Clarifying and Expanding the Application of Program Theory-driven Evaluations

Bickman, L. (Ed.) (1987). Using program theory in evaluation. New directions for program evaluation. No. 33 . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .

Bickman, L. (Ed.) (1990). Advances in program theory. New directions for program evaluation. No. 47. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Chen, H.-T. (1989a). The theory-driven perspective. In H.-T. Chen (Ed.), Evaluation and program planning , 12(4) [Special issue].

Chen, H.-T. (1989b). The conceptual framework of the theory-driven perspective. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(4), 391-396.

Chen, H.-T. (1990). Theory-driven evaluations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Chen, H.-T. , & Rossi, P.H. (1989). Issues in the theory-driven perspective. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(4), 299-306.

Cordray, D.S. (1989). Optimizing validity in program evaluation: An elaboration of Chen and Rossi's theory-driven approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(4), 379-385.

Farrar, E. , & House, E.R. (1986). The evaluation of Push/ Excel: A case study. In E. R. House (Ed.) New directions in educational evaluation (pp. 158-185). Philadelphia, PA: Falmer.

Patton, M.Q. (1989). A context and boundaries for a theory-driven approach to validity. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(4), 375-377.

Scott, A.G. , & Sechrest, L. (1989). Strength of theory and theory of strength. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(4), 329-336.

Scriven, M. (1991). Beyond formative and summative evaluation. In M. W. McLaughlin , & D. C. Phillips (Eds.), Evaluation and education: At quarter century (pp. 19-64). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Smith, N.L. (1987). Toward the justification of claims in evaluation research. Evaluation and Program Planning, 10, 309-314.

Smith, N.L. (1990). Using path analysis to develop and evaluate program theory and impact. In L. Bickman (Ed.) Advances in program theory (pp. 53-57). New Directions for Program Evaluation. No. 47. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Smith, N.L. (1992a). Aspects of investigative inquiry in evaluation . In N. L. Smith (Ed.) Varieties of investigative evaluation (pp. 3-13). New Directions for Program Evaluation. No. 56. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Smith, N. L. (Ed.) (1992b). Varieties of investigative evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation. No. 56. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .

Smith, N.L. , & Mukherjee, P. (in press). Classifying research questions addressed in published evaluation studies. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. Forthcoming.

Stake, R.E. (1991). Retrospective on "The countenance of educational evaluation". In M. W. McLaughlin & D. C. Phillips (Eds.) Evaluation and education: At quarter century (pp. 67-88). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Stake, R.E. (1986). Quieting reform. Urbana, IL : University of Illinois Press.

Trochim, W.M.K. (1989). Pattern matching and program theory. Evaluation and Program Planning, 12(4), 355-366.