ArgyrisC. (2004). Reasons and rationalizations: The limits to organizational knowledge. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
2.
AstburyB. (2016). Reframing how evaluators think and act: New insights from Ernest House. Evaluation, 22, 58–71.
3.
CampbellD. T. (1991). Methods for the experimenting society. Evaluation Practice, 12, 223–260.
4.
Dahler-LarsenP. (2011). The evaluation society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
DonaldsonS. I.ChristieC. A.MarkM. M. (Eds.). (2015). Credible and actionable evidence: The foundation for rigorous and influential evaluations (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
6.
HouseE. R. (2015). Evaluating: Values, biases, and practical wisdom. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
7.
National Research Council. (2012). Using science as evidence in public policy. In PrewittK.SchwandtT. A.StrafM. L. (Eds.), Committee on the Use of Social Science Knowledge in Public Policy; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education (pp. 1–110). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
8.
SchönD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
9.
SchwandtT. A. (2008). Educating for intelligent belief in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 29, 139–150.
10.
SchwandtT. A. (2014). On the mutually informing relationship between practice and theory in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 35, 231–236.
11.
ScrivenM. (1993). Hard-won lessons in program evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 58, 1–103.
12.
ScrivenM. (2016). Roadblocks to recognition and revolution. American Journal of Evaluation, 37, 27–44.
13.
SullivanW. M.RosinM. S. (2008). A new agenda for higher education: Shaping a life of the mind for practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.