Empowerment evaluation entered the evaluation lexicon in 1993. Since that time, it has attracted many adherents, as well as vocal detractors. A prominent issue in the debates on empowerment evaluation concerns the extent to which empowerment evaluation can be readily distinguished from other approaches to evaluation that share with it an emphasis on participatory and collaborative processes, capacity development, and evaluation use. A second issue concerns the extent to which empowerment evaluation actually leads to empowered outcomes for those who have participated in the evaluation process and those who are the intended beneficiaries of the social programs that were the objects of evaluation. The authors systematically examined 47 case examples of empowerment evaluation published from 1994 through June 2005. The results suggest wide variation among practitioners in adherence to empowerment evaluation principles and weak emphasis on the attainment of empowered outcomes for program beneficiaries. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
Andrews, A. B. (1996). Realizing participant empowerment in the evaluation of nonprofit women’s service organizations: Notes from the front line. In D. M. Fetterman, S. J. Kaftarian, & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability (pp. 141-158). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
Barrington, G. V. (1999). Empowerment goes large scale: The Canada prenatal nutrition experience. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation [Special Issue], pp. 179-192.
3.
Burke, A. C., & Julia, M. (2001). Outcomes-based evaluation (OBE) training: Issues of technology transfer and relevance to social intervention. Journal of Social Work Research & Evaluation, 2(1), 19-28.
4.
Butterfoss, F. D., Goodman, R. M., Wandersman, A., Valois, R. F., & Chinman, M. J. (1996). The plan quality index: An empowerment evaluation tool for measuring and improving the quality of plans. In D. M. Fetterman, S. J. Kaftarian, & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability (pp. 304-331). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
Campbell, R., Dorey, H., Naegeli, M., Grubstein, L. K., Bennett, K. K., Bonter, F., et al. (2004). An empowerment evaluation model for sexual assault programs: Empirical evidence of effectiveness. American Journal of Community Psychology, 34(3-4), 251-262.
6.
Cousins, J. B. (2005). Will the real empowerment evaluation please stand up? A critical friend perspective. In D. Fetterman & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation principles in practice (pp. 183-208). New York: Guilford.
7.
Cousins, J. B., & Whitmore, E. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 80, 5-24.
8.
Dorrington, C., & Solís, B. (2004). Building community, research, and policy: A case of community health and Central Americans in Los Angeles. In J. Mora & D. R. Diaz (Eds.), Latino social policy: A participatory research model (pp. 89-117). New York: Haworth.
9.
Everhart, K., & Wandersman, A. (2000). Applying comprehensive quality programming and empowerment evaluation to reduce implementation barriers. Journal of Educational & Psychological Consultation, 11(2), 177-191.
10.
Fawcett, S. B., Paine-Andrews, A., Francisco, V. T., Schultz, J. A., Richter, K. P., Lewis, R. K., et al. (1996). Empowering community health initiatives through evaluation. In D. M. Fetterman, S. J. Kaftarian, & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability (pp. 161-187). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Fetterman, D. (1994a). Empowerment evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15(1), 1-15.
12.
Fetterman, D. M. (1994b). Steps of empowerment evaluation: From California to Cape Town. Evaluation & Program Planning, 17(3), 305-313.
13.
Fetterman, D. M. (1997a). Empowerment evaluation and accreditation in higher education. In E. Chelimsky & W. R. Shadish (Eds.), Evaluation for the 21st century: A handbook (pp. 381-395). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
14.
Fetterman, D. M. (1997b). Empowerment evaluation: A response to Patton and Scriven. Evaluation Practice, 18(3), 253-266.
15.
Fetterman, D. M. (1999). Reflections on empowerment evaluation: Learning from experience. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation [Special Issue], pp. 5-37.
16.
Fetterman, D. (2001a). Empowerment evaluation and self-determination: A practical approach toward program improvement and capacity building. In N. Schneiderman & M. A. Speers (Eds.), Integrating behavioral and social sciences with public health (pp. 321-350). Washington, DC: USical Association.
17.
Fetterman, D. (2001b). Foundations of empowerment evaluation: Step by step. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Fetterman, D. M. (2002). Empowerment evaluation: Building communities of practice and a culture of learning. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(1), 89-102.
19.
Fetterman, D. M. (2005). Empowerment evaluation: From the digital divide to academic distress. In D. Fetterman & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation principles in practice (pp. 92-122). New York: Guilford.
20.
Fetterman, D., & Bowman, C. (2002). Experiential education and empowerment evaluation: Mars Rover educational program case example. Journal of Experiential Education, 25(2), 286-286.
21.
Fetterman, D. M., Kaftarian, S. J., & Wandersman, A. (Eds.). (1996). Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Fetterman, D. M., & Wandersman, A. (Eds.). (2005). Empowerment evaluation principles in practice. New York: Guilford.
23.
Fitzpatrick, J. (2000). Dialogue with David Fetterman. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 242-259.
24.
Flaspohler, P., Wandersman, A., Keener, D., Maxwell, K. N., Ace, A., Andrews, A., et al. (2003). Promoting program success and fulfilling accountability requirements in a statewide community-based initiative: Challenges, progress, and lessons learned. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 26(2), 37-52.
25.
Gómez, C. A., & Goldstein, E. (1996). The HIV prevention evaluation initiative. In D. M. Fetterman, S. J. Kaftarian, & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability (pp. 100-122). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Grills, C. N., Bass, K., Brown, D. L., & Akers, A. (1996). Empowerment evaluation: Building upon a tradition of activism in the African American community. In D. M. Fetterman, S. J. Kaftarian, & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability (pp. 123-140). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27.
Harper, G. W., Bangi, A. K., Contreras, R., Pedraza, A., Tolliver, M., & Vess, L. (2004). Diverse phases of collaboration: Working together to improve community-based HIV interventions for adolescents. American Journal of Community Psychology, 33(3-4), 193-204.
28.
Harper, G. W., Contreras, R., Bangi, A., & Pedraza, A. (2003). Collaborative process evaluation: Enhancing community relevance and cultural appropriateness in HIV prevention. In Y. Suarez-Balcazar & G. W. Harper (Eds.), Empowerment and participatory evaluation of community interventions: Multiple benefits (pp. 53-69). New York: Haworth.
29.
Harper, G. W., Lardon, C., Rappaport, J., Bangi, A. K., Contreras, R., & Pedraza, A. (2004). Community narratives: The use of narrative ethnography in participatory community research. In L. A. Jason, C. B. Keys, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, R. R. Taylor, & M. I. Davis (Eds.), Participatory community research: Theories and methods in action (pp. 199-218). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
30.
Henry, G. T. (2001). How modern democracies are shaping evaluation and the emerging challenges for evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 419-430.
31.
Henry, G. T., & Mark, M. M. (2003). Toward an agenda for research on evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 97, 69-80.
32.
Keener, D. C., Snell-Johns, J., Livet, M., & Wandersman, A. (2005). Lessons that influenced the current conceptualization of empowerment evaluation: Reflections from two evaluation projects. In D. Fetterman & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation principles in practice (pp. 73-91). New York: Guilford.
33.
Keller, J. (1996). Empowerment evaluation and state government: Moving from resistance to adoption. In D. M. Fetterman, S. J. Kaftarian, & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability (pp. 79-99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Kline, R. B. (2004). Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
35.
Lackey, J. F., Moberg, D. P., & Balistrieri, M. (1997). By whose standards? Reflections on empowerment evaluation and grassroots groups. Evaluation Practice, 18(2), 137-146.
36.
Lee, L. E. (1999). Building capacity for school improvement through evaluation: Experiences of the Manitoba School Improvement Program Inc.Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation [Special Issue], pp. 155-178.
37.
Lentz, B. E., Imm, P. S., Yost, J. B., Johnson, N. P., Barron, C., Lindberg, M. S., et al. (2005). Empowerment evaluation and organizational learning: A case study of a community coalition designed to prevent child abuse and neglect. In D. Fetterman & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation principles in practice (pp. 155-182). New York: Guilford.
38.
Levin, H. M. (1996). Empowerment evaluation and accelerated schools. In D. M. Fetterman, S. J. Kaftarian, & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability (pp. 49-64). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
Linney, J. A., & Wandersman, A. (1996). Empowering community groups with evaluation skills: The Prevention Plus III Model. In D. M. Fetterman, S. J. Kaftarian, & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability (pp. 259-276). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
Livet, M., & Wandersman, A. (2005). Organizational functioning: Facilitating effective interventions and increasing the odds of programming success. In D. Fetterman & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation principles in practice (pp. 123-154). New York: Guilford.
41.
Evaluation and Program Planning, 28, 317-319.
42.
Moeller, M., Day, S. L., & Rivera, B. D. (2004). How is education perceived on the inside? A preliminary study of adult males in a correctional setting. Journal of Correctional Education, 55(1), 40-59.
43.
Patton, M. Q. (1997a). Of vacuum cleaners and toolboxes: A response to Fetterman’s response. Evaluation Practice, 18(3), 267-270.
44.
Patton, M. Q. (1997b). Toward distinguishing empowerment evaluation and placing it in a larger context. Evaluation Practice, 18(2), 147-167.
45.
Patton, M. Q. (2005). Toward distinguishing empowerment evaluation and placing it in a larger context: Take two. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(3), 408-414.
46.
Pett, M. A. (1997). Nonparametric statistics for health care research: Statistics for small samples and unusual distributions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
Porteous, N. L., Sheldrick, B. J., & Stewart, P. J. (1999). Enhancing managers’ evaluation capacity: A case study from Ontario public health. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation [Special Issue], pp. 137-154.
48.
Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15, 121-148.
49.
Robertson, P., Jorgensen, M., & Garrow, C. (2004). Indigenizing evaluation research: How Lakota methodologies are helping “raise the tipi” in the Oglala Sioux Nation. American Indian Quarterly, 28(3/4), 499-499.
50.
Rosenthal, R. (1979). The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641.
51.
Rowe, W. E., & Jacobs, N. F. (1998). Principles and practices of organizationally integrated evaluation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 13(1), 115-138.
52.
Rowe, W. E., Jacobs, N. F., & Grant, H. (1999). Facilitating development of organizational productive capacity: A role for empowerment evaluation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation [Special Issue], pp. 69-92.
53.
Schnoes, C. J., Murphy-Berman, V., & Chambers, J. M. (2000). Empowerment evaluation applied: Experiences, analysis, and recommendations from a case study. American Journal of Evaluation, 21(1), 53-64.
54.
Schulz, A. J., Israel, B. A., Zimmerman, M. A., & Checkoway, B. N. (1995). Empowerment as a multi-level construct: Perceived control at the individual, organizational, and community levels. Health Education Research, 10(3), 309-327.
55.
Scriven, M. (1997a). Comments on Fetterman’s response. Evaluation Practice, 18(3), 271-272.
56.
Scriven, M. (1997b). Empowerment evaluation examined. Evaluation Practice, 18(2), 165-175.
57.
Scriven, M. (2005). Empowerment evaluation principles in practice. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(3), 415-417.
58.
Sechrest, L. E. (1997). Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Environment and Behavior, 29(3), 422-426.
59.
Secret, M., Jordan, A., & Ford, J. (1999). Empowerment evaluation as a social work strategy. Health & Social Work, 24(2), 120-127.
60.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Leviton, L. C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
61.
Sharma, A., Suarez-Balcazar, Y., & Baetke, M. (2003). Empowerment evaluation of a youth leadership training program. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 26(2), 89-103.
62.
Smith, M. K. (1998). Empowerment evaluation: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Evaluation & Program Planning, 21(3), 255-261.
63.
Smith, N. L. (1993). Improving evaluation through the empirical study of evaluation practice. Evaluation Practice, 14, 237-242.
64.
Smith, N. L. (1999). A framework for characterizing the practice of evaluation, with application to empowerment evaluation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation [Special Issue], pp. 39-68.
65.
Stevenson, J. F., Mitchell, R. E., & Florin, P. (1996). Evaluation and self direction in community prevention coalitions. In D. M. Fetterman, S. J. Kaftarian, & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability (pp. 208-233). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66.
Strober, E. (2005). “Is power-sharing possible?” Using empowerment evaluation with parents and nurses in a pediatric hospital transplantation setting. Human Organization, 64(2), 201-201.
67.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (1994). Empowerment evaluation, objectivist evaluation, and evaluation standards: Where the future of evaluation should not go and where it needs to go. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 321-338.
68.
Suarez-Balcazar, Y., & Orellana-Damacela, L. (1999). A university-community partnership for empowerment evaluation in a community housing organization. Sociological Practice: A Journal of Clinical and Applied Research, 1(2), 115-132.
69.
Sullins, C. D. (2003). Adapting the empowerment evaluation model: A mental health drop-in center case example. American Journal of Evaluation, 24(3), 387-398.
70.
Tang, H., Cowling, D. W., Koumjian, K., Roesler, A., Lloyd, J., & Rogers, T. (2002). Building local program evaluation capacity toward a comprehensive evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 95, 39-56.
71.
Tax, S. (1958). The fox project. Human Organization, 17, 17-19.
72.
VanderPlaat, M., Samson, Y., & Raven, P. (2001). The politics and practice of empowerment evaluation and social interventions: Lessons from the Atlantic Community Action Program for Children regional evaluation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 16(1), 79-98.
73.
Wandersman, A., Flaspohler, P., Ace, A., Ford, L., Imm, P. S., Chinman, M. J., et al. (2003). PIE à la mode: Mainstreaming evaluation and accountability in each program in every county of a statewide school readiness initiative. New Directions for Evaluation, 99, 33-49.
74.
Wandersman, A., Keener, D. C., Snell-Johns, J., Miller, R. L., Flaspohler, P., Livet-Dye, M., et al. (2004). Empowerment evaluation: Principles and action. In L. A. Jason, C. B. Keys, Y. Suarez-Balcazar, R. R. Taylor, & M. I. Davis (Eds.), Participatory community research: Theories and methods in action (pp. 139-156). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
75.
Wandersman, A., Snell-Johns, J., Lentz, B. E., Fetterman, D. M., Keener, D. C., Livet, M., et al. (2005). The principles of empowerment evaluation. In D. Fetterman & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation principles in practice (pp. 27-41). New York: Guilford.
76.
Worthen, B. R. (2001). Wither evaluation? That all depends. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 409-418.
77.
Worthington, C. (1999). Empowerment evaluation: Understanding the theory behind the framework. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 14(1), 1-28.
78.
Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational, and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43-64). New York: Kluwer Academic.
79.
Zimmerman, M. A., & Rappaport, J. (1988). Citizen empowerment, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(5), 725-750.
