Articles should deal with topics applicable to the broad field of program evaluation. Implications for practicing evaluators should be clearly identified. Examples of contributions include but are not limited to reviews of new developments in evaluation and descriptions of a current evaluation effort, research problem, or technique. Manuscripts should include appropriate references and not exceed 10 double- spaced typewritten pages in length.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brown, L. (1988). Group Self-evaluation. Melbourne , Victoria: Ministry of Education .
2.
Carr, W., and Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research. London: Falmer.
3.
Kemmis, S. (1986, July). Self-evaluation in the context of program evaluation. Paper presented to the Annual Conference of the National Evaluation Association, Sydney.
4.
Kemmis, S. (1987, July). Technology and bureaucracy in evaluation: Critical alternatives. Paper presented at the National Conference of the Australasian Evaluation Society, Canberra , Australian Capital Territory.
5.
Kemmis, S., and McTaggart, R. (Eds.) (1988a). The Action Research Planner (3rd ed.). Geelong, Victoria : Deakin University Press.
6.
Kemmis, S., and McTaggart, R. (Eds.) (1988b). The Action Research Reader (3rd ed.). Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
7.
Kemmis, S. and Robottom, I. (1986). Principles of procedure in curriculum evaluation . Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18(2), 151-155.
8.
MacDonald, B. (1976). Evaluation and the control of education. In D.A. Tawney (ed.) Curriculum Evaluation Today: Trends and Implications. London: MacMillan (Schools Council Research Studies).
9.
MacDonald, B. (1978a). Accountability, standards and the process of schooling. Paper commissioned by the Educational Research Board of the Social Science Research Council, reproduced in T. Becher and S. Maclure (Eds.). Accountability in education (pp. 127-151). Windsor: National Foundation for Educational Research.
10.
MacDonald, B. (1978b). Democracy and Evaluation. Norwich: Centre for Applied Research in Education, University of East Anglia.
McTaggart, R. (1989). Bureaucratic rationality and the self-educating profession: The problem of teacher privatism. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21(4), 345-361.
13.
Simons, H. (1987). Getting to Know Schools in a Democracy: The Politics and Process of Evaluation. London: Falmer.
14.
Stake, R.E. (1975). To evaluate an arts program. In R.E. Stake (Ed.),Evaluating arts education: A responsive approach. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
