Becker, H. (1978). Do photographs tell the truth?Afterimage, 5, 9-13.
2.
Borland, R., & Theobald, T. (1990). A picture of sun protection behaviorCancer Forum, 14, 171-174.
3.
Brown, R.D., Petersen, C.H., & Sanstead, M. (1980). Photographic evaluation: The use of the camera as an evaluation tool for student affairsJournal of College Student Personnel, 558-563.
4.
D'Amico, A. (1986). This could be meGrassroots Development, 10, 1, 38-47.
5.
Dowdall, G.W., & Golden, J. (1989). Photographs as data: An analysis of images from a mental hospitalQualitative Sociology , 19(9), 183-207.
6.
English, F.W. (1988, May) The utility of the camera in qualitative inquiryEducational Researcher, 8-15.
7.
Fang, W.L. (1985) Using photographs in an evaluation reportEvaluation News, 6(2), 24-27.
Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2ndEd.), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10.
Reichardt, C. S., & Rallis, S. F. (Eds.). (1994). The qualitative-quantitative debate: New perspectives. New Directions for Program Evaluation (No. 61)San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Ruby, J. (1976). In a pic's eye: Interpretive strategies for deriving significance and meaning from photographsAfterimage3, 5-7.
12.
Templin, P. (1978). Still photography: Can it provide program portrayal? Centre for Instructional Research and Curriculum Evaluation, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL.
13.
Tucker, S.A., & Dempsey, J.V. (1991). Photo-interviewing: A tool for evaluating technological innovationsEvaluation Review, 15(5), 639-654.
14.
Wachtman, E.L. (1978, March). The camera as an evaluation and research instrument: Snapshots of a science curriculumPaper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association