A. D. Revill Associates. (1985). A report on the evaluation of the Energuide Program, part II (technical). In Consumer and Corporate Affairs Canada (Ed.), Energuide Evaluation: Background study modules. Ottawa: Consumer and Corporate Affairs Canada.
2.
Canada, Department of Consumer and Corporate Affairs. (1985). Energuide evaluation. Ottawa : Department of Consumer and Corporate Affairs.
3.
Canada Market Research, Ltd. (1985). Review of consumer perception study. In Consumer and Corporate Affairs Canada (Ed.), Energuide evaluation: Background study modules. Ottawa: Consumer and Corporate Affairs Canada.
4.
Canada, Office of the Comptroller General. ( 1981). Guide on the program evaluation function. Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada.
Canadian Energy Research Institute. (1985). Review of evaluation modules. In Consumer and Corporate Affairs Canada (Ed.), Energuide evaluation: Background study modules. Ottawa: Consumer and Corporate Affairs.
7.
Canadian Facts, Ltd. (1985). The Energuide Program—Survey of consumers and salespersons. In Consumer and Corporate Affairs Canada (Ed.), Energuide evaluation: Background study modules. Ottawa: Consumer and Corporate Affairs Canada.
8.
Chen, H.T., & Rossi, P.H. (1983). Evaluating with sense: The theory-driven approach . Evaluation Review, 7, 283-302.
9.
Cook, T.D., & Reichardt, C.S. (1979). Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10.
Datta, L., & Perloff, R. (1979). Improving evaluations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11.
Drapkin, R. (1981). Energy analysis of major household appliances . Montreal: Canadian Electrical Association.
12.
Glass, G.V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M.L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13.
Hausman, J.A., & Joskow, P.L. (1981). Studies in energy and the American economy: Evaluating the cost and benefits of appliance efficiency standards. Discussion Paper No. 13, MIT-EL82-005 WP. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
14.
Hedrick, T.E., Boruch, R.F., & Ross, J. (1978). On ensuring the availability of evaluative data for secondary analysis. Policy Sciences, 9, 259-280.
15.
Hushion Patterson Milligan & Co. (1985 ). Energuide evaluation: Legislative issues. In Consumer and Corporate Affairs Canada (Ed.), Energuide Evaluation: Background study modules. Ottawa : Consumer and Corporate Affairs Canada.
16.
Marbek Resource Consultants, LTD. (1985). Evaluation of the Energuide Program, part II (analytical module). In Consumer and Corporate Affairs Canada (Ed.), Energuide evaluation: Background study modules. Ottawa: Consumer and Corporate Affairs Canada.
17.
Market Facts. (1979). Baseline study of impact of energy labeling program for major home appliances . Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission.
18.
Mishan, E.J. (1972). Cost-benefit analysis. London : Allen & Unwin.
19.
Nagel, S. (1983). Nonmonetary variables in benefit-cost evaluation . Evaluation Review, 7, 37-64.
20.
Office of Technology Assessment. (1979). Residential energy conservation. Washington, DC : Government Printing Office.
21.
Ontario Hydro. (1981). Energy analysis of major household appliances. Toronto: Economics Division, Ontario Hydro.
22.
Patton, M.Q. (1978). Utilization-focused evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
23.
Peat Marwick and Partners. (1985). Benefit-cost study of the Energuide Program. In Consumer and Corporate Affairs Canada (Ed.), Energuide evaluation: Background study modules. Ottawa: Consumer and Corporate Affairs Canada.
24.
Peters, T.J., & Waterman, R.H. , Jr. (1982). In search ofexcellence . New York: Harper & Row.
25.
Pillemer, D.B., & Light, R.J. (1980). Synthesizing outcomes: How to use research from many studies. Harvard Educational Review, 50, 175-195.
26.
Polard, E., Cooper, A.C., & Griffen, D.H. (1985). Documentation in evaluation research: Managerial and scientific requirements. Evaluation and Program Planning , 8, 161-169.
27.
Rossi, P.R., Freeman, H.E., & Wright, S.R. (1979). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28.
Rutman, L. (1980). Planning useful evaluations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29.
Scherill, S. (1984). Toward a coherent view of evaluation. Evaluation Review, 8, 443-466.
30.
Science Applications International. (1984). A preliminary assessment of DOE's appliance labeling consumer education program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy.
31.
Soderstrom, J., Berry, L., & Hirst, E. (1981). The use of meta-evaluation to plan evaluations of conservation programs. Evaluation and Program Planning , 4, 113-122.
