Arabian, J.M. (1984). Conversion tables for estimating AFQT percentile distributions from aptitude area standard score distributions. (U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Working Paper RS-WP-84-19) .
2.
Booth-Kewley, (1983). Predictive validation of Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery forms, 8, 9, and 10 against performance at 47 Navy schools. San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
3.
Maier, M.H., & Truss, A.R. (1983). Validity of the ASVAB forms 8, 9 and 10 for Marine Corps training courses: Subtests and current composites. (Memorandum No. 83-3107) . Alexandria, VA: Center for Naval Analysis.
4.
Richards, J.D., Taylor, J.A., Williams, T.J., & Muraida, D.J. (1983a). Surveying supervisors of recent graduates of the Academy of Health Sciences, U.S. Army. Evaluation News , 4(2), 65-66.
5.
Richards, J.D., Taylor, J.A., Williams, T.J., & Dunn, P.F. (1983b). Summative evaluation of the Academy of Health Sciences training products and programs. Evaluation News, 4(4), 54-56.
6.
Rossmeissl, P.G., Martin, C.J., & Wing, H. (1983). Validity of ASVAB forms 8, 9, and 10 as predictors of training success. (Selection and Classification Working Paper No. 83-3) . Alexandria, VA: Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
7.
Wilbourn, J.M., Valentine, L.D., & Ree, M.J. (1984) Relationships of the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) forms 8, 9 and 10 to Air Force technical school final grades (AFHRL-TP-84-08). Brooks Air Force Base, TX: Air Force Human Resources Laboratory.
