Restricted accessBook reviewFirst published online 2018-6
Book Review: RealWorld Evaluation: Working Under Budget,Time,Data,and Political Constraints & Practical Program Evaluation: Theory-Driven Evaluation and the Integrated Evaluation Perspective
American Evaluation Association. (2004). Guiding principles for evaluators. Retrieved fromhttp://www.eval.org
2.
American Evaluation Association. (2011). Public statement on cultural competence. Retrieved fromhttp://www.eval.org
3.
American Evaluation Association’s Competencies Task Force. (2016). A draft of proposed competencies for the American Evaluation Association. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.
4.
FreemanM. (2010). Critical social theory and evaluation practice. New Directions for Evaluation, 127, 1–98.
5.
MabryL. (2010). Critical social theory evaluation: Slaying the dragon. New Directions for Evaluation, 127, 83–98.
6.
ParkerL. (2004). Commentary: Can critical theories of or on race be used in evaluation research in education?New Directions for Evaluation, 101, 85–93. doi:10.1002/ev.110
7.
StevahnL.KingJ. A. (2014). What does it take to be an effective qualitative evaluator? Essential competencies. In GoodyearL.JewissJ.UsingerJ.BarelaE. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in the practice of evaluation (pp. 141–166). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
8.
WorthenB. R.SandersJ. R. (1973). Education evaluation: Theory and practice. Worthington, OH: Charles A. Jones.
9.
YarbroughD. B.ShulhaL. M.HopsonR. K.CaruthersF. A. (2011). The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.