The Fifth Guiding Principle

American Evaluation Association. (2004). Guiding principles for evaluators. Retrieved September 12, 2008, from http://www.eval.org/Publications/GuidingPrinciples.asp

Brodkin, E.Z. , & Kaufman, A. (2000). Policy experiments and poverty politics. Social Service Review, 74, 507-532.

Chelimsky, E. (1995). Comments on the Guiding Principles. In W. R. Shadish , D. L. Newman , M. A. Scheirer , & C. Wye (Eds.), Guiding principles for evaluators (New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 66, pp. 3-18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Cooksy, L. (2000). Commentary: Auditing the off-the-record case. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 122-128.

Cousins, J.B. , & Whitmore, E. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. In E. Whitmore (Ed.), Understanding and practicing participatory evaluation (New Directions for Evaluation, No. 80, pp. 5-23). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Diversity Committee, American Evaluation Association. (2004). A cultural reading of the Program Evaluation Standards (2nd ed). Retrieved January 26, 2009, from http://www.eval.org/culturalreading.htm

Fetterman, D. M. , & Wandersman, A. (Eds.) (2005). Empowerment evaluation principles in practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Greene, J.C. (2000). Challenges in practicing deliberative democratic evaluation. In K. E. Ryan & L. DeStefano (Eds.), Evaluation as a democratic process: Promoting inclusion, dialogue, and deliberation (New Directions for Evaluation, No. 85, pp. 13-26). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Greene, J.C. (2006). Evaluation, democracy, and social change. In I. F. Shaw , J. C. Greene , & M. M. Mark (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of evaluation (pp. 118-140). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hendricks, M. , & Conner, R.F. (1995). International perspectives on the Guiding Principles . In W. R. Shadish , D. L. Newman , M. A. Scheirer , & C. Wye (Eds.), Guiding principles for evaluators (New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 66, pp. 77-90). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

House, E.R. (1995). Principled evaluation: A critique of the AEA Guiding Principles. In W. R. Shadish , D. L. Newman , M. A. Scheirer , & C. Wye (Eds.), Guiding principles for evaluators (New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 66, pp. 27-34). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

House, E.R. , & Howe, K.R. (1999). Values in evaluation and social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1994). The Program Evaluation Standards: How to assess evaluations of educational programs (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Julnes, G. , & Rog, D. J. (Eds.) (2007). Informing federal policies on evaluation methodology: Building the evidence base for method choice in government sponsored evaluation (New Directions for Evaluation, No. 113). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Knott, T.D. (1995). An independent consultant's perspective on the Guiding Principles. In W. R. Shadish , D. L. Newman , M. A. Scheirer , & C. Wye (Eds.), Guiding principles for evaluators (New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 66, pp. 69-75). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Knott, T.D. (2000). Commentary: It's illegal and unethical. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 129-130.

Mabry, L. (1999). Circumstantial ethics. American Journal of Evaluation, 20, 199-212.

Mathie, A. , & Greene, J.C. (1997). Stakeholder participation in evaluation: How important is diversity? Evaluation and Program Planning, 20, 279-285.

Reichardt, C. S. , & Rallis, S. F. (Eds.) (1994). The qualitative-quantitative debate: New perspectives (New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 61). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Rossi, P.H. (1995). Doing good and getting it right. In W. R. Shadish , D. L. Newman , M. A. Scheirer , & C. Wye (Eds.), Guiding principles for evaluators (New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 66, pp. 3-18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Schwandt, T.A. (2002). Evaluation practice reconsidered. New York: Peter Lang.

Schwandt, T.A. (2007). On the importance of revisiting the study of ethics in evaluation. In S. Kushner & N. Norris (Eds.), Dilemmas of engagement: Evaluation and the new public management (Advances in Program Evaluation, Vol. 10, pp. 117-127). New York: Elsevier.

Shadish, W.R. , Newman, D.L. , Scheirer, M.A. , & Wye, C. (1995). Developing the Guiding Principles. In W. R. Shadish, D. L. Newman, M. A. Scheirer, & C. Wye (Eds.), Guiding principles for evaluators (New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 66, pp. 3-18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Stufflebeam, D.L. (1994). Empowerment evaluation, objectivist evaluation, and evaluation standards: Where the future of evaluation should not go, and where it needs to go. Evaluation Practice, 15, 321-338.

Worthen, B.R. (2003). How can we call evaluation a profession if there are no qualifications for practice? In T. Kellaghan & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation. Part One: Perspectives (pp. 329-344). Boston: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.