A growing body of research suggests that assigning preferred tasks or providing opportunities for choice among tasks can lead to reduced levels of problem behavior in individuals with developmental disabilities. The purpose of this article is to review the literature concerning the influence of preference and choice of activities on problem behavior. Possible mechanisms of action underlying the positive effects of preference and choice making are examined, and the usefulness of conducting a functional assessment prior to designing interventions involving such antecedent manipulations is discussed. Finally, important areas for future research are highlighted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bambara, L.M., Ager, C., & Koger, F. (1994). The effects of choice and task preference on the work performance of adults with severe disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 555-556.
2.
Bambara, L.M., Koger, F., Katzer, T., & Davenport, T.A. (1995). Embedding choice in the context of daily routines: An experimental case study. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 20, 185-195.
3.
Berkman, K.A., & Meyer, L.H. (1988). Alternative strategies and multiple outcomes in the remediation of severe self-injury: Going "all out" nonaversively. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, 76-86.
4.
Berotti, D. (1996). Effects of preference and choice on problem behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York, Albany
5.
Carr, E.G., & Carlson, J.I. (1993). Reduction of severe behavior problems in the community using a multicomponent treatment approach. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 157-172.
6.
Clarke, S., Dunlap, G., Foster-Johnson, L., Childs, K.E., Wilson, D., White, R., & Verra, A. (1995). Improving the conduct of students with behavioral disorders by incorporating student interests into curricular activities. Behavioral Disorders, 20, 221-237.
7.
Cole, C.L., Davenport, T.A., Bambara, L.M., & Ager, C.L. (1997). Effects of choice and task preference on the work performance of students with behavior problems. Behavioral Disorders, 22, 65-74.
8.
Cooper, L.J., Wacker, D.P., Thursby, D., Plagmann, L.A., Harding, J., Millard, T., & Derby, M. (1992). Analysis of the effects of task preferences, task demands, and adult attention on child behavior in outpatient and classroom settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 823-840.
9.
Cosden, M., Gannon, C., & Haring, T.G. (1995). Teacher-control versus student-control over choice of task and reinforcement for students with severe behavior problems. Journal of BehavioralEducation, 5, 11-27.
10.
Dattilo, J., & Rusch, F.R. (1985). Effects of choice on leisure participation for person with severe handicaps. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 10, 194-199.
11.
Dunlap, G., dePerczel, M., Clarke, S., Wilson, D., Wright, S., White, R., & Gomez, A. (1994). Choice making to promote adaptive behavior for students with emotional and behavioral challenges. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 505-518.
12.
Dunlap, G., Foster-Johnson, L., Clarke, S., Kern, L., & Childs, K.E. (1995). Modifying activities to produce functional outcomes: Effects on the problem behaviors of students with disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 20, 248-258.
13.
Dunlap, G., Kern, L., dePerczel, M., Clarke, S., Wilson, D., Childs, K.E., White, R., & Falk, G.D. (1993). Functional analysis of classroom variables for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 18, 275-291.
14.
Dunlap, G., Kern-Dunlap, L., Clarke, S., & Robbins, F.R. (1991). Functional assessment, curricular revision, and severe behavior problems. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 24, 387-397.
15.
Dunlap, G., Robbins, F.R., & Kern, L. (1994). Some characteristics of nonaversive intervention for severe behavior problems. In E. Schopler & G. B. Mesibov (Eds.), Behavioral issues in autism (pp. 227-245). New York: Plenum.
16.
Dyer, K., Dunlap, G., & Winterling, V. (1990). Effects of choice making on the serious problem behaviors of students with severe handicaps. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 515-524.
17.
Fisher, W.W., Thompson, R.H., Piazza, C.C., Crosland, K., & Gotjen, D. (1997). On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 423-438.
18.
Foster-Johnson, L., Ferro, J., & Dunlap, G. (1994). Preferred curricular activities and reduced problem behaviors in students with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 493-504.
19.
Golonka, Z., Wacker, D., Berg, W., Derby, K.M., Harding, J., & Peck, S. (2000). Effects of escape to alone versus escape to enriched environments on adaptive and aberrant behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 243-246.
20.
Graff, R.B., Libby, M.E., & Green, G. (1998). The effects of reinforcer choice on rates of challenging behavior and free operant responding in individuals with severe disabilities . Behavioral Interventions, 13, 249-268.
21.
Harchik, A.E., Sherman, J.A., Sheldon, J.B., & Bannerman, D.J. (1993). Choice and control: New opportunities for people with developmental disabilities. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, 5, 151-161.
22.
Horner, R.H., Day, H.M., Sprague, J.R., O'Brien, M., & Heathfield, L.T. (1991). Interspersed requests: A nonaversive procedure for reducing aggression and self-injury during instruction . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 265-278.
23.
Kearney, C.A., Bergan, K.P., & McKnight, T.J. (1998). Choice availability and persons with mental retardation: A longitudinal and regression analysis. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 10, 291-305.
24.
Kearney, C.A., & McKnight, T.J. (1997). Preference, choice, and persons with disabilities: A synopsis of assessments, interventions and future directions. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 217-238.
25.
Kennedy, C.H., & Haring, T.G. (1993). Teaching choice making during social interactions to students with profound multiple disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 63-76.
26.
Koegel, R.L., Dyer, K., & Bell, L.K. (1987). The influence of child-preferred activities on autistic children's social behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 243-252.
27.
Meyer, L.H., & Evans, I.M. (1989). Nonaversive intervention for behavior problems: A manual for home and community. Baltimore: Brookes.
28.
Mithaug, D.E., & Hanawalt, D.A. (1978). The validation of procedures to assess prevocational task preferences in retarded adults. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 153-162.
29.
Mithaug, D.E., & Mar, D.K. (1980). The relation between choosing and working prevocational tasks in two severely retarded young adults. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 239-245.
30.
Moes, D.R. (1998). Integrating choice-making opportunities within teacher-assigned academic tasks to facilitate the performance of children with autism. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23, 319-328.
31.
Owen, M.S., & Symons, F.J. (1993). Normalization, habilitation, and personal choice for persons with developmental disabilities. Developmental DisabilitiesBulletin, 21, 13-20.
32.
Parsons, M.B., Reid, D.H., Reynolds, J., & Bumgarner, M. (1990). Effects of chosen versus assigned jobs on the work performance of persons with severe handicaps. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 253-258.
33.
Powell, S., & Nelson, B. (1997). Effects of choosing academic assignments on a student with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 181-183.
34.
Roane, H.S., Vollmer, T.R., Ringdahl, J.E., & Marcus, B.A. (1998). Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 605-620.
35.
Seybert, S., Dunlap, G., & Ferro, J. (1996). The effects of choice-making on the problem behaviors of high school students with intellectual disabilities. Journal of BehavioralEducation, 6, 49-65.
36.
Shevin, M., & Klein, S.K. (1984). The importance of choice-making skills for students with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 9, 159-166.
37.
Sigafoos, J. (1998). Choice making and personal selection strategies . In J. K. Luiselli & M. J. Cameron (Eds.), Antecedent control: Innovative approaches to behavioral support (pp. 187-221). Baltimore: Brookes.
38.
Umbreit, J., & Blair, K.S. (1996). The effects of preference, choice and attention on problem behaviors at school. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 151-161.
39.
Vaughn, B.J., & Horner, R.H. (1997). Identifying instructional tasks that occasion problem behaviors and assessing the effects of student versus teacher choice among these tasks. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 299-312.
40.
Weeks, M., & Gaylord-Ross, R. (1981). Task difficulty and aberrant behavior in severely handicapped students. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 449-463.
41.
Winterling, V., Dunlap, G., & O'Neill, R.E. (1987). The influence of task variation on the aberrant behavior of autistic students. Education and Treatment of Children, 10, 105-119.
