Collaborative,Participatory,and Empowerment Evaluation

Bryk A. S. (1983). (Ed.) Stakeholder-based evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, Vol. 17. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Cousins J. B. Earl L. M. (1992). The case for participatory evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 397–418.

Cousins J. B. Earl L. M . (1995). Participatory Evaluation: Enhancing Evaluation Use and Organizational Learning Capacity. The Evaluation Exchange. Issue Topic: Participatory Evaluation. Harvard Family Research Project, 1. Retreived from http://www.hfrp.org/evaluation/the-evaluation-exchange/issue-archive/participatory-evaluation/participatory-evaluation-enhancing-evaluation-use-and-organizational-learning-capacity

Cousins J. B. Whitmore E. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 80, 5–23.

Cousins J. B. Whitmore E. Shulha L. (2013). Arguments for a common set of principles for collaborative inquiry in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 34, 7–22.

Emerson R. W. (1993). Self-reliance and other essays. Nashville, TN: American Renaissance.

Fetterman D. M . (2001). Foundations of empowerment evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Fetterman D. M. (2013). Empowerment evaluation in the digital villages: Hewlett-Packard’s $15 million race toward social justice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Fetterman D. M. Deitz J. Gesundheit N. (2010). Empowerment evaluation: A collaborative approach to evaluating and transforming a medical school curriculum. Academic Medicine, 85, 813–820.

Fetterman D. M. Kaftarian S. Wandersman A. (Eds.), (1996). Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self- assessment and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Fetterman D. M. Wandersman A. (Eds.). (2005). Empowerment evaluation principles in practice. New York, NY: Guilford.

Fetterman D. M. Wandersman A. (2007). Empowerment evaluation: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. American Journal of Evaluation, 28, 179–198.

Fetterman D. M. Wandersman A. (2010, November). Empowerment evaluation essentials: Highlighting the essential features of empowerment evaluation. Paper presented at the American Evaluation Association Conference, San Antonio, Texas.

Mark M. M. Shotland R. L. (1995). Stakeholder-based evaluation and value judgments: The role of perceived power and legitimacy in the selection of stakeholder groups. Evaluation Review, 9, 605–626.

Miller R. Campbell R . (2006). Taking stock of empowerment evaluation: An empirical review. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 296–319.

O’Sullivan R. (2004). Practicing evaluation: A collaborative approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Patton M. Q. (1997). Toward distinguishing empowerment evaluation and placing it in a larger context. American Journal of Evaluation, 18, 147–163.

Patton M. Q. (2005). Toward distinguishing empowerment evaluation and placing it in a larger context: Take two. American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 408–414.

Rodríguez-Campos L. O’Sullivan R. (2010, November). Collaborative evaluation essentials: Highlighting the essential features of collaborative evaluation. Paper presented at the American Evaluation Association Conference, San Antonio, Texas.

Rodríguez-Campos L. Rincones-Gómez R. (2013). Collaborative evaluations: Step-by-step (2nd ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Scriven M. (1997). Empowerment evaluation examined. American Journal of Evaluation, 18, 165–175.

Scriven M. (2005). Empowerment evaluation principles in practice. American Journal of Evaluation, 26, 415–417.

Sechrest L . (1997). Review of the book Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Environment and Behavior, 29, 422–426. Retrieved from http://www.davidfetterman.com/SechrestBookReview.htm

Shulha L. (2010, November). Participatory evaluation essentials: Highlighting the essential features of participatory evaluation. Paper presented at the American Evaluation Association Conference, San Antonio, Texas.

Stufflebeam D. L . (1994). Empowerment evaluation, objectivist evaluation, and evaluation standards: Where the future of evaluation should not go and where it needs to go. American Journal of Evaluation, 15, 321–338.