.
25.
Smith, F.A., & Linscheid, T.R. (1994). Effect of parental acceptance or rejection of a proposed aversive intervention on treatment acceptability . American Journal on Mental Retardation, 99, 262-269.
26.
Spreat, S., & Walsh, D.E. (1994). Impact of treatment efficacy and professional affiliation on ratings of treatment acceptability. Mental Retardation, 32, 227-233.
27.
SPSS, Inc. (2001). SPSS for Windows (Version 11.5). Chicago: SPSS, Inc.
28.
SuperCool. (2004). SuperCool Random Number Generator (Version 1.04). Retrieved from http://www.supercoolbookmark.com/random/whatnewrandom.htm
29.
TASH resolution on positive behavior supports. (2000). Retrieved October 7, 2006, from http://tash.org/IRR/resolutions/res02behavior.htm
30.
Tesch, R. (1990). Qualitative research: Analysis types and software tools. New York: Falmer.
31.
Van Houten, R., Axelrod, S., Bailey, J.S., Favell, J.E., Foxx, R.M., Iwata, B.A., et al. (1988). The right to effective behavioral treatment . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 381-384.
