A voluntary system for credentialing evaluators is described. I examine the urgent need for such a system in the field of evaluation, as well as various concerns regarding credentialing. The paper also includes an unabridged and adapted version of a table that was used in a debate on certification at the 1998 annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association in Chicago. The table is helpful in understanding both the pro and con sides of the credentialing issue.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Altschuld, J. W. (1999). The certification of evaluators: Highlights from a report submitted to the Board of Directors of the American Evaluation Association. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 481-493.
2.
Altschuld, J. W., Engle, M., Cullen, C., Kim, I., & Macce, B. R. (1994). The 1994 directory of evaluation training programs. In J. W. Altschuld & M. Engle (Eds.), The preparation of professional evaluators: issues, perspectives and programs. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 62, 71-94. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
Association of Government Accountants. (1997, May/June). Topics, 36,1.
4.
Long, B., & Kishchuk, N. (1997). Professional certification: A report for the National Council of the Canadian Evaluation Society on the experience of other organizations. Canadian Evaluation Society.
5.
Louisiana State Department of Education. (1996). Certification criteria for education program evaluators. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State Department of Education.
6.
Love, A. (1994). Should evaluators be certified? In J. W. Altschuld & M. Engle (Eds.), The preparation of professional evaluators: Issues, perspectives and programs. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 62, 29-40. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Morris, M. (1994). The role of single evaluation courses in evaluation training. In J. W. Altschuld & M. Engle (Eds.), The preparation of professional evaluators: Issues, perspectives and programs. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 62, 51-60. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
Rossi, P. H., Freeman, H. E., & Lipsey, M. W. (1998). Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Scriven, M. (1994). The final synthesis. Evaluation Practice, 15, 367-382.
10.
Shadish, W. R. Jr., Cook, T. D., & Leviton, L. C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage.
11.
Smith, M. (1999). The evaluators’ institute: The 1999 program. McLean, VA: The Evaluators’ Institute, Conwal Incorporated.
12.
Triplett, S. E. (1982). Implementation of the certification of Louisiana educational evaluators using the Joint Committee Standards. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, New York.
13.
Worthen, B. R., & Altschuld, J. W. (Organizers) (1998). A soft debate about the proposition: Be it resolved that the field of evaluation should undertake a system to certify (or credential) evaluators. Debate presented at the annual meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Chicago.
14.
Worthen, B. R., Sanders, J. R., & Fitzpatrick, J. L. (1997). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. White Plains, NY: Addison, Wesley, Longman, Inc.
