Bentler, P.M., & Woodward, J.A. (1978). A head start re-evaluation: Positive effects are not yet demonstrable. Evaluation Quarterly , 2, 493-510.
2.
Brewer, M.B., Campbell, D.T., & Crano, W.D. (1970). Testing a single-factor model as an alternative to the misuse of partial correlations in hypothesis-testing research. Sociometry, 33(1), 1-11.
3.
Campbell, D.T. (1957). Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297-312. (Reprinted in Campbell, D. T. (1988a). Methodology and epistemology for social science. E. S. Overman (Ed.) (pp. 151-166). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.)
4.
Campbell, D.T. (1969). Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, 24(4), 409-429. (Reprinted in Campbell, D.T. (1988a). Methodology and epistemology for social science. E. S. Overman (Ed.) (pp. 261-289). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Campbell, D.T. (1975a). Assessing the impact of planned social change . In G. M. Lyons (Ed.), Social research and public policies. Hanover, NH: The Public Affairs Center, Dartmouth College, 3-45. (Reprinted in Evaluation and Program Planning, 1979, 2, 67-90.)
6.
Campbell, D.T. (1975b). 'Degrees of freedom' and the case study. Comparative Political Studies, 8(2), 178-193. (Reprinted in Campbell , D.T. (1988a). Methodology and epistemology for social science. E. S. Overman (Ed.) (pp. 377-388). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.)
7.
Campbell, D.T. (1976). Focal local indicators for social program evaluation . Social Indicators Research, 3, 237-256.
8.
Campbell, D.T. (1978). Qualitative knowing in action research. In M. Brenner, P. Marsh, & M. Brenner (Eds.), The social contexts of method (pp. 184-209). London, UK: Croom Helm. (Reprinted in Campbell, D.T. (1988a). Methodology and epistemology for social science. E. S. Overman (Ed.) (pp. 360-376). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.)
9.
Campbell, D.T. (1984). Can we be scientific in applied social science ? In R. F. Conner, D. G. Altman, & C. Jackson (Eds.), Evaluation Studies Review Annual, 9, 26-48. (Reprinted in Campbell, D.T. (1988a). Methodology and epistemology for social science. E. S. Overman (Ed.) (pp. 315-333). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.)
10.
Campbell, D.T. (1986). Science's social system of validity-enhancing collective belief change and the problems of the social sciences In D. W. Fiske & R. A. Shweder (Eds.), Metatheory in social science: Pluralisms and subjectivities (pp. 108-135). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Reprinted in Campbell, D.T. (1988a). Methodology and epistemology for social science. E. S. Overman (Ed.) (pp. 504-523). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.)
11.
Campbell, D.T. (1987). Guidelines for monitoring the scientific competence of preventive intervention research centers: An exercise in the sociology of scientific validity. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization , 8(3), 389-430.
12.
Campbell, D.T. (1988a). Methodology and epistemology for social science . E. S. Overman (Ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Campbell, D.T. (1988b). The experimenting society. In Campbell, D. T. (1988a). Methodology and epistemology for social science. E. S. Overman (Ed.) (pp. 290-314). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
14.
Campbell, D.T. (1988c). Systems theory and social experimentation. The U. S. S. R. Academy of Sciences, Institute for Systems Studies, Moscow, Conference on Systems Theory and Management. (Organized by Professors V. N. Sadovsky, V. S. Rapoport, and S. A. Umpleby.)
15.
Campbell, D.T. (1991a). Coherentist empiricism, hermeneutics, and the commensurability of paradigms. International Journal of Educational Research, 15(6), 587-597.
16.
Campbell, D.T. (1991b). Methods for the experimenting society. Evaluation Practice, 12(3), 223-260.
17.
Campbell, D.T. (1991c). Quasi-experimental research designs in compensatory education. Duplicated paper for the O. E. C. D. Conference on Evaluating Intervention Strategies for Children and Youth at Risk. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Budget, and Evaluation.
18.
Campbell, D.T. (1994a). The social psychology of scientific validity: An epistemological perspective and a personalized history. In W. R. Shadish & S. Fuller (Eds.), The social psychology of science (pp. 124-161). New York: Guilford Press.
19.
Campbell, D.T. (1994b). How individual and face-to-face-group selection undermine firm selection in organizational evolution. In J. A. C. Baum & J. V. Singh, (Eds.), Evolutionary dynamics of organizations (pp. 23-38). New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
Campbell, D.T. (in press). The non-foundational, hermeneutic, coherentist epistemology exemplified in the works of Donald W. Fiske. In P. E. Shrout & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Advances in personality research, methods and theory: Afestschrift honoring Donald W. Fiske. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21.
Campbell, D.T., & Boruch, R.F. (1975). Making the case for randomized assignment to treatments by considering the alternatives: Six ways in which quasi-experimental evaluations in compensatory education tend to underestimate effects. In C. A. Bennett & A. Lumsdaine (Eds.), Evaluation and experiment: Some critical issues in assessing social programs (pp. 195-296). New York: Academic Press.
22.
Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81-105. (Reprinted in Campbell, D.T. (1988a). Methodology and epistemology for social science . E. S. Overman (Ed.) (pp. 37-61). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.)
23.
Campbell, D.T., & Krauss, B. (1991). Speculations on quasi-experimental designs for AIDS research. Duplicated paper for the July 1991Rockville, MDConference on AIDS Survey Research Methodology, Ronald Kessler, organizer.
24.
Campbell, D.T., & Paller, B.T. (1989). Extending evolutionary epistemology to 'justifying'scientific beliefs: A sociological rapprochement with a fallibilist perceptual foundationalism? In K. Hahlweg & C. A. Hooker (Eds.), Issues in evolutionary epistemology (pp. 231-257). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
25.
Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 171-246). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. (Reprinted as Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.)
26.
Cohen, P., Cohen, J., Teresi, J., Marchi, M., & Velez, C.N. (1990). Problems in the measurement of latent variables in structural equations causal models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14(2), 183-196.
27.
Cook, T.D., & Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis for field settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
28.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
29.
Ginsberg, P.E. (1984). The dysfunctional side-effects of quantitative indicator production: Illustrations from mental health care (A message from Chicken Little). Evaluation and Program Planning, 7, 1-12.
30.
Kenny, D.A. (1975). A quasi-experimental approach to assessing treatment effects in the nonequivalent control group design. Psychological Bulletin,82, 345-362.
31.
Kenny, D.A. (1979). Correlation and causality. New York: Wiley.
32.
Magidson, J. (1977). Toward a causal model approach for adjusting for pre-existing differences in the nonequivalent control group situation: A general alternative to ANCOVA. Evaluation Quarterly, 1, 399-420.
33.
Ravetz, J. (1971). Scientific knowledge and its social problems. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
34.
Suchman, E. (1967). Evaluation research. New York : Russell Sage Foundation.
35.
Wu, P. (1991). Structural equation models in the analysis of data from a nonequivalent group design: A reanalysis of the Westinghouse Head Start evaluation. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Lehigh University.