BoruchR. (2007). Encouraging the flight of error: Ethical standards, evidence standards, and randomized trials. New Directions for Evaluation, 113, 55–73.
2.
BoruchR.RubyA. (2015). To flop is human: Inventing better scientific approaches to anticipating failure. In ScottR.KosslynS. (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 1–15). John Wiley & Sons.
3.
CaldwellL. D.BledsoeK. L. (2019). Can social justice live in a house of structural racism? A question for the field of evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 40(1), 6–18.
4.
ChelimskyE. (2007). Factors influencing the choice of methods in federal evaluation practice. New Directions for Evaluation, 113, 13–33.
5.
ChouinardJ. A.CramF. (2019). Culturally responsive approaches to evaluation: Empirical implications for theory and practice. Sage.
6.
CronbachL. J. (1986). Social inquiry by and for Earthlings. In FiskeD. W.ShwederR. A. (Eds.), Metatheory in social science: Pluralisms and subjectivities (pp. 93–107). The University of Chicago Press.
7.
DattaL.-e. (1994). Paradigm wars: A basis for peaceful coexistence and beyond. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 61, 53–70.
8.
DattaL.-e. (2007). Looking at the evidence: What variations in practice might indicate. New Directions for Evaluation, 113, 35–54.
9.
DawidA. P. (2000). Causal inference without counterfactuals. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 407–424.
10.
FettermanD. M. (1992). In response to Lee Sechrest’s 1991 AEA presidential address: “Roots: Back to our first generations,” February 1991, 1–7. Evaluation Practice, 13, 171–172.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (1989). Fourth-generation evaluation. Sage.
13.
JulnesG.RogD. J. (2007a). Current federal policies and controversies over methodology in evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 113, 1–12.
14.
JulnesG.RogD. J. (2007b). Informing federal policies on evaluation methodology: Building the evidence base for method choice in government sponsored evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 113.
15.
JulnesG.RogD. J. (2007c). Pragmatic support for policies on methodology. New Directions for Evaluation, 113, 129–147.
16.
LincolnY. S. (1991). The arts and sciences of program evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 12(l), 1–7.
17.
ReichardtC. S.RallisS. F. (1994a). Editors’ notes. New Directions for Evaluation, 61, 1–3.
18.
ReichardtC. S.RallisS. F. (Eds.). (1994b). The qualitative-quantitative debate: New perspectives. New Directions for Evaluation, 61.
19.
SechrestL. (1992). Roots: Back to our first generations. Evaluation Practice, 13(l), 1–7.
20.
ThagardP.NisbettR. E. (1983). Philosophy of Science, 50, 250–267.
21.
TiptonE. (in press). Sample selection in randomized trials with multiple target populations. American Journal of Evaluation.