Essays, opinions, and professional judgments are welcome in this section of EP.Forumarticles speak to and about the philosophical and ethical dilemmas of our profession. Authors are invited to express their views to encourage constructive dialogue centered on issues. To keep the dialogue substantive, other articles moti vated by previousForumpresentations should have independent titles and themes. Items labeled "Comments on ... " and "Rejoinder to... " will not be published inForum—such responses, and those not of article length or nature, are welcome and encouraged in the In Response section of EP. Standard citations and reference lists should acknowledge and identify earlier contributions and viewpoints. Manuscripts should not exceed 10 double-spaced typewritten pages in length.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Hendricks, M. (1984). Finis. Evaluation News, 5(4), 94-96.
2.
Hendricks, M. & Handley, E.A. (1990). Improving the recommendations from evaluation studies. Evaluation and Program Planning, 13, 109-117.
3.
Hendricks, M. & Papagiannis, M. (1990). Do's and dont's for offering effective recommendations. Evaluation Practice, 11(2), 121-125.
4.
McKillip, J. ( 1989). Need Analysis: Tools for the Human Services and Education. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
5.
Office of Evaluation and Inspections. (1990 ). Technical assistance guides for conducting program evaluations and inspections. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
