AlkinM. C. (Ed.). (2004). Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
AlkinM. C. (Ed.). (2013). Evaluation roots: A wider perspective on theorists’ views and influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
BhaskarR. (1978). A realist theory of science. London: Leeds.
4.
CampbellD. T. (1998). The experimenting society. In DunnW. N. (Ed.), The experimenting society: Essays in honor of Donald T. Campbell. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publisher.
5.
ChristieC. A.AlkinM. C. (2008). Evaluation theory tree re-examined. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 34, 131–135.
6.
HouseE. R. (1976). Justice in evaluation. In GlassG. V (Ed.), Evaluation studies review annual (Vol. 1), 75–100. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7.
HouseE. R. (1977). The logic of the evaluative argument. Los Angeles: University of California Center for the Study of Evaluation
8.
HouseE. R. (1980a). Evaluating with validity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9.
HouseE. R. (1980b). Evaluation as persuasion: A reply to Kelly’s critique. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2
(5), 39–40.
10.
HouseE. R. (1991). Realism in research. Educational Researcher, 20, 2–9.
11.
HouseE. R. (2007). Regression to the mean: A novel of evaluation politics. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
12.
ScrivenM. (1980). The logic of evaluation. Inverness, CA: Edge Press.
13.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.LevitonL. C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14.
StakeR. E. (1967). The countenance of educational evaluation. Teachers College Record, 68, 523–540.