In 2004, Robert Stake published a provocative article that asked: “How Far Dare an Evaluator Go Toward Saving the World?” This question raises the issue of what role evaluators’ values play in the conduct of evaluations. Following review of Stake’s premises, I present value statements from a diverse group of 40 evaluators working with philanthropic foundations. The results update and revise Stake’s list of “six advocacies common in evaluation.” The findings capture changes in evaluation language and substantive concerns over the last 15 years regarding evaluators’ values and engagement. The conclusion affirms Stake’s original overarching principle. In closing, I offer an additional concern toward saving the world not on Stake’s list or that of the evaluators sampled: global sustainability and environmental justice in the face of the global pandemic and climate emergency. This process of inquiry generated a facilitation tool for use by evaluators, presented here, to support reflective practice about evaluators’ values.
AlkinM. C. (Ed.). (2013). Evaluation roots (2nd ed.). Sage.
2.
BowmanN. R.Dodge-FrancisC. (2018). Culturally responsive indigenous evaluation and tribal governments: Understanding the relationship. New Directions for Evaluation, 159, 17–31.
3.
BrighouseH.LaddH. F.LoebS.SwiftA. (2018). Educational goods: Values, evidence and decision-making. University of Illinois Press.
4.
Center for Evaluation Innovation. (2017, July). Equitable evaluation framing paper. Institute for Foundation and Donor Learning, Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy, Luminare Group Equitable Evaluation Initiative. www.equitableeval.org
HallJ. N. (2019). The other side of inequality: Using standpoint theories to examine the privilege of the evaluation profession and individual evaluators. American Journal of Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214019828485
JulnesG. (2012). Promoting value in the public interest: Informing policies for judging value in evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, (133, Spring), 1–129.
33.
JulnesG. (2019). Evaluating sustainability: Evaluative support for managing processes in the public interest. New Directions for Evaluation, (162, Summer), 1–154.
MillerR. L.KingJ. A.MarkM. M.CaracelliV. (2015). The oral history of evaluation: The professional development of Robert Stake. American Journal of Evaluation, 37(2), 287–294.
39.
Montrose-MoorheadB. (2019). Book review. American Journal of Evaluation, 40(4), 607–612.
40.
ParsonsB.DhillonL.KeeneM. (2020). Visionary evaluation for a sustainable, equitable future. Information Age Publishing.
41.
PatriziP.PattonM. Q. (2005). Using the case method to teach evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, (105, Spring).
42.
PatriziP.PattonM. Q. (2010). Evaluating strategy. New Directions for Evaluation, (120, Winter).
SchwandtT. (2008). Evaluation foundations revisited: Cultivating a life of the mind for practice. Stanford University Press.
50.
SchwandtT. (2015). Educating for intelligent belief in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 29, 139–150.
51.
ScrivenM. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus. Sage.
52.
ScrivenM. (1993). Hard-won lessons in program evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 58, 1–4.
53.
ScrivenM. (2003). Differences between evaluation and social science research. The evaluation exchange IX (4, Winter), 1. Harvard Family Research Project.
54.
ScrivenM. (2004). Reflections. In AlkinM. (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences (pp. 183–195). Sage.
55.
ScrivenM. (2013). Conceptual resolutions and evaluation: Past, present, and future. In AlkinM. (Ed.), Evaluation roots (pp. 167–179, 2nd ed.). Sage.
56.
ScrivenM. (2016). The last frontier of evaluation: Ethics. In DonaldsonS. I.PicciottoR. (Eds.). Evaluation for an equitable society (pp. 11–48). Information Age Publishing.
57.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.LevitonL. C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Sage.
58.
ShankerV. (2019a). Definitional tension: The construction of race in and through evaluation[PhD dissertation].University of Minnesota.
United Nations Children’s Fund. (2015). Unless we act now: The Impact of climate change on children. Author.
70.
VoA. T.ArchibaldT. (Eds.). (2018). Evaluative thinking. New Directions for Evaluation, (158, Summer).
71.
YarbroughD. B.ShulaL. M.HopsonR. K.CaruthersF. A. (2010). The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users (3rd ed.). Corwin Press.
