Berk, R., Boruch, R., Chambers, D., Rossi P., & Witte, A. (1985). Social policy experimentation: a position paper . Evaluation Review, 9(4), 387-429.
2.
Boruch, R., Cordray, D., Pior, G., & Leviton, L. (1983). Recommendations to Congress and their rationale . Evaluation Review,7(1), 5-35.
3.
Cook, T., & Campbell, D. (1979). Quasi-experimentation. Chicago : Rand McNally.
4.
Crane, J. (1988). Evaluation as scientific research. Evaluation Review, 12(5), 467-482.
5.
DeYoung, D., & Conner, R. (1982). Evaluator preconceptions about organizational decision making. Evaluation Review, 6(3), 431-440.
6.
Green, L., & Lewis, F. (1986). Measurement and evaluation in health education and health promotion. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield.
7.
Hennessy, M. (1982). The end of methodology? A review essay on evaluation research methods. Western Political Quarterly, 35(4), 606-612.
8.
Kennedy, M. (1983). The role of the in-house evaluator. Evaluation Review, 7(4), 519-541.
9.
Lipsey, M. (1988). Practice and malpractice in evaluation research . Evaluation Practice, 9(4), 5-24.
10.
March, J. & Olsen, J. (1976). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen: Universitels Forlaget.
11.
Martin, J. (1982). A garbage can model of the research process. In J. McGrath, J. Martin, & R. Kulka (Eds.), Judgment calls in research (pp. 17-39). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12.
Peck, D., & Rubin, H. (1983). Bureaucratic needs and evaluation research. Evaluation Review, 7(5), 685-703.
13.
Rossi, P., & Freeman, H. (1982). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
Shadish, W., & Epstein, R. (1987). Patterns of program evaluation among members of the Evaluation Research Society and Evaluation Network. Evaluation Review, 11 (5), 555-590.
15.
Sherrill, S. (1984). Toward a coherent view of evaluation. Evaluation Review, 8(4), 443-466.
16.
Wye, C. ( 1989). Increasing client involvement in evaluation: A team approach . In G. Barkdoll & J. Bell (Eds.), Evaluation and the federal decision maker. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
