Social justice–oriented evaluation approaches are described as participatory, culturally and contextually responsive, and self-empowering. These evaluation approaches call for the genuine participation of stakeholders for sound evaluations, particularly those outside of decision-making and service providing. Similarly, hip-hop is commonly characterized as liberating, educative, and critically responsive. Further, hip-hop engages marginalized groups around the world through creative practices such as urban art and disk jockeying, reflecting the authentic evaluative voice of these groups. In this article, we draw links between evaluation and hip-hop to identify hip-hop as useful and relevant to social justice–oriented evaluation approaches. Establishing connections between evaluation and hip-hop is important to evaluation, given the field’s current call for meaningful stakeholder participation—especially in settings that service youth and other often overlooked groups.
AldridgeD. P. (2005). From civil rights to hip-hop: Toward a nexus of ideas. Journal of African American History, 90, 226–252.
2.
AldridgeD. P.StewartJ. B. (2005). Introduction: Hip hop in history: Past, present, and future. Journal of African American History, 90, 190–195.
3.
AlimH. S.IbrahimA.PennycookA. (Eds.). (2008). Global linguistic flows: Hip-hop cultures, youth identities, and the politics of language. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
4.
AlkinM. (2013). Evaluation roots: A wider perspective of theorists’ views and influences (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
AllisonD. (2011). Hip hop, identity, and African American teens. International Journal of the Humanities, 9, 255–262.
BakerH. A. (1993). Black studies, rap, and the academy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
8.
ChangJ. (2005). Can’t stop, won’t stop: A history of the hip-hop generation. New York, NY: St. Martin’s.
9.
ChouinardJ. A. (2013). The case for participatory evaluation in an era of accountability. American Journal of Evaluation, 34, 237–253.
10.
ChristenR. S. (2003). Hip hop learning: Graffiti as an educator of urban teenagers. The Journal of Educational Foundations, 17, 57.
11.
ClayA. (2003). Keepin’ it real black youth, hip-hop culture, and black identity. American Behavioral Scientist, 46, 1346–1358.
12.
CousinsJ. B.ChouinardJ. (2012). Participatory evaluation up close: A review and integration of research-based knowledge. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
13.
CousinsJ. B.WhitmoreE. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. In WhitmoreE. (Ed.), Understanding and practicing participatory evaluation. New directions for evaluation (Vol. 80, pp. 5–23). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
14.
CrissA.BrownV. (1991). Everything’s gonna be alright (Ghetto Bastard). On Ghetto Bastard [Cassette, Vinyl]. New York, NY: Tommy Boy Records.
15.
CummingsA. D. P. (2009). Furious kinship: Critical race theory and the hip-hop nation (Vol. 48, p. 499). Louisville, KY: University of Louisville.
16.
EmdinC. (2009). Reality pedagogy: Hip-hop culture and the urban science classroom. Science education from people for people. New York, NY: Routledge.
17.
EmdinC. (2013). The rap cypher, the battle, and reality pedagogy. Developing communication and argumentation in urban science education. In HillM. L.PetchauerE. (Eds.), Schooling hip-hop: Expanding hip-hop based education across curriculum (pp. 11–27). New York, NY: Teachers College.
18.
FettermanD. (2013). Empowerment evaluation: Learning to think like an evaluator. In AlkinM. (Ed.), Evaluation roots (pp. 304–322). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
FettermanD.Rodriguez-CamposL.WandermanA.O’SullivanR. G. (2014). Collaborative, participatory, and empowerment evaluation: Building a strong conceptual foundation for stakeholder involvement approaches to evaluation (a response to cousins, Whitmore, & Shulha, 2013). American Journal of Evaluation, 35, 144–148.
20.
GreeneJ. C. (2006). Evaluation, democracy, and social change. In ShawI. F.GreeneJ. C.MarkM. M. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of evaluation (pp. 118–140). London, England: Sage.
21.
HarrisC.ThorntonC.TillmanB. (2003). I can’t quit. On Trap Muzik [CD]. Atlanta, GA: Atlantic Records & Grand Hustle Records.
22.
HillM. L. (2009). Beats, rhymes, and classroom life: Hip-hop pedagogy and the politics of identity. New York, NY: Teachers College.
23.
HillM. L.PetchauerE. (Eds.). (2013). Schooling hip-hop: Expanding hip-hop based education across the curriculum. New York, NY: Teachers College.
24.
HoodS. (1998). Responsive evaluation Amistad style: Perspectives of one African American evaluator. In DavisR. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Stake symposium on educational evaluation (pp. 101–112). Champaign: University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
25.
HoodS.HopsonR.FriersonH. (2015). Introduction: This is where we continue to stand. In HoodS.HopsonR.ObeidatK.FriersonH. (Eds.), Continuing the journey to responsive culture and cultural context in evaluation theory and practice (pp. ix–xvii). Chicago, IL: Information Age.
26.
HouseE. R.HoweK. (1999). Values in evaluation and social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
IrbyD. J.HallH. B. (2011). Fresh faces, new places: Moving beyond teacher-researcher perspectives in hip-hop-based education research. Urban Education, 46, 216–240.
28.
JohnsonJ.HallJ. N.GreeneJ. C.AhnJ. (2013). Alternative approaches for presenting evaluation findings. American Journal of Evaluation, 34, 486–503.
29.
KelleyR. D. (2002). Freedom dreams: The black radical imagination. Boston, MA: Beacon.
30.
KingJ. (2013). Getting people involved: The origin of interactive evaluation practice. In AlkinM. (Ed.), Evaluation roots (pp. 334–343). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
KitwanaB. (2003). The hip-hop generation: Young blacks and the crisis in African-American culture. New York, NY: Basic Books.
32.
KruseA. J. (2016). Toward hip-hop pedagogies for music education. International Journal of Music Education, 34, 247–260.
LamarK. (2011). Keisha’s song. On section 80 [CD]. Los Angeles, CA: Top Dawg Entertainment.
35.
LauG.NetherlandN.HaywoodM. (2003). Collaborating on evaluation for youth development. New Directions for Evaluation, 98, 47–59.
36.
LoveB. (2012). Hip-hop’s li’l sistas speak: Negotiating identities and politics in the new South. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
37.
McCormickJ. (2003). “Drag me to the asylum”: Disguising and asserting identities in an urban school. The Urban Review, 35, 111–128.
38.
MertensD. M. (1999). Inclusive evaluation: Implications of transformative theory for evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 1–14.
39.
MertensD. M.WilsonA. T. (2012). Program evaluation theory and practice: A comprehensive guide. New York, NY: Guilford.
40.
MorrellE.Duncan-AndradeJ. M. (2002). Promoting academic literacy with urban youth through engaging hip-hop culture. English Journal, 91, 88–92.
41.
MurrellM. (2011). Notes: This is the real hip-hop: Hip hop’s rejection of Paul Butler’s theory of justice in let’s get free. The Georgetown Law Journal, 99, 1179–1225.
42.
OsumareH. (2001). Beat streets in the global hood: Connective marginalities of the hip-hop globe. Journal of American & Comparative Cultures, 24, 171–181.
43.
PardueD. (2004). “Writing in the margins”: Brazilian hip-hop as an educational project. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 35, 411–432.
44.
PetchauerE. (2009). Framing and reviewing hip-hop educational research. Review of Educational Research, 79, 946–978.
45.
PrasadP. (2005). Crafting qualitative research: Working in the post positivist traditions. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
46.
RamseyG. P. (2003). Race music: Black cultures from bebop to hip-hop (Vol. 7). Berkeley: University of California.
47.
RidenhourC.ShockleeH.SadlerE.DraytonW. (1988). Don’t believe the hype. On, It Takes a Nation of Millions to Hold Us Back [Vinyl]. New York, NY: Def Jam Records.
48.
RobbinsL.PfeifferK.WesolekS.LoY. (2014). Process evaluation for a school-based physical activity intervention for 6th- and 7th grade boys: Reach, dose, and fidelity. Evaluation and Program Planning, 42, 21–31.
49.
RogersR. N. (2006). From cultural exchange to transculturation: A review of reconceptualization of cultural appropriation. Communication Theory, 16, 474–503.
50.
RoseT. (1994). Black noise: Rap music and black culture in contemporary America. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University.
51.
RoseT. (2008). The hip hop wars: What we talk about when we talk about hip hop—And why it matters. New York, NY: Basic Civitas.
52.
RoulandK.MatthewsJ.ByrdC.MeyerR.RowleyS. (2014). Culture clash: Interactions between afrocultural and mainstream cultural styles in classrooms serving African American students. Interdisciplinary Journal of Teaching and Learning, 4, 186–202.
53.
RyanK. E.ChandlerM.SamuelsM. (2007). What should school-based evaluation look like?Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33, 197–212.
54.
SamuelsM.RyanK. (2011). Grounding culture in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 32, 183–198.
55.
SegoneM. (2011). Evaluation to accelerate progress towards equity, social justice, and human rights. In SegoneM. (Ed.), Evaluation for equitable development results. Evaluation working papers #7 (pp. 2–12). New York, NY: UNICEF.
56.
ShakurT.EvansD. (1991). Brenda’s got a baby. On 2Pacalypse Now [Vinyl]. Richmond, VA: Interscope Records.
57.
StovallD. (2006). We can relate hip-hop culture, critical pedagogy, and the secondary classroom. Urban Education, 41, 585–602.
58.
StufflebeamD. L. (2001). Evaluation models. New directions for evaluation (Vol. 89). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
59.
ThomasV.MadisonA. (2010). Integration of social justice into the teaching of evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 31, 570–583.
60.
ThomasV.ParsonsB. (2016). Culturally responsive evaluation meets system-oriented evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 31, 7–28.
61.
Thompson-RobinsonM.HopsonR.SenguptaS. (Eds.). (2004). In search of cultural competence in evaluation. New directions for evaluation (Vol. 102). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
62.
TysonE. H. (2002). Hip hop therapy: An exploratory study of a rap music intervention with at-risk and delinquent youth. Journal of Poetry Therapy, 15, 131–144.
