Letters should discuss issues/problems of general interest to practicing evaluators. Responses to specific material published in EP will be published in the section titled In Response. Other comments, thoughts, and viewpoints about evaluation or about EP will be included here in Letters. Contributions should not usually exceed two pages; writers of longer epistles should consider the section titled Forum.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Lambur, M. (1994). Project higher ground: An evaluative framework for ending extension programs and activitiesBlacksburg, VA: Virginia Cooperative Extension, VPI&SU.
2.
Mayeske, G. (1994). Life cycle program management & evaluation: An heuristic approachWashington, DC: Extension Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
3.
Scriven, M. (1993). Hard-won lessons in program evaluation. New Directions in Program Evaluation (No. 58), Summer. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4.
Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus (4th Edition). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
