As a fairly new and emergent construct, there remain many gaps in our knowledge about how to integrate notions of culture and cultural context into evaluation theory and practice, as well as gaps in our knowledge about how to conduct and implement evaluations in immigrant and indigenous communities. In this article, the authors provide a comprehensive review of the empirical literature on evaluations conducted in cultural communities, with an emphasis on the relationship between evaluators and stakeholders in the cross-cultural program context. The analysis of the literature selected for review leads to the development of a theoretical framework describing the inter-related and multi-textual dimensions (relational, ecological, methodological, organizational and personal) that interweave throughout the evaluation, and that ultimately inform the relationship between evaluators and stakeholders in the cross-cultural program context. The article concludes with an agenda for future research.
Abma, T.A. ( 2002). Hidden images of self. In K. E. Ryan & T. A. Schwandt (Eds.), Exploring evaluator role and identity (pp. 119-138). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing Inc.
2.
Abma, T.A. ( 2006). The social relations of evaluation. In J. C. Greene & M. M. Mark (Eds.), Handbook of evaluation: Policies, programs and practices (pp. 184-199). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Aktan, G.B. ( 1999). A cultural consistency evaluation of a substance abuse prevention program with inner city African-American families. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 19, 227-239.
5.
Alkon, A., Tschann, J.M., Ruane, S.H., Wolff, M., & Hittner, A. ( 2001). A violence-prevention and evaluation project with ethnically diverse populations. American Journal of Preventive Medicine , 20(1 Suppl.), 48-44.
6.
American Evaluation Association, Diversity Committee. ( 2004). Final Report: A cultural reading of the program evaluation standards (2nd ed.).
7.
Anderson-Draper, M.H. ( 2006). Understanding cultural competence through the evaluation of ‘‘breaking the silence: a project to generate critical knowledge about family violence within immigrant communities’’. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 21, 59-79.
8.
Baizerman, M., & Compton, D. ( 1992). From respondent and informant to consultant and participant: The evolution of a state agency policy evaluation. In A. -M. Madison (Ed.), Special issue: Minority issues in program evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 53, 5-15.
9.
Bandura, A. ( 2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 269-290.
10.
Barnes, H.M. ( 2000). Collaboration in community action: A successful partnership between indigenous communities and researchers. Health Promotion International, 15, 17-25.
11.
Barth, F. ( 1994). Enduring and emerging issues in the analysis of ethnicity . In H. Vermeulen & C. Govers (Eds.), The anthropology of ethnicity: Beyond ‘ethnic groups and boundaries’ (pp. 11-32). Amsterdam , Netherlands: HET SPINHUIS.
12.
Berends, L., & Roberts, B. ( 2003). Evaluation standards and their application to indigenous programs in Victoria, Australia. Evaluation Journal of Australasia , 3, 54-59.
13.
Bevan-Brown, J. ( 2001). Evaluating special education services for learners from ethnically diverse groups: Getting it right. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 26, 138-147.
14.
Bocock, R. ( 1992). The cultural formations of modern society. In S. Hall & B. Gieben (Eds.), Formations of modernity (pp. 229-274). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
15.
Bronfenbrenner, U. ( 1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
Butty, J.L.M., Reid, M.D., & LaPoint, V. ( 2004). A culturally responsive evaluation approach applied to the talent development school-to-career intervention program. New Directions for Evaluation, 101, 37-47.
17.
Caldwell, J.Y., Davis, J.D., Du Bois, B., Echo-Hawk, H., Erickson, J.S., Goins, R.T., et al. (2005). Culturally competent research with American Indians and Alaska Natives: Findings and recommendations of the first symposium of the work group on American Indian research and program evaluation methodology . The Journal of the National Centre, 12, 1-21.
18.
Cervantes, R.C., & Pena, C. ( 1998). Evaluating Hispanic/Latino programs: Ensuring cultural competence. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 16, 109-131.
19.
Chouinard, J.A., & Cousins, J.B. ( 2007). Culturally Competent Evaluation for Aboriginal Communities: A Review of the Empirical Literature. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 4, 40-57.
20.
Christie, C.A., & Barela, E. ( 2005). The Delphi technique as a method for increasing inclusion in the evaluation process. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 20, 105-122.
21.
Clayson, Z., Castaneda, X., Sanchez, E., & Brindis, C. ( 2002). Unequal power-changing landscapes: Negotiations between evaluation stakeholders in Latino communities. American Journal of Evaluation, 23, 33-44.
22.
Conner, R.F. ( 1985). International and domestic evaluation: Comparisons and insights. New Directions for Evaluation, 25, 19-28.
23.
Conner, R.F. ( 2004). Developing and implementing culturally competent evaluation: A discussion of multicultural validity in two HIV prevention programs for Latinos. New Directions for Evaluation, 102, 51-65.
24.
Cooper, C.W., & Christie, C.A. (2005). Evaluating parent empowerment: A look at the potential of social justice evaluation in education. Teachers College Record, 107, 2248-2274.
25.
Copeland-Carson, J. ( 2005). Applying theory and method in evaluation anthropology: The example of the South Bronx’s comprehensive community revitalization project. NAPA Bulletin, 24, 89-106.
26.
Coppens, N.M., Page, R., & Chan Thou, T. ( 2006). Reflections on the evaluation of a Cambodian youth dance program. American Journal of Community Psychology, 37, 321-331.
27.
Cousins, J.B. ( 2003). Utilization effects of participatory evaluation. In T. Kellaghan, D. L. Stufflebeam, & L. A. Wingate (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 245-265). Boston: Kluwer.
28.
Cousins, J.B. ( 2004). Crossing the bridge: Toward understanding use through empirical inquiry. In M. C. Alkin (Ed.), Evaluation roots: Tracing theorists’ views and influences (pp. 319-330). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
29.
Cresswell, J.W. ( 1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
During, S. ( 1993). Introduction. In S. During (Ed.), The cultural studies reader (2nd ed., pp. 1-28). London, Great Britain: Routledge.
31.
Edles, L.D. ( 2002). Cultural sociology in practice. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
32.
Emirbayer, M. ( 1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281-317.
33.
Espino, S.L.R., & Trickett, E.J. (2008). The spirit of ecological inquiry and intervention research reports: A heuristic elaboration. American Journal of Community Psychology, 42, 60-78.
34.
Fetterman, D.M. ( 2005). Empowerment evaluation: From the digital divide to academic distress. In D. M. Fetterman, A. Wandersman (Eds.), Empowerment evaluation principles in practice (pp. 92-122). NY: The Guilford press.
35.
Fisher, P.A., & Ball, T.J. ( 2002). The Indian family wellness project: An application of the tribal participatory research model. Prevention Science , 3, 235-240.
36.
Foucault, M. ( 1980). The history of sexuality (Vol. 1). New York: Vintage.
37.
Gadamer, H.G. ( 1989). Truth and method. New York: Crossroad Publishing Corporation.
38.
Garaway, G. ( 1996). The case-study model: An organizational strategy for cross-cultural evaluation. Evaluation, 2, 201-211.
39.
Geertz, C. ( 1973). The interpretations of culture: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.
40.
Gordon, E.W., Miller, F., & Rollock, D. ( 1990). Coping with communicentric bias in knowledge production in the social sciences. Educational Researcher, 19, 14-19.
41.
Greene, J.C. ( 2000). Challenges in practicing deliberative democratic evaluation . New Directions for Evaluation, 85, 27-38.
42.
Greene, J.C. ( 2005). Evaluators as stewards of the public good. In S. Hood, R. Hopson, & H. Frierson (Eds.), The role of culture and cultural context: A mandate for inclusion, the discovery of truth, and understanding in evaluative theory and practice (pp. 7-20). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
43.
Guarnaccia, P.J., & Rodriguez, O. ( 1996). Concepts of culture and their role in the development of culturally competent mental health services. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 18, 419-443.
Guzmán, B.L. ( 2003). Examining the role of cultural competency in program evaluation: Visions for new millennium evaluators. In S. I. Donaldson & M. Scriven (Eds.), Evaluating social programs and problems: Visions for the new millennium (pp. 167-181). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46.
Hall, S. ( 1992). The west and the rest: Discourse and power. In S. Hall & B. Gieben (Eds.), Formations of modernity (pp. 275-331). Cambridge, Great Britain: Polity Press.
47.
Hall, S. ( 1996). Introduction: Who needs identity? In S. Hall & P. Du Gay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 1-17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48.
Harklau, L., & Norwood, R. ( 2005). Negotiating researcher roles in ethnographic program evaluation: A post-modern lens. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 36, 278-288.
49.
Heskin, A.D., & Heffner, R.A. ( 1987). Learning about bilingual, multicultural organizing. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23, 525-541.
50.
Hong, Y., Mitchell, S.G., Peterson, J.A., Latkin, C.A., Tobin, K., Gann, D. ( 2005). Ethnographic process evaluation: Piloting an HIV prevention intervention program among injection drug users. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 4(1), 1-10.
51.
Hood, S. ( 2009). Evaluation for and by Navajos: A narrative case of the irrelevance of globalization. In K. R. Ryan & J. B. Cousins (Eds.), The Sage international handbook of educational evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52.
Hopson, R. ( 2003). Overview of multicultural and culturally competent program evaluation: Issues, challenges and opportunities. SocialPolicy Research Associates, Oakland, CA: The California Endowment.
53.
House, E.R. ( 1993). Professional evaluation: Social impact and political consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54.
House, E.R., & Howe, K.R. ( 2000). Deliberative democratic evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 85, 3-12.
55.
Hughes, D., Seidman, E., & Williams, N. ( 1993). Cultural phenomena and the research enterprise: Toward a culturally anchored methodology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 687-703.
56.
Jay, M., Eatmon, D., & Frierson, H.T. (2005). Cultural reflections stemming from the evaluation of an undergraduate research program. In S. Hood, R. Hopson, & H. Frierson (Eds.), The role of culture and cultural context: A mandate for inclusion, the discovery of truth, and understanding in evaluative theory and practice (pp. 201-216). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
57.
Johnson, E. ( 2005). The use of contextually relevant evaluation practices with programs designed to increase participation of minorities in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. In S. Hood, R. Hopson, & H. Frierson (Eds.), The role of culture and cultural context: A mandate for inclusion, the discovery of truth, and understanding in evaluative theory and practice (pp. 217-235). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
58.
Kelly, J.G. ( 2006). Becoming ecological: An expedition into community psychology . New York: Oxford University Press .
59.
Kelly, J.G., Azelton, L.S., Burzette, R.G., & Mock, L.O. ( 1994). Creating social settings for diversity: An ecological thesis. In E. J. Trickett, R. J. Watts, & D. Birman (Eds.), Human diversity: Perspectives on people in context (pp. 424-451). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
60.
King, J.A., Nielson, J.E., & Colby, J. ( 2004). Lessons for culturally competent evaluation from the study of a multicultural initiative. New Directions for Evaluation , 102, 67-79.
61.
Kirkhart, K.E. ( 1995). Seeking multicultural validity: A postcard from the road . Evaluation Practice, 16, 1-12.
62.
Kirkhart, K.E. ( 2005). Through a cultural lens: Reflections on validity and theory in evaluation. In S. Hood, R. Hopson, & H. Frierson (Eds.), The role of culture and cultural context: A mandate for inclusion, the discovery of truth, and understanding in evaluative theory and practice (pp. 21-39). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
63.
LaFrance, J. ( 2004). Culturally competent evaluation in Indian country. New Directions for Evaluation, 102, 39-50.
64.
Laperriere, H.N. ( 2006). Taking evaluation contexts seriously: A cross-cultural evaluation in extreme unpredictability. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 3, 41-57.
65.
LaPoint, V., & Jackson, H.L. ( 2004). Evaluating the co-construction of the family, school, and community partnership program in a low-income urban high school. New Directions for Evaluation, 101, 25-36.
66.
Letiecq, B.L., & Bailey, S.J. ( 2004). Evaluating from the outside: Conducting cross-cultural evaluation research on an American Indian reservation. Evaluation Review, 28, 342-357.
67.
Levin-Rozalis, M. ( 2003). Evaluation and research: Differences and similarities . The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 18, 1-31.
68.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. ( 1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
69.
Long, N. ( 1992). Introduction. In N. Long & A. Long (Eds.), Battlefields of knowledge: The interlocking of theory and practice in social research and development (pp. 3-43). London, Great Britain: Routledge.
70.
Lum, D. (Ed.). (2003). Culturally competent practice: A framework for understanding diverse groups and justice issues. Pacific Grover, CA: Thomas Learning.
71.
Maciak, B.J., Guzman, R., Santiago, A., Villalobos, G., & Israel, B.A. ( 1999). Establishing LA VIDA: A community-based partnership to prevent intimate violence against Latina women. Health Education & Behavior, 26, 821-840.
72.
Mark, M.M. ( 2008). Building a better evidence base for evaluation theory: Beyond general calls to a framework of types of research on evaluation. In N. Smith & P. R. Brandon (Eds.), Fundamental issues in evaluation (pp. 111-134). New York: Guilford.
73.
Mark, M.M., Greene, J.C., & Shaw, I.F. ( 2006). Introduction. In I. F. Shaw, J. C. Greene, & M. M. Mark (Eds.), Handbook of evaluation: Policies, programs and practices (pp. 1-30). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
74.
Mathison, S. (Ed.). (2005). Encyclopedia of evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
75.
McKenzie, B. ( 1997). Developing First Nations child welfare standards: Using evaluation research within a participatory framework. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 12, 133-148.
76.
McRobbie, A. ( 1992). Post-Marxism and cultural studies: A post-script. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. A. Treicher (Eds.), Cultural studies (pp. 719-730). New York: Routledge.
77.
Merryfield, M.M. ( 1985). The challenge of cross-cultural evaluation: Some views from the field. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 25, 3-17.
78.
Mertens, D.M. ( 1999). Inclusive evaluation: Implications of transformative theory for evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 1-14.
79.
Mertens, D.M., & Hopson, R.K. ( 2006). Advancing evaluation of STEM efforts through attention to diversity and culture. New Directions for Evaluation, 109, 35-51.
80.
Nagai, Y. ( 2001). Developing assessment and evaluation strategies for vernacular elementary school classrooms: A collaborative study in Papua New Guinea. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 32, 80-103.
81.
Nelson-Barber, S., LaFrance, J., Trumbull, E., & Aburto, S. ( 2005). Promoting culturally reliable and valid evaluation practice . In S. Hood, R. Hopson, & H. Frierson (Eds.), The role of culture and cultural context: A mandate for inclusion, the discovery of truth, and understanding in evaluative theory and practice (pp. 61-85). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
82.
Novins, D.K., King, M., & Son Stone, L. ( 2004). Developing a plan for measuring outcomes in model systems of care for American Indian and Alaska Native children and youth. American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research, The Journal of the National Centre, 11, 88-98.
83.
Patton, M.Q. ( 1985). Cross-cultural non-generalizations. New Directions for Evaluation, 25, 93-96.
84.
Peshkin, A. ( 1988). In search of subjectivity-One’s own. Educational Researcher, 17, 17-21.
85.
Peter, L., Christie, E., Cochran, M., Dunn, D., Elk, L., Fields, E., et al. (2003). Assessing the impact of total immersion on Cherokee language revitalization: A culturally responsive, participatory approach. In J. Reyhner, O. Trujillo, R. L. Carrasco , & L. Lockard (Eds.), Nurturing native languages. Flagstaff: Northern Arizona University.
86.
Prilleltensky, I., Nelson, G., & Valdes, L.S. ( 2000). A value-based approach to smoking prevention with immigrants from Latin America: Program evaluation. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 9, 97-117.
87.
Reagan, T. ( 1996). Non-western educational traditions: Alternative approaches to educational thought and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
88.
Reason, P. ( 1981). Introduction. In W. Fernandes & R. Tandon (Eds.), Participatory research and evaluation: Experiments in research as a process of liberation (pp. 1-15). New Delhi: Indian Social Institute.
89.
Rebien, C.C. ( 1996). Participatory evaluation of development assistance: Dealing with power and facilitative learning. Evaluation, 2, 151-171.
90.
Richmond, L.S., Peterson, D.J., & Betts, S.C. ( 2008). The evolution of an evaluation: A case study using the tribal participatory research model. Health Promotion Practice , 9, 368-377.
91.
Robertson, P., Jorgensen, M., & Garrow, C. ( 2004). Indigenizing evaluation research. American Indian Quarterly, 28, 499-526.
92.
Rogoff, B. ( 2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press. Rosaldo, R. ( 1989). Culture and truth: The remaking of social analysis. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
93.
Ryan, K.E., Chandler, M., & Samuels, M. ( 2007). What should school-based evaluation look like? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33, 197-212.
94.
Ryan, K.E., & Destefano, L. ( 2001). Dialogue as a democratizing evaluation method. Evaluation, 7, 188-203.
95.
Running Wolf, P., Soler, R., Manteuffel, B., Sondheimer, D., Santiago, R.L., & Erickson, J.S. (2002). Cultural competence approaches to evaluation in tribal communities. Symposium on Research and Evaluation Method: Lifespan Issues related to American Indians/Alaska Natives with Disabilities, AIRPEM Working Group on American Indian Research and Program Evaluation Methodology . Washington, DC.
96.
Schick, R.S. ( 2002). When the subject is difference: Conditions of voice in policy-oriented qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry , 8, 632-651.
97.
Schwandt, T.A. ( 1997). Reading the ‘‘problem of evaluation’’ in social inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 4-25.
98.
Schwandt, T.A. ( 2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative Enquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics and social constructionism. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research2nd ed., pp. 189-213). London: Sage.
99.
Schwandt, T.A. ( 2002). Traversing the terrain of role, identity and self. In K. E. Ryan & T. A. Schwandt (Eds.), Exploring evaluator role and identity (pp. 193-207). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing Inc.
100.
Seidman, S. ( 2004). Contested knowledge: Social theory today (3rd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
101.
Senese, G. ( 2005). The PENAL project: program evaluation and Native American liability. In S. Hood, R. Hopson, & H. Frierson (Eds.), The role of culture and cultural context: A mandate for inclusion, the discovery of truth, and understanding in evaluative theory and practice (pp. 129-147). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
102.
SenGupta, S., Hopson, R., & Thompson-Robinson, M. (2004). Cultural competence in evaluation: An overview. New Directions for Evaluation, 102, 5-19.
103.
Slaughter, H.B. ( 1991). The participation of cultural informants on bilingual and cross-cultural evaluation teams. Evaluation Practice, 12, 149-157.
104.
Small, S.A., Tiwari, G., & Huser, M. ( 2006). The cultural education of academic evaluators: Lessons from a university-Hmong community partnership. American Journal of Community Psychology, 37, 357-364. Smith, N.L. (1993). Improving evaluation theory through the empirical study of evaluation practice . Evaluation Practice, 14, 237-242.
105.
Stockdill, S.H., Duhon-Sells, R.M., Olson, R.A., & Patton, M.Q. ( 1992). Voices in the design and evaluation of a multicultural education program: A developmental approach. New Directions for Evaluation, 53, 17-33.
106.
Sue, D.W., & Sue, D. ( 1999). Counselling the culturally different: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
107.
Symonette, H. ( 2004). Walking pathways toward becoming a culturally competent evaluator: Boundaries, borderlands, and border crossings. New Directions for Evaluation, 102, 95-109.
108.
Thomas, V.G. ( 2004). Building a contextually responsive evaluation framework: Lessons from working with urban school interventions. New Directions for Evaluation, 101, 3-23.
109.
Thomas, W., & Bellefeuille, G. (2006). An evidence-based formative evaluation of a cross-cultural Aboriginal mental health program in Canada . Australian e-Journal for the Advancement of Mental Health , 5, 1-14.
110.
Thompson-Robinson, M., Hopson, R., & SenGupta, S. ( 2004). Editors notes. New Directions for Evaluation , 102, 1-4.
111.
Thurman, P.J., Allen, J., & Deters, P.B. ( 2004). The circles of care evaluation: Doing participatory evaluation with American Indian and Alaska Native communities. American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research. The Journal of the National Centre, 11, 139-154.
112.
Trickett, E.J., & Espino, S.L.R. (2004). Collaboration and social inquiry: Multiple meanings of a construct and its role in creating useful and valid knowledge. American Journal of Community Psychology , 34, 1-69.
113.
Uhl, G., Robinson, B., Westover, B., Bockting, W., & Cherry-Porter, T. (2004). Involving the community in HIV prevention program evaluation. Health Promotion Practice , 5, 289-296.
114.
Villarreal, M. ( 1992). The poverty of practice. In N. Long & A. Long (Eds.), Battlefields of knowledge: The interlocking of theory and practice in social research and development (pp. 247-267). London, Great Britain: Routledge.
115.
Voyle, J.A., & Simmons, D. ( 1999). Community development through partnership: Promoting health in an urban indigenous community in New Zealand. Social Science & Medicine, 49, 1035-1050.
116.
Weaver, L., & Cousins, J.B. ( 2004). Unpacking the participatory process. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 1, 19-40.
117.
White, C.J., & Hermes, M. ( 2005). Learning to play scholarly jazz: A culturally responsive evaluation of the Hopi teachers for Hopi schools project. In S. Hood, R. Hopson, & H. Frierson (Eds.), The role of culture and cultural context: A mandate for inclusion, the discovery of truth, and understanding in evaluative theory and practice (pp. 105-128). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
118.
Widdershoven, G.A.M. ( 2001). Dialogue in evaluation: A hermeneutic perspective. Evaluation, 7, 253-263.
119.
Willging, C.E., Helitzer, D., & Thompson, J. ( 2006). ‘Sharing wisdom’: Lessons learned during the development of a diabetes prevention program for urban American Indian women. Evaluation and Program Planning, 29, 130-140.
120.
Williams, R. ( 1981). Culture. Great Britain: Fontana Paperbacks .
121.
Yarbrough, D.B., Shulha, L.M., & Caruthers, F. ( 2004). Background and history of the joint committee’s program evaluation standards. New Directions for Evaluation , 104, 15-30.
122.
Zulli, R.A., & Frierson, H.T. (2004). A focus on cultural variables in evaluating an upward bound program. New Directions for Evaluation, 102, 81-93.
