Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article provides an introduction to geographic information systems (GIS) and how the technology can be used to enhance evaluation practice. As a tool, GIS enables evaluators to incorporate contextual features (such as accessibility of program sites or community health needs) into evaluation designs and highlights the interactions between programs and their environments. Evaluators can formatively utilize GIS to examine implementation issues and their connections to the communities served and summatively to study program impacts and the factors contributing to variations between program sites. Improvements in technology as well as in data storage and access make this a feasible tool for a broader range of users. Through a hypothetical case study, the article discusses the strengths, limitations, and future trends of GIS in the context of the evaluation field.

Keywords

geographic information systems context multiple-site evaluation geostatistics

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Caritfact (2007). Homeless population map: Downtown Los Angeles. Retrieved from http://homeless.cartifact.com/webmaps/homeless/.

Chang

(2007). Introduction to geographic information systems (4th ed.). Columbus, OH: McGraw-Hill.

Chouinard

Cousins

J. B.

(2009). A review and synthesis of current research on cross-cultural evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 30, 457–494.

Chrisman

N. R.

(2005). Charting the unknown: How automated mapping became GIS at the Harvard Lab. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.

Cronbach

L. J.

(1982). Designing evaluations of educational and social programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Bolstad

(2007). GIS fundamentals: A first text on geographic information systems (3rd ed.). Saint Paul, MN: Eider Press.

Brown

(2005). Evaluating geographic program performance analysis: Weighing the benefits and costs of geographically disaggregating performance data. Public Performance & Management Review Issue, 29, 164–190.

Goodchild

M. F.

Janelle

D. G.

(2004). Thinking spatially in the social sciences. In Goodchild

M. F.

Janelle

D. G.

(Eds.), Spatially integrated social science (pp. 3–22). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Hopson

R. K.

Greene

J. C.

Bledsoe

K. L.

Villegas

T. M.

Brown

T. A.

(2008). A vision of urban educational evaluation. In Pink

W. T.

Noblit

G. W.

(Eds.), International Handbook of Urban Education. New York, NY: Springer.

10.

Jamieson

Azzam

(2012). The use of technology in evaluation practice. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 8, 1–15.

11.

Kwan

M. P.

(1998). Space-time and integral measures of individual accessibility: A comparative analysis using a point-based framework. Geographical Analysis, 30, 191–216.

12.

Lapierre

Myrick

Russell

(1999). The public health care planning problem: A case study using geographic information systems. Journal of Medical Systems, 23, 401–417.

13.

Luke

Esmundo

Bloom

(2000). Smoke signs: Patterns of tobacco billboard advertising in a metropolitan region. Tobacco Control, 9, 16–23.

14.

Monmonier

M. S.

(1996). How to lie with maps (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University Of Chicago Press.

15.

Nash

Elul

Rabkin

Tun

Saito

Becker

Nuwagaba-Biribonwoha

(2009). Strategies for more effective monitoring and evaluation systems in HIV programmatic scale-up in resource-limited settings: Implications for health systems strengthening. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 53, S58–S62.

16.

Patton

M. Q.

(2008). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

17.

Renger

Cimetta

Pettrgrove

Rogan

(2002). Geographic information systems (GIS) as an evaluation tool. American Journal of Evaluation, 23, 469–479.

18.

Scriven

(1967). The methodology of evaluation. In Stake

R. E.

(Ed.), Curriculum evaluation. American Educational Research Association Monograph Series on Evaluation (Vol. 1, pp. 39–81). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

19.

SenGupta

Hopson

Thompson-Robinson

(2004). Cultural competence in evaluation: An overview. New Directions for Evaluation, 102, 5–19.

20.

Stake

(1995). The art of case study research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

GIS in Evaluation

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References