Despite growing interest in data visualization and graphically aided reporting, the evaluation literature could benefit from additional guidance on systematically integrating visual communication design and marketing into comprehensive communication strategies to improve data dissemination. This article describes the role of targeted communication strategies—based on visual communications, design, and marketing theory—in producing more effective reports. In evaluation practice, well-synthesized and translated reports often require the integration of data from multiple sources, methods, and/or time points to communicate complex findings in ways that elicit productive responses. Visual communication strategies, such as project branding or designing actionable tools with marketing principles in mind, can be applied to optimize effective reporting of complex evaluation findings. This article references a longitudinal, mixed-method evaluation of public school administrators in Michigan to illustrate the application of a systematic communication design framework to produce several graphically aided project materials and subsequent findings reports.
AndreasenA. R. (1995). Marketing social change: Changing behavior to promote health, social development, and the environment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
2.
AndreasenA. R. (2002). Marketing social marketing in the social change marketplace. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21, 3–13.
3.
AzzamT.EvergreenS.GermuthA. A.KistlerS. J. (2013). Data visualization and evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2013, 7–32.
4.
CalkinsT. (2005). Introduction: The challenge of branding. In TyboutA.CalkinsT. (Eds.), Kellogg on branding: The marketing faculty of the Kellogg School of Management (pp. 1–8). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
5.
CornishK.Goodman-DeaneJ.RuggeriK.ClarksonP. J. (2015). Visual accessibility in graphic design: A client–designer communication failure. Design Studies, 40, 176–195.
6.
CrossN. (2004). Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 25, 427–441.
7.
EvansW. D.HastingsG. (Eds.). (2008). Public health branding: Applying marketing for social change. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
8.
EvergreenS. D. (2011a). Death by boredom: The role of visual processing theory in written evaluation communication. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University.
9.
EvergreenS. D. (2011b). Eval+ comm. New Directions for Evaluation, 131, 41–46.
10.
EvergreenS. D. (2017). Effective data visualization: The right chart for the right data. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
11.
EvergreenS. D. (2018). Presenting data effectively: Communicating your findings for maximum impact (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
EvergreenS. D.MetznerC. (2013). Design principles for data visualization in evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 140, 5–20.
14.
FrascaraJ. (2001). Diagramming as a way of thinking ecologically. Visible Language, 35, 164.
15.
FrascaraJ. (2004). Communication design: Principles, methods, and practice. New York, NY: Allworth Press.
16.
FriedmanK. (2003). Theory construction in design research: Criteria, approaches, and methods. Design Studies, 24, 507–522.
17.
HendersonS.SegalE. H. (2013). Visualizing qualitative data in evaluation research. New Directions for Evaluation, 2013, 53–71.
18.
KotlerS. J.ZaltmanG. (1971). Social marketing: An approach to planned social change. Journal of Marketing, 35(3), 3–12.
19.
LefebvreR. (2011). An integrative model for social marketing. Journal of Social Marketing, 1, 54–72.
20.
LysyC. (2013). Developments in quantitative data display and their implications for evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2013, 33–51.
21.
McAlindonK. (2017). Selling innovations like soap: The Interactive systems framework and social marketing. American Journal of Community Psychology, 60, 242–256.
22.
NealJ. W.MillsK. J.McAlindonK.NealZ. P.LawlorJ. A. (2019). Multiple audiences for encouraging research use: Uncovering a typology of educators. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55, 154–181.
23.
NealJ. W.NealZ. P. (2017, 421). Drowning in data: How to prioritize. Workshop led at the William T. Grant Foundation Mixed Methods Meeting, Los Angeles, CA.
24.
NealJ. W.NealZ. P.KornbluhM.MillsK. J.LawlorJ. A. (2015). Brokering the research-practice gap: A typology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 56, 422–435.
25.
NealJ. W.NealZ. P.LawlorJ. A.MillsK. J.McAlindonK. (2018). What makes research useful for public school educators?Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 45, 432–446.
26.
NealZ. P.NealJ. W.MillsK. J.LawlorJ. A. (2018). Making or buying evidence: Using transaction cost economics to understand decision-making in public school districts. Evidence and Policy, 14, 707–724.
27.
NobleI.BestleyR. (2016). Visual research: An introduction to research methods in graphic design. London, England: Bloomsbury.
28.
NoonanR. K.WilsonK. M.MercerS. L. (2012). Navigating the road ahead: Public health challenges and the interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50, 572–580.
29.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.DickinsonW. B. (2008). Mixed methods analysis and information visualization: Graphical display for effective communication of research results. The Qualitative Report, 13, 204–225.
30.
PankajV.EmeryA. K. (2016). Data placemats: A facilitative technique designed to enhance stakeholder understanding of data. New Directions for Evaluation, 2016, 81–93.
31.
RossiA. (Director). (2016, 415). The First Monday in May[Motion picture]. New York, NY: Magnolia Pictures.
TabakR. G.KhoongE. C.ChambersD. A.BrownsonR. C. (2012). Bridging research and practice: Models for dissemination and implementation research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43, 337–350.
34.
van Bon-MartensM. J.van de GoorI. A.van OersH. A. (2017). Concept mapping as a method to enhance evidence-based public health. Evaluation and Program Planning, 60, 213–228.
35.
WinettR. A.AltmanD. G.KingA. C. (1990). Conceptual and strategic foundations for effective media campaigns for preventing the spread of HIV infection. Evaluation and Program Planning, 13, 91–104.
36.
WongD. M. (2013). The wall street journal guide to information graphics: The dos and don’ts of presenting data, facts, and figures. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
